Thursday, August 11, 2011

الله يحميكم و يقويكم يا شباب إنتو فخر و عزة لبنان


Words fail to express the admiration and gratitude that any honorable being holds for these great men and women of the Lebanese Hezbollah. May God bless them and bestow peace upon them in this life and the next....



إن تنصروا الله فلا غالب لكم


.....في «حزب الله».مرض خبيث ينهكه: العشريني دمّر إحدى عشرة دبابة....


الله يحميكم و يقويكم يا شباب إنتو فخر و عزة لبنان


جعفر العطار -

قبل أيام قليلة، أزاح ع.، الشاب العشريني، ملاءة بيضاء اللون عن جسده النحيل الذي أنهكه مرض خبيث، تاركاً سرير المستشفى بخفر، عائداً إلى منزل متصدّع الأركان في زقاق عشوائي، حليق الرأس والجسد، مبتسماً كعادته.

في مثل هذه الأيام، قبل خمس سنوات، كان ع. ممتشقاً سلاحه، يتنقل به واثباً، في حركات قتالية محترفة، باحثاً بعينيه الذابلتين من شدة النعاس، عن دبابات الـ«ميركافا»، التي سرعان ما تحوّلت إلى ذباب يذوي أمام عيون أفراد مجموعته القتالية، في «وادي الحجير».

آنذاك، اشتهرت تلك المعركة باسم «مجزرة الميركافا»، بعدما دمّر المقاتلون إحدى وعشرين دبّابة، وقتلوا العشرات من الإسرائيليين، في ساعات حرب تموز الأخيرة.
بعد مرور أحد عشر يوماً على انتهاء الحرب، عاد ع. إلى منزله، أشعث الرأس، أغبر الوجه. «هل صحيح أنك شاركت في معركة وادي الحجير؟» سأله عارفوه بفضول فشلوا في إخفائه، اثر انتشار الخبر بين دائرة أصدقائه المقرّبين.

إلى يومنا هذا، يتشبث ع.، مبتسماً ابتسامة بريئة، بجوابه الذي أعلنه قبل خمس سنوات: «لم أشارك في تلك المعركة قطّ. فقد اقتصرت مهمتي، في الحرب، على تزويد المقاتلين بالطعام، فقط».
ومع ذلك، كان عارفوه يحاربونه بالأدلة التي تسلحوا بها، محاولين سبر أغوار الجدار الذي كان العشريني يتحصّن خلفه: «لقد أخبرنا فلان، بأنه ما زال مشدوهاً لمّا رأى تلك الابتسامة على وجهك بغتةً في أثناء احتدام المعركة. لماذا تصرّ على إخفاء مشاركتك؟».

الجواب ذاته، بالأسلوب الرصين الدمث ذاته، كان يواجههم: «ماذا سأستفيد لو أخفيت عنكم ذلك؟ وماذا سأخسر في حال بحت به؟ لا شيء. إذاً، دعونا نتحدث في موضوع آخر، بعيداً عن التخيلات المضحكة.. عن ابتسامات في المعارك».

أصدقاؤه المقرّبون، يعرفون أن الجدار الذي يتحصّن به ع. ، ليس جداراً أمنياً يحاول من خلاله، بأسلوب بوليسي، المناورة كي لا يُكشف أمره. هم يعرفون أنه جدار مصنوع من خجل، وليس من التواضع فحسب. الخجل الذي يفرض على الشاب الاحتماء بجدار، يجهد قدر المستطاع الحفاظ على صلابته.

فهو، كسائر المقاتلين، مقتنع بأن البوح ببطولات نفذّها، يفقده الإحساس الذي رفع الابتسامة على وجهه، لمّا سمع، من بين أصوات الصواريخ والرصاص، أصوات نحيب الغزاة، من شدة الجزع.
هو خبر عن كثب، بأن المشهد الذي رسمه في طفولته، في أن يكون مقاوماً مقاتلاً، لا يشبه التنفيذ: فوداع الأم والأب والزوجة والأطفال، قبل سلوك طريق يصعب الرجوع منه، لا يُختزل بأمنية، كأمنية طفل يحلم برحلة كشفية.. على ضفاف نهر بديع.

ذوو الطفل سيسألون، عندما يحين وقت الرحلة، عن الزمان والمكان، ومخاطر الترحال، وموعد الرجوع، فيما الطفل الذي تمنّى بأن يكون مقاوماً، سيكتشف، متلمساً بعينين يقظتين، أن الأمنية التي تمناها ذات يوم، تحتم عليه الكثير.

فأن تكون مقاوماً، لا يُختزل بحمل السلاح ومعرفة سبل التعامل معه فحسب: الطفل الذي وُلد على حبّ أمه، سيتذكر أنها تنتظر رجوعه من المعركة سالماً. سيتذكر، من بين ما سيتذكر قبل اشتداد أزير الرصاص، أن ابنته الصغيرة لثمته على وجنتيه، متمنية عليه العودة بأسرع وقت.

أن تكون مقاوماً، لا يُختصر بنقرة أصبع خاطفة على عبوة تلف الجسد، تمزّقه إرباً قرباناً...للفوز بالجنّة. الجسد يُقدّم قرباناً للدفاع عن الأرض، عن الوطن بطوائفه مجتمعة، عن أهله، الفقراء منهم والأغنياء.

أن تكون مقاوماً، يعني أن تكون مجهولاً، فقيراً لا تملك، إذا ملكت، إلا كفاف يومك، مترفعاً عن التبجح والتوعّد، بعيداً عن السياسة وخبثها، نائماً في حضن ذكريات لا تبوح بها، منتظراً لحظات من العزلة.. لا يعرفها أطفال السياسة.

أن تكون مقاوماً، يعني أنك ستنام في الحُفر، التي تشبه القبور، منتظراً إما إطلاق رصاصة في صدر من جاء لينتزع الأرض منك، أو استقبال رصاصة في صدرك، ترميك مخضباً بالدماء، تاركاً سلاحك، لطفل آخر، تمنى الأمنية ذاتها.

بعد أيام قليلة، سيعود ع. إلى سرير المستشفى، للامتثال لعلاج طويل، ربما يُبقي على جسده الملاءة البيضاء، ومعها اعتراف لا يبوح به: العشريني دمّر إحدى عشرة دبابة.. مبتسماً.

God bless you and hope you get better soon our Honorable Hero... Our Prayers are and will always be with you....


Dr. Riad JREIGE-

Depuis son installation à la tête de l'Eglise Maronite, le Patriarche Al Raï, sans jamais perdre de temps, enchaîne les visites pastorales à l'ensemble des paroisses maronites des différentes régions du Liban. Lors de ses homélies, ou même des interviews, le message d'amour, de tolérance et de pardon y est très largement évoqué et explicité, rassemblant à chaque fois un peu plus, les maronites, mais pas seulement, autour de ces fondements.

À n'en point douter, la visite de sa Béatitude dans le sud ne passera pas inaperçue.

Le message qui sera véhiculé aura une connotation particulière. Il sera fort et devra être entendu à sa juste valeur. Le martèlement volontariste du chef de l'Eglise est essentiel.

Ce dernier n'a de cesse d'œuvrer pour l'entente entre les Libanais. En substance, ce message traduit le gouffre qui sépare les honnêtes gens des malhonnêtes est infiniment plus grand que la différence dans les croyances entre les différentes communautés musulmanes et chrétiennes. Les tentations sont grandes de transformer une différence de comportement d'un groupe de personnes par rapport à un autre, en un conflit communautaire.

Politiquement, les honnêtes gens sont autant d'un parti que de l'autre. Le problème n'est donc pas politique. Les honnêtes gens font partie autant de l'une ou l'autre des communautés. Le problème n'est donc pas communautaire.

Il est demandé aux voleurs de rendre leurs butins et de se comporter en d'honnêtes citoyens.

Il ne faut donc pas se tromper de conflit.

Le Patriarche va démontrer, comme il ne cesse de le faire, que nous avons tous intérêt à vivre les uns avec les autres, l'ensemble des communautés confondues. Chacun avec ses croyances mais tous ensemble.

La tolérance représente certainement ce ligand indispensable à l'union.

Chaque parti politique serait inspiré de réfléchir à un programme politique destiné à réformer tout ce qui empêche l'évolution vers du meilleur, en dénonçant la main qui vole ou celle qui tue. L'Etat doit s’améliorer et remplir son rôle de sauvegarde, de promotion des institutions et de la coexistence, en arrêtant cette main qui vole ou celle qui tue.

La recherche du bien pour tous, c'est de la responsabilité de chacun.

Ce travail en profondeur doit être fait en interne, aucune main étrangère ne doit s'immiscer dans cette révolution. Sinon elle n'en serait pas une, sinon ce serait une manipulation.

Le Liban a été très longtemps manipulé et les tentatives continuent d'y être nombreuses.

