Thursday, September 02, 2010

The Cold War-style global "spy games" a return to the past...


September , 2010 -- The Cold War-style global "spy games" a return to the past...

Recent events indicate that there has been a return to global "spy wars" not seen since the heyday of the Cold War....

http://redactednews.blogspot.com/2010/09/is-israel-running-taliban.html

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsmaker/russian-spy-ring/

According to WMR's MI-6 sources, there is a fear that Government Communications Headquarters officer Gareth Williams, whose body was found stuffed in a sports bag in an MI-6 safehouse near the spy agency's Vauxhall headquarters in London and left unattended for some two weeks, may have been involved in an "off-the-books" operation or a non-sanctioned rogue operation.... http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-08/anyone-anywhere-anytime

The latest reports from London are that Williams's body was padlocked inside the sports bag when it was discovered. That, in addition to Williams's cell phones and SIM cards being laid out neatly in his safehouse flat in Pimlico, suggest that his murder was a professional hit. Although two autopsies have been performed on Williams's body, which was in an advanced state of decomposition, no cause of death has yet been determined by medical examiners in London.

MI-6 is now worried that the hit was accomplished by a foreign intelligence agency, however, the reason for his murder remain murky at best. There also have been rumors advanced by some outlets of the British media, but rejected as scurrilous by Williams's family and colleagues, that Williams was involved in gay and bizarre sexual trysts. Gay magazines and photographs were reportedly strewn around Williams's flat, however, such operations have been conducted in the past in order to embarrass the next-of-kin of British agents and politicians from asking too many questions about the circumstances of deaths.

Williams, who worked for GCHQ in Cheltenham and who had, in the past, visited the U.S. National Security Agency station at Menwith Hill, from which signals intelligence operations have been launched against British government officials, including members of the royal family, was on loan to MI-6 and had traveled frequently to the United States, including NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland, on unspecified missions. It is those missions that have MI-6 concerned that one or more operations involving Williams, sanctioned or unsanctioned, may have provided him with knowledge that also placed him on a target list for murder.

WMR has previously reported on BP's video and audio bugging of a Washington, DC condominium owned by Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and allegedly used separately by then-Representative Rahm MOSSAD Emanuel (D-IL) and then-Senator Barack CIA Obama for gay trysts. There are close links between former MI-6 agents, as well as British Special Air Service (SAS) personnel, and BP. The private military contractor, Defense Systems, Ltd. (DSL), which had offices near Buckingham Palace and eventually morphed into ArmorGroup in 1997, conducted special services for BP. DSL counted a number of former MI-6 and SAS personnel among its ranks. WMR previously reported that Williams was also an SAS commando before going to work for GCHQ.

GCHQ has also worked with BP to ensure its communications are secure from the prying ears and eyes of foreign intelligence services, including those of France. It is also known that MI-6 has routinely shared intelligence with nearly every major British firm, including BP. The May 11, 1996, "Weekend Australian" provided a germane quote on such cooperation from an MI-6 agent, "We are a trading nation so our service will do anything we can to help Great Britain Pty Ltd." Intelligence between British intelligence and companies like BP are usually conducted through the Joint Intelligence Committee, however, in overseas locations such cooperation is often done directly. The deal does not come without a price for British companies. As the "Weekend Australian" reported, "British businessmen abroad are expected to pass on to British intelligence anything they come across that they think might be useful...."

Sitting on the board of Russia's Alfa Group's Altimo telecommunication subsidiary is Sir Francis Richards, a former director of GCHQ. Also on the board is Lord Douglas Hurd, a former British Foreign Secretary who was in charge of GCHQ and MI-6 operations while serving as Britain's chief diplomatic official. Also on the Altimo board is Jack Rosen, chairman of the American Jewish Congress and the Council for World Jewry. Alfa Group is a 25 percent owner of the joint Russian-Anglo and British Virgin Islands-registered TNK-BP oil firm. Former BP CEO Tony Hayward, fired from the top post after the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, is now in charge of BP's operations with TNK-BP in Russia.

Although the NSA and CIA, which have both been involved in the investigation of Williams's murder, have separate missions, they combine their operations in a super-secret Special Collection Service (SCS) or F-6, headquartered in Beltsville, Maryland. The SCS conducts "black bag" operations against foreign embassies and missions, as well as private homes and offices. In order to avoid running afoul of domestic laws against such operations without a court order, the UK-USA signals intelligence allies often use the agents from their partners to conduct operations against their own citizens. Canadian and British agents have been used for such purposes in the United States and Americans and Canadians for similar operations in Britain.

Just days after the death of Williams, the Attorney General of the United Kingdom, Dominic Grieve, has ordered the production of the sealed Hutton Inquiry files pertaining to the suspicious "suicide" in July 2003 of Dr. David Kelly, the British Ministry of Defense's leading expert on weapons of mass destruction. Hutton had ordered the files sealed for 70 years but the review of them by Grieve has fueled speculation that a full inquest on Kelly's death may soon be conducted by British government officials. Kelly was the source for a BBC report that the government of Prime Minister Tony Blair had "sexed up" a dossier on Iraq's so-called weapons of mass destruction, weapons that turned out not to exist but were used as a pretext for Britain's participation in the invasion of Iraq.

There is a belief by many in the British intelligence community that Kelly was murdered by professional intelligence agents to ensure his silence from revealing any more about the bogus intelligence used to justify the invasion and occupation of Iraq. WMR previously reported that the murder of Kelly involved members of U.S. special forces covert forces. On November 3, 2007, WMR reported: "On July 17, 2003, Kelly was found dead in a wooded area in his home village of Southmoor. The death was ruled a suicide but this editor was informed by intelligence sources in Paris, where I was the night Kelly was found dead, that he was murdered by 'wet affairs' operatives working for the Blair and Bush interests. Liberal Democratic Member of Parliament Norman Baker, after a one year investigation, also recently concluded that Kelly was murdered." On February 28, 2008, WMR followed up on the report with the following: "WMR has learned from a former British Defense Ministry source that the assassination team that dispatched Diana and Dr. Kelly were not MI-6 but a US Navy SEAL team that operates abroad to target individuals who have been sanctioned for assassination....., except in the Middle East where the White House Murder INC, is housed and operated by Asef SHAWKAT and the Syro-Lebanese Deep State killers, whereby several assassinations took place in Beirut and Damascus since January 24th 2002....on behalf of CIA/MOSSAD....., and the latest of which happened only few weeks ago in Syria, whereby Asef SHAWKAT and the White House Murder INC, assassinated Major-General Yuri Ivanov, 52, who was the deputy head of Russia’s foreign military intelligence arm known as GRU.... It should also be noted that Blackwater USA was largely formed by ex-US Navy SEAL personnel."

The Williams affair and the re-opening of the investigation of Dr. Kelly's death come after a spate of espionage scandals, including the arrest and expulsion of alleged Russian agents in the United States and the murder by Israel's Mossad of a Hamas official in Dubai. The Israelis were using forged and altered passports from a number of nations, including Britain, Ireland, Germany, France, and Australia.

The use of "wet affairs" by intelligence agencies is on a steep increase. The deaths of Williams and Kelly in Britain and, possibly, unknown others around the world, points to a renewed "Cold War" in the intelligence game.....

WMR has also been informed by reliable British intelligence sources that Douglas Hurd's son, Thomas Hurd, a member of the British diplomatic service, actually works for MI-6.

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

R.I.P. ; Gen. Yuri Ivanov, 52, deputy head of GRU .....



R.I.P. ; Gen. Yuri Ivanov, 52, deputy head of GRU .....


I've read about this a couple of days ago at the Yandex's top news links. After that I googled a little in English and found a couple of Turkish sources that wrote about a body of Russian diplomat with the same name was found 13th of August. Today we can read a little more detailed info in the news:

http://lenta.ru/news/2010/08/30/drown/

What's the most unusual and "scary" it's the rank of the officer.....: major general and deputy chief of Russia's military intelligence.... And the place of incident: Syria....Home to the alawite minority thuggish dictatorship and Headquarters to the infamous White House Murder INC, and its CEO Asef SHAWKAT....who is a CIA/MOSSAD agent since January 24th 2002...and the Chief assassin on behalf of CIA/MOSSAD....

Gen. Yuri Ivanov, 52, deputy head of GRU, the Russian military's overseas intelligence arm of Russian military, was found dead in mysterious circumstances....

Major-General Yuri Ivanov, 52, was the deputy head of Russia’s foreign military intelligence arm known as GRU which is thought to operate the biggest network of foreign spies out of all of Russia’s clandestine intelligence services...