La facilité consiste à succomber à la tentation, soit parce que l'on y a intérêt, soit parce que nous en sommes victimes. La réforme doit permettre à ceux qui en sont victimes d'en prendre conscience et d'agir en conséquence. La réforme doit responsabiliser chacun, abstraction faite de tout lien avec un parti politique ou une communauté.

Le garant des Chrétiens du Liban est leur attachement à leur culture orientale, indissociable des autres communautés, précisément sur la terre du Liban. Aucune puissance, aussi occidentale et "amicale" soit-elle, ne devra tromper quiconque en prétendant défendre les Chrétiens du Liban ou plus largement ceux de l'Orient. La confiance en son frère, de l'autre communauté, doit être supérieure à celle en un quelconque défenseur du christianisme en général et oriental en particulier.

L'appel à l'unité sera, de toutes les façons, lancé. Il a l’étoffe et la verve.

La présence des plus hauts dignitaires religieux, des autres communautés, auprès du Patriarche Al Raï serait un message fort à ceux qui rêveraient à une soumission occidentale, fusse-t-elle par le biais de l'ONU qui utilise l'OTAN qui expose sa force en semant innocemment, les ingrédients d'une future guerre civile en bonne et due forme.

Il redira fort et clair, toute son opposition au projet du nouveau Moyen-Orient en marche et dans lequel il ne voudra pas voir entraîner le Liban.

Il ira en visite pastorale à l'extrême sud du pays, jusqu'à la frontière israélienne, là où très peu de gens s'aventurent, comme pour bien mettre l'accent sur la libanité de cette terre sacrée, jadis foulée par les pas du Christ. Aujourd'hui elle est défendue, à la fois, par l'armée et la résistance.

Il faut reprendre confiance en nous pour exprimer cette conviction que nous sommes chez nous au Liban, chrétiens ou musulmans. Il n’y a pas de place pour la corruption et les réformes ne peuvent plus attendre. Il faut y aller.

Ce qu'il faut attendre de la visite du Patriarche, c'est sa grande contribution à l'édification de cette conviction que le Liban n'a d'autres destinées que celle de la coexistence ainsi que la lutte contre la corruption qui mine le pays, appauvrit sa population et l'offre au plus offrant.

Personne plus que les libanais, eux-mêmes, connaît la signification du mot liberté: liberté de pensée, liberté d'écriture, liberté de parole, liberté des convictions et liberté de respecter l'autre. Personne plus que les libanais ne connaît la signification du mot manipulation.

Le Patriarche apporte sa contribution à la réédification de l'Etat en accompagnant le Président de la république et en priant pour que tous les chefs de partis restent conscients de l'enjeu afin de prendre les bonnes décisions.

Que Dieu protège notre Patriarche afin qu'il continue à dénoncer haut et fort le mensonge et à œuvrer, toujours et quoiqu'il arrive, dans l'intérêt de la paix et de l’unité du pays....


Monday, August 01, 2011

Civil suit planned against Bush officials over Iraq torture, death and Mayhem....by Ziocons creeps.


Civil suit planned against Bush officials over Iraq torture, Long list of defendants and witnesses being prepared in planned Iraq torture lawsuit....

July 31, 2011 -- Three individuals involved in blowing the whistle at an early stage on the systematic torture and abuse of Iraqi detainees at the outset of the U.S. occupation of Iraq plan to file suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against senior political and military officials in the Bush administration. Named in the lawsuit will be former Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and top U.S. military commanders of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The plaintiffs include retired Sgt. Frank Greg Ford, who served with the 223rd Military Intelligence Battalion in Iraq and who was unceremoniously removed from Iraq in 2003, strapped to a gurney, after he cited several cases of prisoner abuse in Iraq. Ford was one of the first U.S. military members to report prisoner abuse at detention facilities in Iraq. His reports of prisoner abuse resulted in a determination by his senior officers that he was not fit for service in Iraq and he was detained and flown out of Iraq to a U.S. military hospital in Germany after leveling charges of prisoner torture, including witnessing U.S. troops forcing lit cigarettes into the ears of teenage Iraqi boys.

Ford will reportedly be joined in the lawsuit by retired Army officer Janis Karpinski, the former commander of the 800 Military Police Brigade, which had cognizance over U.S. military detention facilities in Iraq, including the now-infamous Abu Ghraib prison, the scene of repeated acts of prisoner abuse and torture. A number of Army enlisted personnel were sentenced to prison as a result of the torture scandal, however, it is alleged that the U.S. military personnel were following orders from senior officials of the Bush administration. Karpinski was reduced to the rank of colonel as a result of the Army's investigation, however, she contends, with the support of other senior U.S. military officers, that she had no access to the wing of Abu Ghraib, which was under the strict control of military intelligence and the CIA, where the prisoner abuse was taking place.

Also reportedly joining the lawsuit is Stanford University professor emeritus Philip Zimbardo, a former president of the American Psychological Association, who has conducted pioneering research, including the Stanford Prison Experiment, which examined the effects of torture on prisoners.

The lawsuit against the Bush administration officials is expected to be filed in September.

A large list of defendants and witnesses is being developed by the plaintiffs' legal team. Former President George W. Bush may also be called to testify in the trial. There is a precedent for testimony by former presidents. In 1992, former President Ronald Reagan was called to testify before Iran-contra special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh on his knowledge of the Iran-contra scandal....

America becoming Reckless, As explained by a globalist....


America becoming Reckless, As explained by a globalist....
by Tony Cartalucci

Bangkok, Thailand July 30, 2011 – The mechanics of world empire, in particular the current corporate-financier oligarchy has been examined in great detail. The US State Department, supporting NGOs funded directly by both US taxpayers’ money as well as funds from the Fortune 500 corporations they serve, alone constitute a global spanning, incessantly meddling homogeneous network working to undermine both personal and national sovereignty while replacing national governments around the world.

Photo: Globalist warmongering degenerate Anne-Marie Slaughter makes her rounds at the Fortune 500-funded Chatham House. She is the author of the book “A New World Order” and believes foreign policy should be shifted into the unelected, unaccountable hands of corporations, foundations, and NGOs.

….

This is far from a conspiracy theory – it is stated fact admitted to by the US State Department itself who regularly announces its funding of subversive activities around the globe from training, equipping, and funding hordes of youth activists years before the “Arab Spring” unfolded, to helping dupes in China circumvent national cyber defenses, to forming brigades of youth fodder to take to the streets in Belarus and Malaysia, to propping up pro-globalist propaganda outlets like Prachatai in Thailand.

Perhaps sensing that the secrecy and public ignorance the global elite have been operating behind for decades is now fading, globalist footstool and degenerate warmonger Anne-Marie Slaughter has written a sweeping essay openly admitting “foreign policy” is moving beyond governments and being put into the hands of unelected organizations, corporations, NGOs, and “social movements.” By social movements, Slaughter cites and apparently is referring to the “Arab Spring” which is on record the result of US meddling and organizing, and nothing close to resembling true grassroots activism. It is merely the latest trick out of the social engineering, human exploitation, propagandist playbook.

Slaughter’s admissions should send shivers down the spines of anyone who believes in a constitutional representative government, personal and national sovereignty, and freedom in general – for the world Slaughter proposes is one run by unaccountable, self-appointed arbiters, the likes of which have been covered ad nauseum within these pages. Self-serving hypocrisy has already rendered contrived institutions like the International Criminal Court illegitimate, as it turns its head at documented war crimes committed by Libyan rebels while pursuing in earnest cases against Libya’s Qaddafi based on evidence not even collected within the nation itself.

As we peel back the layers of Slaughter’s vision of the “new foreign policy frontier,” we see nearly every institution, organization, NGO, or consortium mentioned lined with Fortune 500 corporate sponsors and representatives pursing an agenda of global economic and military hegemony. No one would suggest that manipulating people on a massive scale, leveraging legitimate ideals such as democracy, human rights, or freedom to further a corporate-financier oligarchy’s agenda constitutes anything progressive, nonetheless, Slaughter seems to believe this is not only the future of foreign policy, but an appropriate future at that.


Image: The cover of globalist, degenerate warmonger Anne-Marie Slaughter’s book “A New World Order.” Slaughter believes the future belongs to “global networks” which upon closer examination are all chaired, funded, and directed by the Fortune 500.

….

It should be noted that Slaughter has sat upon the boards of Fortune 500 corporations McDonald’s and Citigroup as well as a Council on Foreign Relations board member. She is the author of a book literally titled, “A New World Order” whose catch line is “Global governance is here.” In it she argues that such governance is done through “a complex global web of government networks.” Upon examination it is obvious to anyone who looks into these “networks” that they represent the Fortune 500, answer to no one, and apply the rule of law as an arbitrary reflection of their self-serving interests subject to change upon a political whim. Despite Slaughter’s enthusiasm for a “New World Order,” in reality it is the recipe for a corporate fascist planetary regime and constitutes the greatest threat to humanity.

The New Foreign Policy Frontier

Slaughter begins a recent Atlantic article titled “The New Foreign Policy Frontier” by citing “corporations, foundations, NGOs, universities, think tanks, churches, civic groups, political activists, Facebook groups, and others” as the new frontier of foreign policy. She then goes on to state that US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “insists that 21st century diplomacy must not only be government to government, but also government to society and society to society, in a process facilitated and legitimated by government.” Slaughter continues by saying, “that much broader concept opens the door to a do-it-yourself foreign policy, in which individuals and groups can invent and execute an idea — for good or ill — that can affect their own and other countries in ways that once only governments could.”

And it is through this door Slaughter describes that “groups,” or more specifically corporations, along with their myriad of contrived, disingenuous NGOs, foundations, “charities,” and media outfits go about circumventing both domestic and foreign national laws as well as the will of people across the planet to execute their agenda, including free trade and wars of aggression.

Slaughter mentions a myriad of these corporate-funded entities including the Council on Foreign Relations, Google Ideas, US State Department’s Movements.org, and the corporate-funded Personal Democracy Forum. She also mentions Jared Cohen, utterly unfazed by the monumental conflict of interest represented by his revolving in and out of the US State Department, Fortune 500 corporations like Google, and fringe organizations like Movements.org that criminally combine corporate agendas with US taxpayers’ money to meddle in the sovereign affairs of foreign nations. While Slaughter maintains that these unelected corporate funded organizations are more efficient than governments, she fails to highlight that they are unelected and unaccountable. She also fails to mention what motivates corporations to expend resources on circumventing elected governments to pursue “society to society” efforts.

Slaughter goes on to use the “Arab Spring” as proof positive the new foreign policy paradigm is effective. She mentions her two days spent at the corporate-funded Personal Democracy Forum, which included bloggers and organizers from the contrived “Arab Spring.” She notes that other participants included “government officials, corporate executives, and the civic sector.” She claims the six months of unrest in the streets as a result of this “new foreign policy” has accomplished more than 30 years of traditional “foreign policy.”

Why do corporations like Google, Pepsi, British Petroleum, Boeing, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Exxon, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs care about “democracy” in the Middle East? Slaughter never seems to get around to answering this question. A thorough examination of the “Arab Spring,” its sponsorship, and the resulting mayhem and wall-to-wall exploitation being attempted clears up any doubt as to the summation of Slaughter’s acclaimed “New World Order.” It is a parasitic modern day empire spreading its influence, consolidating its power, and deposing all competition to its existence. It is the logical progression of the British Empire and American “Manifest Destiny” combined in a modern day transatlantic, corporate-financier oligarchy.

Arab Spring: New Foreign Policy/Neo-Imperialism in Action

Slaughter’s legitimacy stumbles not only because she is a degenerate warmongering corporate fascist who has spent a lifetime in the service of a global corporate-financier oligarchy, it stumbles also because of her poor choice of examples used to sell her concept of “global governance.” She believes that “Build Local, Go Global and Change the World” represents the new 21st century activist mantra – however when foreign money representing nefarious corporate agendas are doing the building locally, using their vast media empire to spread it globally and “change the world” it would be difficult to label it as an “activist mantra.” It more clearly resembles an imperialist mantra of using duped activists.

Take for example the Egyptian April 6 Movement. It was in New York City as early as 2008 receiving training and an opportunity to “network” at the US State Department sponsored Alliance for Youth Movements (AYM) summit. In 2009, the April 6 Movement then attended training at the US-created CANVAS organization in Serbia before returning to Egypt to partake in the year-long run up to the revolution led by International Crisis Group trustee Mohamed ElBaradei and his “National Front for Change.” In fact, April 6 Movement members attempted to welcome ElBaradeiwhen he first returned to Egypt back in February, 2010, almost a full year before the “Arab Spring” would even begin.

Image: Alliance for Youth Movements boasts major corporate support, as well as a partnership with the US State Department. The organization was contrived solely to foment unrest throughout target nations.

….

The US State Department backed by Fortune 500 corporations literally held the Egyptian opposition’s hand for years walking them through their “revolution.” With an overt US stooge, Mohamed ElBaradei leading them and still to this day attempting to worm his way into Egypt’s presidency, the victory is neither the “Egyptian people’s” nor “democracy’s,” but rather the victory of corporations and their interests within the strategically located, 80 million strong nation. Nothing could be more damning of the Egyptian revolution and its final results than the victory lap John McCain, chairman of the International Republican Institute cited by the New York Times as being instrumental in executing the “Arab Spring,” conducted with Fortune 500 industry magnates at his side. The June 2010 trip served as an opportunity for these corporate interests, the chief sponsors behind the training and organizing of ElBaradei’s army of dupes, to size up assets they soon hope to roll into their financial empires as well as to promote “private sector growth.”

This is surely not what the Egyptian youth had in mind – surely it is not in their best interest to be exposed to the parasitic corporate fascists currently bankrupting every nation from North America to Europe. However their ignorance, short-sightedness, and immense naivety allowed this nefarious global network to manipulate and mislead them, their nation, their entire future into the shackles of modern day imperialism.

Conclusion

This nefarious global network is precisely what Slaughter is promoting in her writings, constituting what she admittedly calls a “New World Order” for enabling global governance. For those that take the time to examine who is behind the “NGOs, universities, think tanks, churches, civic groups, political activists, Facebook groups” Slaughter refers to, they will find corporations like Exxon, Dyncorp, Goldman Sachs, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, Rothschild, Halliburton, Bechtel, BP, and many others.

Could anyone seriously accept corporations that are responsible for the worst chapters in modern human history as the architects of a system of global governance and ultimately our future? With the power and wealth they wield, how would they be held accountable? They have the ability to literally buy politicians on both sides of every election from one side of the planet to the other with bottom-lines that eclipse many national GDPs – they do so in a process that is streamlined with the creation of supranational entities like the European Union, North American Union, ASEAN and others. Already the EU is proclaiming dictates each member state is beholden to, with supranational law superseding national and local laws.

It is a bleak future indeed, one where true freedom is replaced with the mere illusion of it. Pragmatism and self-reliance is replaced with trips to the ballot box to pick from a variety of bought-off, ineffectual, self-serving crooks serving a degenerate global oligarchy.

Policy is already being produced not by the people but by corporate-funded think-tanks that then market it to the public through their control of the mainstream media. Their system is refined down to a science – their system is now merely being replicated, nation to nation. The solution to this problem is obvious. If the power truly lies with these corporations, the very foundation upon which Slaughter’s “New World Order” rests, undermining these corporations through full-spectrum boycotts and the systematic replacement of their goods and services on a local level shifts that power back into the people’s hands – pragmatically, not politically. It is a solution as elegant as it is simple and one that is impossible to commandeer as the globalists have done with so many attempted political solutions in the past.

There is no doubt now, with daily affirmations coming from the global elite themselves that their “New World Order” is coming. There is no doubt, as exemplified in Libya, that they are willing to murder on vast scales to eliminate any obstruction to their designs. There is no doubt, after the corporate-financiers have just helped themselves to trillions of taxpayers’s dollars to cover their collapsing pyramid schemes that they are far from the progressive “international order” they claim to represent. There is no doubt that now is the time to act. There is absolutely no justification for buying another Pepsi, Coke, Big Mac, or Starbucks and further empowering this modern day empire. What we have been taught are the features of a civilized society are in fact the padded, gilded shackles of our enslavement. There is absolutely nothing the global corporatocracy can do that people can’t do better locally. The only barrier is ambition, education, and a shift in our collective paradigm to see ourselves, not some elected savior, as the ultimate solution to our problems.

The fulfillment of Slaughter’s depraved vision of the future rests entirely in our hands. It will be determined day by day, depending on how we choose to spend our resources, time, attention, and energy. The simple decision to buy or produce locally rather than patronize Walmart, Starbucks, or any number of other globalist consumer feeding troughs as an individual may seem futile, but a shift in our collective actions and paradigm will undoubtedly derail this ignoble future that awaits us....




Thursday, July 28, 2011

An Israeli intelligence mole in the highest political office in New Zealand?

Prime Minister John Key is a MOSSAD Mole in New Zealand....



An Israeli intelligence mole in the highest political office in New Zealand?


July , 2011 -- John Key's threat to U.S. national security....UKUSA Alliance of Evils at work....



The waffling engaged in by New Zealand's conservative Prime Minister John Key over the uncovering by the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS) and the New Zealand police of a major Israeli Mossad intelligence operation in Christchurch that, among other things, attempted to access New Zealand government databases in Canterbury after last February's devastating earthquake, calls into question Key's suitability to have access to U.S., Australian, British, and Canadian signals intelligence (SIGINT) shared with New Zealand pursuant to the UK-USA SIGINT alliance.

Key has brushed off concerns that he has not been forthcoming about what he discussed with Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu during four phone calls on the day of the quake. Key maintains he spoke to Netanyahu only once. Key said Netanyahu was interested in locating Israelis who had died in the quake. One suspected Mossad agent, Ofer Mizrahi, was killed in a van damaged during the quake and police later discovered that he had in his possession five passports. Two Israeli accomplices of Mizrahi rapidly fled the country. Questions remain over Key's possible role in facilitating the quick departure of the Israelis before police could question them.