His badly decomposed body was found washed up on the Turkish coast by local fishermen earlier this month after he disappeared in the Syrian coastal resort of Latakia further south. The Russian army’s in-house newspaper, Red Star, did not report his death until last Saturday when he was quietly buried in Moscow....

According to the Kremlin, he was on holiday in Syria and died in a tragic swimming accident. However, other reports have suggested he was on official business and the location where he is reported to have disappeared was only about fifty miles from a strategically vital Russian naval facility in the Syrian port of Tartus which is being expanded and upgraded to service and refuel ships from Russia’s Black Sea Fleet....

The facility is Russia’s only foothold in the Mediterranean Sea, and the Siamese twins CIA/ Mossad, Israel’s national intelligence agency, are know to be concerned that Moscow will use the upgraded facility as a base for spy ships and electronic espionage directed at the Middle East.... The port is also close to the Turkish port of Ceyhan, a terminal for the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline which is seen as a lifeline for Georgia, against whom Russia fought a short war in 2008.

The politics of terror as the business of terror: The greatest covert operation ever


The politics of terror as the business of terror: The greatest covert operation ever
By Douglas Valentine

Aug 31, 2010,


The politics of terror are the greatest covert operation ever....

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26283.htm

In explaining why, I’ll begin by defining some terms, because, when discussing the covert op called “the politics of terror,” words and their management are all important.

How are politics and terror actually defined: how are these meanings manipulated; for what purposes, and by whom?

Terrorism is defined as “violence against civilians intended to obtain a political purpose.”

This is an ambiguous phrase, which begs the questions: what are politics and violence?

Politics is defined as “the process by which groups of people make collective decisions.” And violence is the use of force to compel a person or group to do or think something against their will. That includes the violence of words -- of threatening to hurt - and of social structures, as well as the violence of deeds.

So, by definition, terrorism is political violence -- hurting people, or threatening to hurt them, in order to make them govern themselves against their will.

In America, terrorism is always condemned by the government, and, accordingly, America is never a perpetrator of terrorism, but always the victims of it. The US war on terror is the ultimate expression of this principle: it is a military response to terrorism; violence in self-defense, not (ostensibly) violence for a political purpose.

That’s the official story -- the assumption. But I’m going to show that America does engage in terrorism -- violence against civilians for political purposes. This “state” terrorism, however, is covert, in so far as it is equated with national security, and thanks to that built-in ambiguity, it has both stated and unstated purpose.

The state and unstated policy in America

Politics is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions. But who really makes the overarching political decisions in America? Who governs us?

The two political parties represent the people and they compete for control of the government. Republicans generally favor business and Democrats favor labor. The political division is, generally, class based.

Now, the government can be controlled by either political party; but the state endures –

“the state” being the nation’s indispensable industries and infrastructure (banking, auto industry, insurance, Microsoft), and the institutions which defend the nation’s enduring interests: the military, law enforcement, the intelligence & security services.

In Europe they often, cynically, refer to the state as “industry” or Big Business. In America, we tend to call “the state” the Establishment -- an ambiguous word that needs to be defined.

The dictionary defines Establishment as, “An exclusive group of powerful people who rule a government or society by means of private agreements and decisions.”

I would venture to say that the interests of the state and the Establishment are the same, and that the definition of Establishment with a capital E is the pivotal phrase in discussing “state” terrorism..

Consider this: there is the politics of the two parties vying for control of the government, and there is the Establishment, the state, making the covert (ostensibly non-political) decisions that effectively govern America.

Many of those covert decisions concern national security: they are unstated policy.

Moreover, these covert policy decisions about national security are made by people who control the military, law enforcement, and intelligence & security services. These guardians of “the state” are collectively called the National Security Establishment.

Like the Establishment that secretly rules the “state,” the National Security Establishment is an exclusive group that is not accountable to the political whims of the people.

These professional guardians of the state -- the Establishment - are assumed to be above partisan politics. Their loyalty is assumed to be to the law or national security. And that assumption is the Big Lie upon which state terrorism is based.

Yes, it is true that the National Security Establishment is not accountable to the people: and, in fact, it has built a series of ever-larger, concentric moats around itself called the National Security State, precisely to keep the people out of its business.

The National Security Establishment rules the National Security State, with an iron fist, but it is pure propaganda that the National Security Establishment and State are not political.

In order to get inside the National Security Establishment, and rise to a position of authority within it, one must be born there (like Bush -- make a billion like Gates), or submit to years of right-wing political indoctrination calibrated to a series of increasingly restrictive security clearances.