Key was asked a number of questions by the New Zealand media while he was in San Francisco, where he is suspected of having attended the annual super-secret and homo-erotic gathering of U.S. and foreign political and business elite at the Bohemian Grove, north of the city. Following his visit to San Francisco, Key paid a visit to Barack Obama at the White House.

A number of Mossad agents reportedly fled New Zealand after the quake and an unofficial Israeli rescue team sent for quake relief was found to be rifling through files at the central police department building in Christchurch. High-level Israeli government intervention was evident as the Mossad team and the Israeli rescue team were exfiltrated from the country. The question remains is what role Key played in the exfiltration and whether he interfered with an NZSIS and police investigation of the Israeli operations in New Zealand.

Key is currently privy to highly-classified intelligence shared by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) and its Canadian, Australian, British, and New Zealand partners. To illustrate the danger of an Israeli mole occupying the highest political office in New Zealand, the following is excerpted from a 1995 draft of an unpublished book by us describing the SIGINT relationship between the U.S. and New Zealand as it existed at the time:


"NSA’s New Zealand partner, the small and secretive Government Communications Security Board (GCSB), operates a modern $40 million eavesdropping station in a serene valley at Waihopai, near the town of Blenheim, in the northeast part of the South Island. The station, along with its 56-foot parabolic dish antenna, was completed in mid-1989. Waihopai, which was partially built with funding from the Puzzle Palace, has a crew of about thirty technicians, including some NSA personnel. An older listening station at Tangimoana on the North Island of New Zealand sends its data to Waihopai. Waihopai’s main function is to listen in on satellite communications throughout the Pacific Ocean region. Tangimoana and its newly-installed HFDF equipment played an important part in monitoring Argentine naval communications during the 1982 Falklands War. GCSB intercepts of Argentine ships were passed immediately by the Kiwis to their British colleagues at GCHQ in Cheltenham.

Operation Deep Freeze, located in New Zealand’s Antarctic territory, also may serve a SIGINT function. The base has been periodically put on military alert during times of crisis and, like the GCHQ base at Cheltenham, New Zealand employees of Deep Freeze are barred from joining labor unions. Deep Freeze’s support base at Harewood near Christchurch has twice weekly serviced U.S. Air Force Starlifters transporting computer equipment to and from NSA’s base at Pine Gap, Australia. To highlight New Zealand’s electronic surveillance role in the region, a U.S. Pacific Fleet order, dated October 1988, assigns New Zealand responsibility for monitoring all shipping communications in an area extending halfway across the Tasman Sea to the west, north to the equator, and about 950 miles to the east beyond the Chatham Islands. A fleet of Royal New Zealand Air Force P3 Orions patrol a 3,000,000 square mile region of the Pacific and then ships its SIGINT “catch” off to Waihopai where it is then transmitted to Fort Meade.

The Waihopai base has been a focal point for New Zealand’s vocal peace movement which has charged that the base is tasked with intercepting the private telephone calls of New Zealand citizens. In 1988, New Zealand’s Prime Minister David Lange said the intercepts performed by the station were like “trying to get a cup of water from Niagara Falls.” Defending the establishment of the base, he affirmed that the base was not targeted against New Zealanders’ private communications. It was ironic that Lange, a vocal critic of American foreign policy, remained supportive of the construction of one of the Puzzle Palace’s southernmost ears. Lange announced the construction of the Waihopai station on December 2, 1987:

“To further enhance our own intelligence capabilities a defense satellite communication station will be constructed in the Waihopai Valley, near Blenheim.

A site in the Waihopai Valley of about 77 acres has been purchased. It was selected for technical reasons, including lack of radio interference, climate, and freedom from salt corrosion, and for the availability of support from RNZAF (Royal New Zealand Air Force) Woodburne nearby. A satellite dish will be erected there. There will be in addition an operations building and workshop and the usual security forces. Construction will begin in 1988 and the station is expected to be operational in 1989.

The station will be staffed an operated by the Government Communications Security Bureau. It will be wholly New Zealand owned and controlled . . . The station will mark a new level of sophistication in our independent intelligence capability.”

In March 1988, New Zealand’s Defense Minister Bob Tizard inadvertently disclosed the missions of both Waihopai and Australia’s Geraldton facility. Tizard, appearing at a press conference while on a tour of Australia with Australia’s Defense Minister Kim Beazley, stated that the two listening stations would be used to monitor the satellite communications of third countries. For example, three Mexican Ilhuicahua communications satellites were located within Waihopai’s coverage area. Beazley was so upset over the gaffe that he canceled the rest of Tizard’s Australian “walkabout” which would have eventually taken him to Pine Gap and Nurrungar. New Zealand had already been cut off from the UKUSA SIGINT data because of a dispute arising from New Zealand’s ban on U.S. Navy ships carrying nuclear weapons. The NSA, CIA, NRO, and GCHQ were so concerned about U.S. intelligence inadvertently being provided to New Zealand, the Australians were forced to employ a large staff whose sole purpose was to filter out U.S. and British intelligence from Australian intelligence destined for New Zealand. Adding insult to injury, the Australians billed the New Zealanders for this unsolicited censorship service.

It appears that New Zealand and its Sigint allies have long since made up. Tizard let the cat out of the bag early when he was asked if Waihopai would share intelligence with the Kojarena base in Australia. Tizard said, referring to satellite Sigint, “when you’ve got it, you’ve got something to exchange if you want to." In February 1994, the New Zealand Sigint relationship with the United States was fully restored when President Clinton signed a directive restoring high-level intelligence contacts between Washington and Wellington. President Bush had already restored some intelligence links with New Zealand during Operation Desert Storm.





Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Mossad's control of formerly anti-Semitic neo-Nazi groups in Europe lies at heart of Brevik's terrorist network....


Mossad's control of formerly anti-Semitic neo-Nazi groups in Europe lies at heart of Brevik's terrorist network....



So the moral of the story is, as always with Nazis, all roads lead back to Zion.

July , 2011 -- Another "smoking gun" Breivik link to Israel...

I've been chasing Mossad longer than reporter Kolchak (Darrin McGavin) was chasing vampires. Frankly, I'd rather have his job. Vampires are not as ruthless and don't take as much blood as Mossad. As far as 9/11 is concerned, I wrote the story, which is on this website, and it was for a major wire service at the time. It was killed due to pressure from the "usual suspects," who shouldn't be hard to identify. They also canned Helen Thomas and Rick Sanchez.

When I was involved in the damage assessment during my time in the Navy that resulted from the Jonathan Pollard espionage -- he worked for Mossad, not Germany, or Russia, or Luxembourg -- it was apparent that Mossad is the greatest threat to the national security of this nation. The KGB and CIA had many "ground rules" they played by. Not so with Mossad. The difference between then and now is that Mossad is a criminal syndicate enterprise, operated and staffed by former Soviet Jews recruited from the heart of the Russian-Ukrainian-Byelorussian Mafia. They make the Cosa Nostra look like a bunch of Camp Fire Girls....

Although the mainstream corporate media and even a few "alternative news" websites are ignoring the proven links between Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik and Israel, yet another "smoking gun" connection between the pro-Zionist mass murderer and Israel has emerged.

Ninety minutes before Breivik was reported to have detonated a huge fertilizer-fuel bomb in the government district of downtown Oslo and then proceeding to Utoya island dressed as a uniformed police officer to massacre scores of youth attending a Norwegian Labor Party jamboree, he sent an email containing a 1500-page rambling manifesto to Isak Nygren, a member of the far-right, anti-Islamic and anti-Roma (gypsy), and pro-Zionist Sweden Democrats (SD) political party. Among Breivik's writings is this quote: "So let us fight together with Israel, with our Zionist brothers against all anti-Zionists, against all cultural Marxists/multiculturalists."

Who is Isak Nygren? One will not see any mention of him in the English-language corporate media. Nygren is a pro-Israeli SD activist who is only 21 years old but has already run for municipal-level political office in his native province of Sodermanland and municipality of Katrineholm, Sweden. It is also noteworthy that Nygren was not in Sweden when he received Breivik's e-mail but, according to the July 24 edition of Sweden's Nyheter newspaper, was in Israel living on a kibbutz. The location of the kibbutz was not reported. There are other reports on Internet websites that Nygren is Jewish.

The only English-language media that reported Breivik's connection to Nygren is Die Presse of Vienna, Eskilstuna-Kurinen of Sweden,Sveriges Radio, Expo magazine of Sweden, the Berliner Zeitung of Germany, and Kurier of Austria. To its credit, Nyheter is the only media outlet that officially reported on Breivik's connections to Nygren, in addition to Nygren's current presence in Israel.