Political indoctrination -- adopting the correct right-wing ideology -- and security clearances represent the drawbridge across the moats.

The National Security State is the covert social structure of the Establishment, and it has as its job not just defending the Establishment from foreign enemies, but also expanding the Establishment’s economic and military influence abroad, while preserving its class prerogatives at home.

By “class prerogatives,” I mean the National Security State is designed to keep the lower class from exerting any political control over the state; especially, redistributing the Establishment’s private wealth.

To these unstated ends -- imperialism abroad and repression at home -- the National Security State engages in terrorism -- political violence -- on behalf of the Establishment.

Indeed, the National Security State is political violence, terrorism, in its purest form.

The Establishment and its National Security State as terrorism

The lower classes in America have little voice in making government or state policy. Some are hopeless, others content, but, in either case, voter turnout is a mere 54 percent.

Whether hopeless or content, they know they cannot fight conventional thinking. For example, when the Establishment exerts its influence, it is not considered politics; it is simply the status quo. The rich create jobs and must be accommodated with trillion dollar bailouts, paid for by workers taking furloughs.

That’s just the way it is. Politicians in the service of the Establishment, for overarching reasons of national security, have to keep the capitalist financial system afloat.

It is the same thing with the National Security Establishment: America invaded Iraq, and there was nothing the people do about it. The decision was made for them. Peace activists, least of all, had no voice in the decision, because they are assumed to have no stake in national security. You will not find peace activists in the National Security Establishment; and that political repression is covert state terrorism.

Likewise, if labor seeks to exercise influence, its efforts are described as exploiting the state for more than it deserves, because it does not have an enduring stake in the state.

It is a fact: only Establishment wealth -- ownership - is equated with national security.

Consider the immortal words of Leona Helmsley: “Only the little people pay taxes.”

That injustice in the tax code is political repression and, in so far as it makes the people fearful, it is state terrorism. The Establishment fears losing its loopholes, while workers and the poor fear losing their homes: two types of terror, one for each class, one stated, one unstated.

The Establishment engages imperialism and political repression through propaganda (word management violence) and social structures. This state terrorism is unstated, covert.

Only when the people rebel and challenge the Establishment is the word terrorism applied.

Likewise, the military, police or intelligence causes of rebellion, or responses to it, are never called terrorism: they are national security.

And that’s how the management of words helps to repress the lower classes.

Language and the psychology of state terror

America’s industrial sized war machine was never said to terrorize Iraq; the invasion was not political -- because the war machine is owned by the Establishment.

The Establishment profiting from war is not politics; it is ideological neutral “profits.”

In fact, America exerts its unwanted political influence overseas, through the state terror of aircraft carrier fleets, bombers, nuclear subs, shock and awe invasions, pacification programs, the overthrow of governments, and support of repressive puppet regimes.

This state terrorism, which you never hear about, is the biggest covert psychological warfare operation of all time.

This psy-war operation depends on narrowly defining terrorism as a suicide bomber, a hijacked plane, the decapitated body of a collaborator: the “selective terrorism” of rebels and nationalists who, outgunned, and outlawed in their own country, have no other options, other than submission.

The purpose of selective terror is psychological: to isolate collaborators, while demonstrating to the people the ability of the rebels to strike at their oppressors.

Shock and Awe, and brutal pacification cam­paigns -- state terrorism -- prevent people from making a living -- selective terrorism does not.

That’s a big, meaningful “class” difference.

The National Security Establishment understands that selective terror achieves political and psychological goals that state terror does not -- that it rallies people to revolutionary ideals. So the National Security Establishment engages in selective terror too, by targeting the rebel, his family and friends in their homes.

This is the selective terror con­ducted by counter-terrorists. But don’t be confused: it is terrorism. All terror is psychological and political; state terror by immobilizing people and making them responsive, submissive, apathetic, and/or ostensibly “content.”

The National Security Establishment fully understands that once people have been terrorized, they have been politically defeated, without necessarily receiving bullets.

As former Director of Central Intelligence William Colby once said: “The implication or latent threat of terror was sufficient to insure that the people would comply.”

This principle of the psychological use of “the implication or latent threat of terror” is what brings us back to America and the business of terror.

The business of terror

State terror -- colonization abroad and political repression at home -- is a key means of extracting profits and maintaining ownership of property. Ask the American Indian.

In its colonies, the US engages in state terrorism by removing all legal protections for rebels; detention, torture, and summary execution are the price for rebellion against US policy.

State terrorism overseas, imperialism, is never acknowledged by the media, because the media is a big business; indeed, two of the major networks are owned by defense contractors.

And state terrorism applied domestically to ensure “internal” security is never acknowledged -- America says it has no political prisoners. But the National Security State is well thought out by professionals in language management, and political and psychological warfare, aimed at you.

“Personal violence is for the amateur in dominance,” says two-time Nobel Prize winner Johan Galtung, but “structural violence is the tool of the professional. The amateur who wants to dominate uses guns; the professional uses social structure. The legal criminality of the social system and its institutions, of government . . . is tacit violence. Structural violence is a structure of exploitation and social injustice.”

As Colby said: “The implication or latent threat is enough to insure people will comply.”

The war on terror and its domestic version “homeland security” are the law of the land -- America’s new legally criminal social structure based on administrative detention, enshrined in The Patriot Act and a number of executive orders, some secret.

This lack of due process comes on top of a justice system already skewed to protect the propertied elite and pack the prisons with the poor, through “structural violence,” mainly the drug wars.

The Establishment’s new anti-terror and anti-drug laws make the National Security State the most fearsome covert political and psy-war machine the world has ever seen. And the National Security State is growing: the “Top Secret America” series in the Washington Post put it at 750,000 cadres.

This secret state within a state extends into the homeland’s critical infrastructure and beyond. For example, the arms industry provides good jobs, making American imperial aggression seem a positive value.

And this is how the psyched-out people become one of the moats.

As it is modeled on the totalitarian corporate paradigm, the National Security State in al its manifestations fits the classic definition of a fascist dictatorship. And we know what its intentions are. They have been stated.

In the days after 9-11, right-wing Republican stalwart Kenneth W. Starr, the Clinton inquisitor, said the danger of terrorism requires “deference to the judgments of the political branches with respect to matters of national security.”

But is there an on-going emergency that requires deference to the political branches, meaning the right-wing ideologues who rule the National Security State? And what does it mean for Establishment opponents if due process is completely abandoned at home, and subjected to politics?

Michael Ledeen, a former counter-terror expert on Reagan’s National Security Council, blamed 9-11 on Clinton “for failing to properly organize our nation’s security apparatus.”

Ledeen’s solution to the problem of those who sneered at security was “to stamp out” the “corrupt habits of mind.” By which he means Liberalism.

In other words, the reactionary right wing that owns the National Security State wants to impose its total rule on the people in order to create a security conscious, uniform citizenry -- marching in lock step, flags waving - that is necessary to win the war on terror.

This is how the National Security professionals are incrementally creating the requisite fascist social structure -- through terror, the best organizing principle ever.

“This is time for the old motto, ‘kill them all, let God sort ’em out.’ New times require new people with new standards,” Ledeen asserted. “The entire political world will understand it and applaud it. And it will give us a chance to prevail.”

When Ledeen says “political” world, he means the “owners of the business” of state terror, the right-wing ideologues who pack the National Security State and the capitalist Establishment they serve.....


And they have won the propaganda war, folks......

Doug Valentine is the author of “The Phoenix Program” and his latest book is “The Strength of the Pack: The Personalities, Politics and Espionage Intrigues That Shaped The DEA.” Please visit his website at www.members.authorsguild.net/valentine/bio.htm.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

The Utterly corrupt United Nations, UN, from Oil For Food in Iraq, to Kosovo/Serbia, to UNIFIL in South Lebanon




بس حتى يعرفوا اللبنانية انو كل موظفوا الامم المتحدة عملاء في خدمة إسرائيل والمحكمة اولهم
دليل اخر على تواطؤ الامم ضد لبنان وشعبه مقابل بقاء السنيورة بسبب التسهيلات التي امنها لهم هذا القذر

....
http://www.al-akhbar.com/2006war_cables

The Utterly corrupt United Nations, UN, from Oil For Food in Iraq, to Kosovo/Serbia, to UNIFIL in South Lebanon....among whom resides hundreds of Military Intelligence thugs working for CIA/MOSSAD/DIA/AMAN....etc. spying or attempting to spy on Hezbollah's valiant Resistance combatants throughout South Lebanon and way Beyond into all of Lebanon.....

The following is but one example in a war zone.....