The media blackout of Breivik's Israeli connections is largely the result of marching orders sent out from the Israel and Zionist lobby. The orders are clear: there will be no mention of Breivik's pro-Israeli stance nor his connections to individuals like Nygren. Attention to Breivik's Israeli and Jewish connections would expose Mossad's infiltration of neo-Nazi groups and political parties to turn them away from anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial and into anti-Islamic and pro-Israeli pressure movements.

Nygren has stated that he is pro-Israel. However, he is also a member of the neo-Nazi Nordic Alliance, which has branches in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. There are now reports that last year Breivik attended a rally of the English Defense League (EDL) in London to hear Dutch Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders, an ardent anti-Muslim and supporter of Israel, to address the gathering. There are other reports that Breivik met with the leadership of the EDL and Wilders. The EDL's Swedish offshoot is the Swedish Defense League, which counts Nygren as one of its activists. In September 2010, the Danish leftist newspaper Arbejder pointed to possible links between Nygren and the xenophobic far-right Danish People's Party of Pia Kaersgaard, which provides parliamentary support for the current center-right Danish government.

Nygren's blog states that he has no connections with Breivik. However, in response to a request from a reporter for Austria's ORF television network about Breivik's use of .at domains to send e-mail to an entity called the "Vienna School," Nygren, from Israel, refused to cooperate. The reporter pointed out that in Austria, most e-mail addresses do not use the .at country domain for Austria but addresses like gmx.mail and other commercial addresses.

Nygren was interviewed by Sweden's English-language publication, Expo, and said he is opposed to mixed marriages between European women and "niggers, Asians, etc." Nygren also opposes adoption by Swedish parents of non-white children from abroad. Nygren has advocated for the expulsion of Roma (gypsies) from Sweden and the mandatory "re-education" of Swedish Muslims. Last February, Nygren, according to the SVT Swedish television network, said, "As long as you do not live in Sweden so I do not care. I'm not attracted to the Negroes."

The EDL, SD, Wilders, Nygren, and Zionists in the United States like Pam Geller, who Breivik admires, are all attempting to distance themselves from the Norwegian mass murderer. The "lone wolf" appellation being conferred on Breivik by his Zionist and neo-Nazi friends, as well as the English-speaking corporate media, is now being undermined by reports of law enforcement investigations of Breivik's network, including the two additional operating cells he mentioned in an Oslo court room on July 25. The police investigations extend beyond Norway to France, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Austria, Poland, and other countries.

However, the corporate media is still insisting that Breivik is a deranged single actor. Although, he is clearly deranged, even some alternate news outlets, while believing Breivik could not have acted alone, are continuing to ignore Breivik's connections to Israel and Zionist groups, pushing fanciful notions of involvement by NATO, Freemasons, and the Illuminati in Breivik's massacre.

One question is not being asked: Why is a correspondent who supports Breivik's thoughts on Muslims and non-whites in a kibbutz in Israel and not answering questions in a police station in Sweden?

Israel, Asef Shawkat and the U.S.= the "Frick and Frack" of international "wet affairs."; they spin enough Israeli cotton cloth to provide a T-shirt each for the entire population of the Zioconned USA...and MENA....The way to deal with any spoiled brat, especially one that kills innocent Lebanese, Turks, Pals. and Norwegians, is to plant a big boot up their ass, deliver a debilitating blow that they will feel for years....Mossad's hands and the infamous White House Murder INC, are dripping with blood since 1948!
July , 2011 -- After Oslo: Time to crack down on Mossad.....


Note: This article is an exclusive to the Strategic Culture Foundation in Moscow and is posted this date on their site. However, their web site has been experiencing frequent disruptions.


After Oslo: Time to Crack Down On Mossad Terrorism....

Wayne MADSEN (USA) | 25.07.2011

Israel’s most secret and tried-and-true weapon is the “false flag” terrorist attack.

State-sponsored terrorism is defined by Encyclopedia Britannica as the “systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective [and] is employed by governments -- or more often by factions within governments -- against that government's citizens, against factions within the government, or against foreign governments or groups.”

On July 22, a bomb, said to be an Oklahoma City-type explosive device, crafted with fertilizer and diesel fuel, blew up in downtown Oslo, Norway, in the heart of the government district. Shortly thereafter, a man dressed in a Norwegian police uniform opened fire on a Labor Party youth camp on the island of Utoya in Tyri fjord. Access to the island was by boat only. Over 100 people were killed in the twin terror attacks.

Almost immediately, the world’s corporate media began pushing the story that those who were responsible for the blast and mass shooting were associated with “Al Qaeda” and other radical Islamist groups. CNN’s Washington, DC chief anchor Wolf Blitzer, a former spokesman for the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) lobby and a correspondent for the Jerusalem Post, began his late afternoon program by pointing to “Al Qaeda” and radical Islamists as the chief culprits for the terrorist attacks in Norway.

CNN paraded out a number “experts,” in actuality, propagandists for the Israeli agenda linked to neo-conservative outlets and the Pentagon’s “terrorism industrial complex,” before the cameras to advance the radical Islamist meme even as Norwegian authorities pinned blame on the attack on at least one perpetrator, a Norwegian named Anders Behring Breivik. CNN constantly showed footage of frightened people in downtown Oslo running for their lives from the site of the blast, as well as still photograph of a pall of light-brown smoke over downtown Oslo. Of course, CNN’s intention was to evoke memories of the 9/11 attack in Manhattan.

Breivik, who sometimes anglicized his name as Andrew Berwick in his numerous web postings, was said to be a right-wing Islamophobe who sympathized with Zionism and who was a Freemason… Breivik was also reported to be a fundamentalist Christian but he adopted a stance against the Lutheran Church, the state church of Norway, and argued for a “collective” counter-reformation to return the Protestant churches to the control of the Vatican and the Pope. Breivik lambasted the Lutheran Church and other mainstream Protestant churches, condemning “Priests in jeans who march for Palestine.”

More incredibly, the London tabloid of Rupert Murdoch’s scandal-plagued News International, The Sun, went to press with the following false headline: “Norway’s 911: ‘Al Qaeda’ Massacre.” On March 29, 2011, Harvard Law School’s extremist Zionist Professor Alan Dershowitz penned a piece in the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal, a newspaper that actively discriminates against the hiring of non-Jews as reporters and editors in violation of U.S. civil rights and equal opportunity employment laws, in which he called Norway anti-Semitic. Dershowitz cited as an example former Norwegian Prime Minister Kare Willock’s criticism of President Barack Obama’s choice of Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff because he is Jewish. In fact, Emanuel’s pro- Israeli sympathies as a former member of the Israel Defense Force are what prompted many political observers in Washington and elsewhere to question his primary loyalty to the United States.

A network of Israeli bloggers pushed a claim of responsibility on a previously-unknown group called Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami (the Helpers of the Global Jihad). The group’s claims were picked up and run by several corporate media outlets and then pulled when it was discovered the claim was a hoax. Mossad has a program to distribute bogus claims of responsibility for Islamist terrorist attacks via “Jihadist” websites that are actually operated by the Mossad and a network of “hasbaratchiks,” Israeli and foreign Jews who act as propagandists on the web. These hasbara (propaganda) agents and volunteers operate through such programs as Megaphone and GIYUS (“Give Israel Your United Support.”) After the attempt to blame the Norway attacks on Islamists failed, the “hasbaratchiks” shifted to “sock puppet” troll mode, posting comments on blogs that criticized allegations that Mossad and Zionists were behind the Norway attacks, emphasizing that such beliefs were “anti-Semitic” and wild “conspiracy theories.” Some Israeli “sock puppets” even offered lunatic suggestions that Breivik was planted by Islamists to make Israel and Zionists look bad.

When the “Islamist” connection to the holocaust in Norway was shown to be non-existent after Norwegian security and police agencies began looking at the evidence, the corporate media switched its propaganda line from “radical Islam” being responsible to “far –right extremism” opposed to multiculturalism and immigration in Europe as the culprit. Even outlets that in the past had been known for their independence from the corporate media line, including Al Jazeera and RT [formerly known as Russia Today], echoed the line that Breivik primarily represented right-wing opposition to Muslim immigrants in Europe. Al Jazeera repeated the line that Breivik was a “lone madman,” the insinuation being that he was not linked to any wider network. While Breivik certainly was associated with the far-right xenophobic elements in Norway, Europe, and North America, there was no mention by the corporate media of his admiration for such American Zionist Islamophobes as Richard Pipes and Pam Geller. Geller led the bigoted anti-Muslim campaign against an Islamic Center near the site of “Ground Zero,” the former World Trade Center site, in lower Manhattan.
Breivik posted a number of his anti-Muslim and pro-Zionist screeds on the Norwegian website www.document.no, which is operated by Hans-Kristian Rustad, a Norwegian pro-Israeli journalist.

No corporate media outlets reported that the brand of far-right extremism of Breivik is closely associated with Zionist-supported far-right anti-immigrant political parties and movements in Western Europe, including the mis-named Progress Party of Norway, the Dutch Freedom Party of Islamophobe Geert Wilders, the Sweden Democrats, Finland’s True Finns Party, the Danish People’s Party, the English Defense League, the Pro-Germany Citizen’s Movement, and a pan-Nordic fascist terrorist group called “Nordiske.” Breivik also expressed support for the Tea Party in the United States…


The European anti-Muslim xenophobic network is linked to the notorious publication of Prophet Muhammad cartoons by the neo-conservative Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten and Norway’s Dagbladet. The Euro-xenophobes are supported by the longtime Zionist Bernard-Henri Levy, the French philosopher who is a friend of French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and disgraced former International Monetary Fund managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn. It is noteworthy that Levy is one of the major backers of the Libyan rebels fighting Muammar Qaddafi. Norway announced it was pulling its aircraft from the NATO campaign in Libya at the end of July. Norway also announced its support for Palestine’s sovereignty resolution in the UN General Assembly in September.

As more and more evidence pointed to Oslo being yet another example of a state-sponsored terrorist attack by Israel’s Mossad, the corporate media studiously avoided mentioning how the Norwegian government through its recent actions, had become a major problem for Israel and its allies abroad, especially on the Palestine sovereignty issue… In addition, Norwegian police and intelligence are painfully aware of Mossad’s past operations in Norway, including the infamous Lillehammer Affair in 1973. On July 21, 1973, Mossad agents assassinated Ali Hassan Salameh, a Moroccan waiter in Lillehammer, wrongly believing he was the operations chief for the Palestinian terrorist group “Black September.” Norwegian police arrested the Mossad agents who killed Salameh and uncovered an intricate network of Mossad safe houses, phone numbers, and Norwegian sleeper agents for Mossad.

Just as was the case with the coordinated bombings of Madrid trains on March 22, 2004 and London buses and trains on July 7, 2005, viewed by European security services as being the work of not “Al Qaeda” but domestic “radicals,” there was no link to Islamist radicals with the attacks in Norway. However, there was every indication that the attack on Norway was intended to shake up the Norwegian population and damage the reputation of the left-of-center Norwegian government of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg.

The corporate media insisted that Breivik was solely responsible for Norway’s worst violent attack since World War II. Norwegian police reports that a second gunman, described as having “thick dark hair and a non-Nordic appearance,” were suppressed in much of the corporate media. The time line of the Oslo attack causes anyone’s imagination to be stretched on being sold a “lone gunman/bomber” theory.

At 3:26 pm Oslo time a massive car bomb was detonated outside the office of the Prime Minister of Norway. Since July 22 was a public holiday, there were relatively few people inside the Prime Minister’s office or the surrounding offices of the Petroleum and Energy Ministry and the VG [Verdens Gang] newspaper, Norway’s largest paper.

As police responded to the downtown Oslo blast, Breivik was said to have taken a boat the Utoya island dressed as a policeman and began opening fire on young members of the Norwegian Labor Party youth camp meeting. The shooting allegedly began at 4:50 pm. Norwegian SWAT team “Delta” had trouble getting a helicopter started and struggled to find a boat to get to Utoya island. The SWAT team finally arrived on the island at 6:20 pm only to find scores of the next generation of Norwegian Labor Party leaders dead. Breivik calmly surrendered to the police. When Breivik arrived on Utoya he told police on the island that he was there for a routine security check following the bombing in downtown Oslo.

Norway’s Acting Police chief Sveinung Sponheim said the police were still investigating whether Breivik was acting with a larger network.
Sponheim’s revelation countered the “lone wolf” theory advanced by corporate media outlets in Western nations.

Norway’s coalition Labor-Socialist Left government has been seen as hostile to the interests of Israel and the United States. There is now a widespread belief that the terrorist attack against Norway was engineered to shock erstwhile peaceful Norway, a nation where police generally still patrol the streets unarmed, into adopting the police state tactics of the United States, Israel, Britain, and other Western nations. Norway’s pro-Palestinian foreign policy also irked the Zionist and the far-right anti-Islamic factions in Europe and North America, as well as the governments of Israel and the United States.


In a move that complements American and Israeli propaganda that Norway has not stepped up to the surveillance state model imposed by other Western governments, the suspicious WikiLeaks decided to release U.S. State Department cables from the U.S. embassy in Oslo that criticized Norway for not recognizing the “Al Qaeda” threat and maintaining an insufficient security apparatus to combat Islamist terrorism and Pakistani immigrants.

The Barack Obama-appointed U.S. ambassador in Oslo, Barry White, who is Jewish and received a 2005 award from the pro-Israel American Jewish Committee, complained that the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) rejected two twelve-person British MI-6 intelligence surveillance teams to monitor an “Al Qaeda” cell in Norway. Last November, the Norwegian government was shocked to learn that the U.S. embassy was operating a Surveillance Detection Unit in Oslo that was monitoring Norwegian citizens. Norwegian Justice Minister Knut Storberget said he was not informed of the presence of the U.S. spy unit in Oslo, which employed retired Norwegian police and intelligence officials. The Norwegian Data Protection Commissioner, Bjorn Erik Thon, said he had never seen such an intelligence operation in Norway. White complained that Norwegian security officials were apathetic and incompetent in dealing with the Islamist “terrorist threat.” The failure of the Norwegian SWAT team to quickly respond to the massacre on Utoya may indicate that Norway’s law enforcement and security networks and command-and-control systems had been interfered with by infiltrators with knowledge of the Norwegian systems. Those retired police and intelligence officials working for the U.S. embassy’s surveillance unit are likely suspects in sabotaging the Norwegian police reaction capabilities on 7/22. Just 48 hours before the bombing in Oslo, police units were engaged in a terrorist bombing exercise at the Oslo Opera House, near what would later be “ground zero.” In addition, in the days before the terrorist bombing, there was suspicious sewer work being conducted in the area near the Prime Minister’s office.

In March, the leader of the Socialist Left, Kristen Halvorsen, the Minister of Education of Norway and a former Finance Minister, called for military action against Israel if it attacked Gaza. The Socialist Left and Labor Party, along with the Norwegian Peace Association and the Norwegian energy and telecommunications union, strongly support the Boycott Israel campaign, which includes backing the pan-European Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) committee and an embargo on arms sales to the Jewish state. In August 2010, the Norwegian pension fund divested in two Israeli companies controlled by Israeli billionaire Lev Leviev, Africa Israel Investments and its subsidiary Danya Cebus.

Halvorsen had recently met with a delegation of American Jews who complained about Norway’s “anti-Semitism,” the tired and worn-out canard used by Zionists in confronting anti-Israeli sentiment around the world. In January, Halvorsen and her husband, Christo Halvorsen, a producer for the Norsk Rikskringkasting (NRK) television and radio network, took part in an anti-Israel and U.S. march in Oslo where picket signs with phrases like “USA and Israel: Axis of Evil” appeared. The Halvorsens and NRK were subjected to a vicious campaign launched by Zionists and the Israel Lobby in Norway.

Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre of the Labor Party has been criticized by the Israel Lobby and Zionists for comparing Israel’s treatment of Palestinians to Nazi Germany’s treatment of Jews. Støre has also called for the demolition of Israel’s “Separation Wall” that runs through Palestinian territory on the West Bank, a stance that has earned him enmity and hatred from Israel’s government and their Zionist allies in the West. Store paid a visit to Utoya before the massacre. The Foreign Minister was on the island as some of the Labor Party youth were participating in a “Boycott Israel” demonstration. The city of Trondheim was criticized by Israel for funding a trip to the UN in New York for Norwegian students to participate in a play called the “Gaza Monologues.” Israel also blasted Norway for distributing a film called “Tears of Gaza.”

After Israel offered assistance to Norway, including forensic and medical assistance, as well as the evacuation of the wounded from the 7/22 attack, Norway declined the offer. The rejection of assistance from Israel indicates that the Norwegian government was suspicious of the offer from Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. Other Israeli military teams in the West Bank have been accused of trafficking in human organs, an expose brought to light by the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet in August 2009. That same month, Israel’s anti-Arab and anti-Muslim Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman accused Sweden and Norway of anti-Semitism, adding the outrageous charge that Norway was pro-Nazi, even though Norway’s anti-Muslim and pro-Zionist activists were affiliated with neo-Nazi organizations. On December 11, 2010, a suspicious terrorist explosion took place in downtown Stockholm, injuring two people and blamed on a Swedish-Iraqi suicide bomber. The bombing took place two weeks after the Swedish media reported that a Surveillance Detection Unit, operated form the U.S. embassy in Stockholm, was spying on Swedish citizens.

In the past few months, the Mossad has committed blatant acts of espionage and possible other terrorist attacks against nations it perceives as pro-Palestinian. During last year’s devastating earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, a team of Mossad agents was caught in the city. One of the agents died in the quake. The Mossad agents were found with multiple passports and thumb drives believed to have been used to download sensitive data from New Zealand government computer systems. New Zealand’s Prime Minister John Key, who seemingly came from obscurity in New Zealand politics and whose Jewish mother immigrated from England, disregarded claims of Mossad espionage during the quake, even though he spoke to Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu four times on the day of the quake, after the dead Mossad agent was discovered by New Zealand police and intelligence.

New Zealand’s Southland Times was criticized by New Zealand’s Jewish community and Israel for promoting “conspiracy theories,” the typical modus operandi for pro-Israeli Jews, known as sayanim and katsas, who are used by Israel abroad as propaganda and espionage agents. Ironically, Key was meeting with Obama at the White House as the bombing and shootings were occurring in Norway. Key was believed to have attended the homo-erotic annual meeting of a men-only fraternity composed of American and foreign political and business elitists at the secluded Bohemian Grove in northern California, a conclave that also saw the attendance of Israel’s most notorious agent-of-influence in America, Henry Kissinger, who also serves as Obama’s “special envoy” to the Russian leadership. Key’s Labor Party predecessor, Helen Clark, was the subject of criticism in leaked 2004 State Department cables from the U.S. embassy in Wellington for cracking down on a Mossad team’s acquisition of forged New Zealand passports. Once again, the cable leaks were courtesy of the suspect WikiLeaks operation.

One of the Mossad perpetrators, Zev William Barkan, who fled New Zealand to avoid arrest, had also been reported in the Cambodian capital of Phnom Penh, where he and other Israelis were producing pornographic and “snuff” movies, in which unsuspecting vagrants were murdered on camera.

In Egypt, Mossad agents have been accused by the present government of fomenting riots between Muslims and Coptic Christians. A recent explosion of seized Iranian weapons and ammunition being stored at a Cypriot naval base, a blast that killed the head of the Cypriot Navy, remains suspicious. The blast followed the decision of Cyprus’s left-of-center government to recognize the sovereignty of Palestine. The resulting public outrage over the blast resulted in the resignation of pro-Palestinian Foreign Minister Markos Kyprianou and a major political embarrassment for Cyprus’s president Dimitris Christofias, a member of the Communist AKEL party.

Mossad is a master at false-flag terrorist attacks designed to alter perceptions and punish opponents of Israeli policy. The fingerprints of Israeli intelligence are all over the 9/11 attacks on the United States, the 3/22 train bombings in Madrid, the 7/7 transit bombings in London, and, now, the 7/22 attacks in Norway… While the Israeli-influenced corporate media has droned on and on about the dangers of Islamist terrorism, it is now obvious that the major threat to public safety comes from the State of Israel, a rogue nation that does not hesitate to murder the innocent to achieve its sordid political aims....

This attack stabs at the heart of European integration based on white Christian cultural foundations. I hear the collective voices of Cameron, Sarkozy, Merkel, Van Rompuy, Barroso and Breivik singing "Multiculturalism has failed" in unison while lifting Charlemagne's sword. Now who does this hurt the most? The Frankfurt based Euro monetary system. And who opposes that? The David Hannan's of the UK. And where was Breivik's mentor? London.
"The visitor arrived on your site on Mon Jul 25 at 11:05:14 AM from server IP #109.67.236.28.

Israel flagspacer Geo-location : Israel - Tel Aviv (Tel Aviv)

New : He or she had never been to your site before".....??? LOL
Gilad Atzmon: Massacre in Norway– More About the Jewish Right Wing Connection

Thanks to respected anti-Zionist Jeff Blankfort (who provided me with a crucial link) I have now learned that, just one day before last Friday’s Massacre in Norway, former Trotskyite turned neo-con David Horowitz carried an article by Joseph Klein in his Front Page magazine, entitled “The Quislings of Norway,” which might as well have provided mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik with all the motivation he needed to commit his crime.

You are advised to read the article in full here.....

Here are some of the ‘pearls’ produced by the pro-war Jewish rightwing magazine, just a few hours before Behring Breivik picked up his guns and launched into his lethal journey:

“The infamous Norwegian Vidkun Quisling, who assisted Nazi Germany as it conquered his own country, must be applauding in his grave…In the latest example of Norwegian collaboration with the enemies of the Jews, Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere declared during a press conference this week, alongside Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, that “Norway believes it is perfectly legitimate for the Palestinian president to turn to the United Nations” to seek recognition of an independent Palestinian state.”

“During the Nazi occupation of Norway, nearly all Jews were either deported to death camps or fled to Sweden and beyond. Today, Norway is effectively under the occupation of anti-Semitic leftists and radical Muslims, and appears willing to help enable the destruction of the Jewish state of Israel.”
This link has permitted these monster aberrations from humanity to not only carry out extremely disgusting torture and assassinations but also to do so with a ceremonial fringe benefit while causing fear-based death - they literally suck up the life force of their victims (approximately 8-9 ounces of air-like matter and become energized and motivated towards creating more death. This is what makes psychopaths (like the Bushes) so addicted to the death of kidnapped victims in their basements while they perform rituals of death energy consumption on children and women.

Both Zionism and American fascism learned of these practices immediately after the war during Operation Paperclip when their new guests from the Third Reich suddenly began killing-eating their guards and caretakers because they could no longer control the cold turkey of not being able to cause sacrificial deaths for their consumption.

People, we have to realize that our battle here is not a superficial run-of-the-mill passtime while we wait for the meat to defrost - this is part of some of the heaviest stuff that has ever gone on in the fight for survival that the human race has carried out and that if we are in this as a fun-time activity then our immaturity and our lack of commitment might get us into waters way deeper than we were counting on. These guys - the enemies of humanity for the last thousands of years - are really truly evil specimens in this sector of the galaxy that have literally thrown out babies with bathwater many times while getting rid of traces of human traits like compassion, empathy, kindness and tolerance.
We have all been watching for signs of another coup d'état by the psychopathic Rethuglican fascists since their first (11/22/1963) and their second one in conjunction with the Supreme Court mafia in December 2000. This is beginning to look like the time is ripe and the die is cast and the chips (particularly the military) are down, set and cast. I suspect that we will first be treated to some nasty HAARP phenomena as well as some tectonic movements (probably with atomic weapons) and in the middle of the pseudo-natural disasters the army will declare martial law and clamp down on us and all other freaks that do not like the idea of having our rights trampled by Stormtrooper boots.

This has to be soon because a number of things are becoming unraveled for the demonic elite and as usual, they have no way of controlling things except for more and stricter control over a slave population such as they already have in our ex-land of the free and ex-home of the brave. First their economic default madness game is reaching an end; second the world-wide vote against Zionism is to take place at the UN's GA in September; third Norway now has proof of Mossad tampering in the tragedy they caused; fourth USA is loosing in all wars badly and there is no longer even a chance to keep lying about it; fifth the Tea Party fascists have forgotten that this whole thing was a ruse and now they are taking themselves seriously - retard IQs and underdeveloped cognitive complexes and all. As has happened in previous coups, they will sweep all this mess under the rug while the prostitutepress concentrates on the stories of enemies inside the country which will permit the army and other devils to start using the concentration camps in Iowa and Idaho. The prostitutepress is perhaps the weakest link in the chain - thanks to Murdoch - and if we hit them hard enough this may postpone the whole thing but right now they can still betray us all yet again and cause hundreds of thousands of deaths to their satanic delight.

We have to be careful with our signatures on our computers and to effectively either mask our IP addresses or not use computers during the coup as we will be probably offed by satellite lasers which are ready for mass use. Although the best option will be to get the hell outa Dodge, most of you don't even have passports and I can predict that if this coup is going to happen soon you will no longer be able to get one to use for protection before it.

Maybe I'm wrong and I have been before and none will be happier than me if I am wrong but warning is fair in view of the fact that I have been in many more coups than most by having lived abroad where I watched the methodology developed by our pseudo-intelligence agencies time and again....

Monday, July 25, 2011

On Leadership and Crisis Management.... This mouse could be the elephant in the room.....


It has been said that an elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.... On Leadership and Crisis Management....

This mouse could be the elephant in the room.....

If you intend to read something today or over the weekend, I highly encourage you to read this transcript from Freakonomics Radio from their story "A Mouse in the Salad." Fair warning, it is a little long, but well worth it all the way to the end. You can also find the podcast download here. It is a very interesting and well told story regarding leadership and crisis management.

On Tuesday July 26th the
House Armed Services Committee subcommittee on Military Readiness intends to hold a hearing to explore the future of the aircraft carrier fleet, the depletion of pre-positioned stocks, the grounding of the F-22 fleet, training deficiencies, and unfunded requirements. Admiral Jonathan W. Greenert, General Peter W. Chiarelli, General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., and General Philip M. Breedlove will be giving testimony.

I believe reading "A Mouse in the Salad" before Tuesday will assist folks in setting expectations for the hearing. You'll see what I mean on Tuesday.

A very clever friend of mine described the way the Navy would handle "A Mouse in the Salad."

Navy's answer to a mouse in the salad would have been to initiate a command investigation, then issue a statement that it couldn't comment on an ongoing investigation. The investigation would have been inconclusive, but the waitress would have been fired, the chef censured, the manager promoted, and the customer ignored.
I think that you left out how they are right now designing a new mouse trap that not only will be better than anything else out there but much cheaper. Followed not long after by them trying to explain why it is over budget and behind schedule.







Important words in light of the Murdoch-police caper....


July , 2011 -- Important words in light of the Murdoch-police caper....


http://geraldcelentechannel.blogspot.com/2011/07/tim-alexander-rupert-murdoch-is-mossad.html


"The need for the press to occupy an adversary role was clear to America's founding fathers who sought to pit the ferreters of facts against the mobilizers of opinion."

As the media empire of Rupert Murdoch appears to be dying by a thousands cuts, it is important to focus on the unholy alliance crafted over the decades between Murdoch's media minions, top cops, and senior government officials who traded in surveillance data from law enforcement and other official government sources. This melding of the media and government bears the indelible watermark of fascism in its most cogent definition....

http://mideastshuffle.com/2011/07/23/rupert-murdoch-and-hezbollahs-scuds/

Therefore, the words of the late investigative journalist Jack Anderson, penned on January 1, 1981 in The Washington Post, just a few weeks before the inauguration of Ronald Reagan, should be remembered and heeded. Reagan, incidentally, would do so much to change how the news was reported in the United States, especially in the coverage of the President.

Anderson: "Too many reporters have a tendency . . . to act as explainers and apologists for the officials they cover. This chumminess between the press corps and the power structure pollutes the flow of information to the people. The need for the press to occupy an adversary role was clear to America's founding fathers who sought to pit the ferreters of facts against the mobilizers of opinion.

The role of a free press is to give the people an alternative to the official version of things, a rival account of reality, a measure by which to judge the efficacy of rulers and whether the truth is in them.

Long before our present political parties existed, the role of the village editor and disseminating pamphleteer -- as monitor, arbiter, critic and rival of the politician -- was imbedded as a fundamental of the American system.

It was of this role that Thomas Jefferson spoke in his eternally repeatable declaration if he had to choose between a government without newspapers and newspapers without a government, he would take his morning paper."

What Rupert Murdoch and his worldwide emulators have done is turn the media and some newspapers into organs of right-wing and pro-war governments, from David Cameron, Tony Blair, George W. Bush, and Dick Cheney to Australia's John Howard, Canada's Stephen Harper, and Israel's Binyamin Netanyahu, Ehud Olmert, and Ariel Sharon. Murdoch fused his media interests to those of his favorite politicians. For that, Murdoch has relinquished any claims he has to being a journalist. Murdoch has been proven to be a rank media propagandist in the same mold as Joseph Goebbels, Julius Streicher, and Ilya Ehrenburg.

Some journalists have opined that the attack on Murdoch is an attack against journalism in general. Of course, to believe such a fairy tale is to also believe that Murdoch employs journalists. In fact, journalists are a rare discovery in Murdoch's far-flung empire of public relations flacks, political toadies, and other sundry wastrels...


.


Murdoch's misery, China's delight....?
By Kent Ewing

HONG KONG - How many times have how many Western governments hopped on their favorite soapbox to lecture China on the virtues of press freedom and human rights?

Now, thanks to Rupert Murdoch, the tables are turned. As Murdoch's News Corporation - the world's second-largest media conglomerate, topped only by the Walt Disney Company - teeters under the weight of a phone-hacking and bribery scandal that promises to get worse before it gets better, Chinese state media are reveling in the unseemly spectacle of it all.

Is this where the Western media model leads - to criminal acts by reporters and parliamentary grillings of media executives interrupted by angry pie tosses?

Let's face it, the only person caught up in the Murdoch maelstrom of the past few weeks to have acquitted herself with any semblance of dignity and honor happens to be Chinese. When the svelte and redoubtable Wendi Deng Murdoch, the octogenarian media baron's 42-year-old wife, stymied a parliamentary pie tosser last week with a deft right hook to the nose on the floor of the House of Commons, it was the most impressive move any Murdoch had made for a long time.

His interrogation by British members of parliament may have been, as the elder Murdoch testified, "the most humble day of my life". But it also could have proved to be his most humiliating if he had wound up wearing shaving-foam pie on his face in photos and video seen around the world. Thanks to his wife's quick thinking and athleticism (she used to play volleyball in middle school but clearly saved her best spike in defense of her billionaire husband), he was spared that abasement.

As it stood, the aging tycoon's general cluelessness about what was going on at the News of the World - the best-selling newspaper in his vast stable of media outlets before revelations of phone hacking and bribery by its reporters forced Murdoch to shut it down this month - made him look bad enough. And the arrogant dismissiveness of his son, James, 38, head of News Corp's operations in Europe and Asia, who was trusted to do the lion's share of the talking as father and son sat side by side fielding barbed questions, also did nothing to help the cause.

Only Wendi's spontaneous show of nimble beauty and fierce loyalty saved the hearing from being an unmitigated fiasco for the Murdochs. But she could not save the family and News Corp from becoming convenient whipping boys for everything that is wrong with the West in her native China, where her husband's determined efforts to win favor and become a major media player have been rebuked by Communist Party officials.

And who can blame Chinese commentators for seizing this sensational opportunity to take their revenge? For decades, they have endured lectures from the West about their suppression of the media as part of an ongoing, sweeping condemnation of Beijing's callous disregard for human rights in general; meanwhile, the no-holds-barred, profit-driven media of the West - whose chief symbol is indeed Rupert Murdoch; Disney, the largest corporate purveyor of Western stereotypes and propaganda, somehow mostly gets a pass - has set a daily example of irresponsibility and excess.

It is no surprise that now, with the News of the World in the dock, former reporters at rival tabloids - the Daily Mirror and Sunday Mirror - are stepping forward to admit that they engaged in the same illegal practices as a matter of course. There is no telling where all this will end.

Official publications such as Xinhua, the People's Daily and the Global Times have covered the News of the World scandal in depth and detail, freely offering commentary on how News Corp's current troubles reveal the hypocrisy and empty sloganeering of the Western media and political elite.

"Phone hacking scandal crushing blow to Murdoch empire," one recent Xinhua headline asserted; in another article, the news agency predicted a major overhaul of "the regulatory model of Western media" now that its corrupt and fraudulent nature has been revealed.

"Some experts in Beijing and Shanghai believe that [the scandal] directly exposes the inherent money-seeking nature of Western media today," the agency said, "and the false nature of the concepts of 'freedom', 'impartiality' and 'human rights' that they have long bandied about. As the scandal has continued to develop, it has become a major assault on the model of media supervision and control in the West."

An article in the People's Daily on Thursday reminded readers that British reporters do not have a lock on wayward ethics and conduct in their trade, recalling that virtually every media outlet in the United States jumped on the bandwagon to invade Iraq in 2003 based on what turned out to be false reports that then Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was amassing weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

And Murdoch's Fox News, a de facto arm of the Republican Party and an ardent supporter of the George W Bush administration that perpetrated the WMD myth to launch the Iraq war, was the invasion's loudest and most demonstrative cheerleader.

The Global Times was keen to point out the irony that two of the more high-minded newspapers in Murdoch's stable, The Wall Street Journal and The Australian, have been consistent critics of China's record on human rights and media freedom. Suddenly, their voices have gone silent as their owner finds himself pilloried for the criminal acts of reporters working for one of his decidedly low-minded tabloids.

These criticisms of the West may be overzealous and willfully blind to any of the merits of a free, unfettered media, but they also have the sting of truth. The profit motive often does poison the well of the Western media, and Xinhua's prediction that a new and tougher regulatory regime is in the offing will likely prove true.

That would not necessarily be a bad thing if that new regime sets out to break up media behemoths like News Corp, which has become far too powerful a political player on the world stage, perverting the media's traditional role as watchdog in a system of checks and balances in Western democracies.

But let's be clear: Murdoch is certainly not the first profiteering media mogul to abuse his power. Remember William Randolph Hearst? In 1887, at the age of 23, he burst brazenly onto the American publishing scene when he took over the San Francisco Examiner from his father.

At the peak of his career, Hearst owned nearly 30 newspapers in major American cities. He and arch rival Joseph Pulitzer recklessly boosted circulation and profits at their papers by creating a new kind of titillating but fanciful reporting dubbed yellow journalism, which Hearst used to whip up enthusiasm for American military adventures that eventually led to war with Spain.
In the age of cable television and the Internet, Murdoch, a native of Australia who acquired American citizenship in 1985, has far more power and influence than Hearst ever dreamed of possessing. But now the tycoon's many enemies smell blood, and his empire is under threat. In a fair system of checks and balances, Murdoch and News Corp are due for a huge, ego-shattering check.

That said, there is also a mighty, monopolistic media empire in China. Its aging chief executive officer is the Communist Party. It, too, could use some checks and balances.