I am familiar with the Gorazde area - northern Bosnia on the Serb border. Lots of rural Muslims, they got hit very hard by the war, too close to Serbia. These "safe areas" got wholesale sold down the river by the UN, a "safe area" guarded by UN was the worst place you could end up being trapped in. People view the UN as a good thing to come help in a war. They were the unholiest thing to happen to that war. They abetted the slaughter, they traded humanitarian goods to the aggressor to maintain their privileged role, they bought children as sex slaves, it is very ugly. I have to admit that I had to laugh every time I heard one of their dumb convoys got robbed because their convoys did far more business with the aggressor than real people in need who never mattered to them but the townspeople got good at making some loud artillery noises over a UN convoy, chasing the UN guys out on foot and emptying a convoy to feed their villages. The idiots were useless and ornery anyway.

This here is the movie I said awhile ago to go watch - next time you are in your video place, go to foreign films, find "No Man's Land", done about 80% in Serbian with subtitles, rest English/German. Made by a Bosnian Muslim filmmaker, the only "real" movie about the war eve made. This is what it looked like, this also shows the role of the traitorous UN very well, the UN is a central part of the movie. Do rent it, you won't regret it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YL8IF6431n4


Here is actually the whole movie, cut up in 10 parts if you want to hassle with following a 1-10 Youtube full movie ct up into 10 parts of 10-minutes or so each but here is where it starts, follow next one from there. It is so very revealing of the UN and also how idiotic the psychology of war was. It won best movie in Cannes 2001, really good movie.....

From the Talmudgraph ..... no less....:

It is a well known fact that US foreign policy has not been kind to the region. The US has not operated as honest broker between itself and other Arab countries. Its "special" relationship with Israel has caused an imbalance of relations and distrust. This is aggravated further by the fact that Arab leaders are not united in their stance. Innocent civilians have bore the brunt of US and Israeli military power, coupled with repressive Middle Eastern regimes and you have a volatile mix of politics in a region that will remain unstable for a long time to come unless the US changes the way it conducts itself. The US and Israel need to take a serious hard look at their own fragile Democracies before they point fingers at others. The wars in the Middle East have devastated the region and there is no justifiable excuse for the massive amount of death and destruction.....

The problem, of course, is that it is not a hoax. And the pompous way in which La Clinton felt it necessary to explain to us the difference between embassy cables (which have a certain relationship to reality, if not always very literate) and the policy papers that emerge from her own diminished office told us almost as much as the CIA/WikiLeaks horde..... For this lady, who could not write her own autobiography, ordered – and still I have to shake my head to believe this – her flunkies to spy on the United Nations.

That La Clinton should want her State Department slaves to play secret agents on the poor old UN donkey – the beast that forever clip-clops on stage to mop up America's failed policies in the Middle East, this decrepit skyscraper on the East River packed with enough asbestos to kill a nation of peacekeepers, this bureaucratic shambles with its pathetic Secretary-General whose English is still in need of vast improvement – shows what an utterly worthless institution the US State Department has become.

They were supposed to spy on the encryption details of delegates, credit card transactions, even frequent flyer cards. But who would want to read the nonsense that the UN's overpaid staff write, or how much they spend on lunch at Nobu's with the Nicaraguan consul, or who paid for whose mistress to fly to Havana on the shavings of his UN flights?

A long time ago, Air France agreed to hand over its frequent flier details to American spooks – so why do they want this stuff all over again? And why spy on the UN when they are the most leak-prone organization on the globe? I once received so many identical copies of confidential "sit-rep" reports from UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon – retired Irish Lieutenant-General William Callaghan is my witness – that I had to plead with UN soldiers not to send me so many....


The United Nations is a sick joke that has only grown more obscene over time. The hidden agenda of the UN is more than apparent in the continuing double-standards concerning anyone in "Club USA," and the rest of the world. If you are in the club than you can do anything to anybody you want and the world press will not utter a line in protest. If you are not in the club, then anything that the good old USA does to you is nobody's concern. UN Sec. Gen. Moon is a fucking hypocrite, issuing a warning to Mideast authoritarians, which doesn't apply to the worst "authoritarians" of them all, the House of Saud. The United Nations is a stinking tool of global fascists hell-bent on bringing all of the world under the umbrella of the American dictatorship. The UN's sole purpose is to underwrite American aggression on the rest of the world, under the guise of humanitarianism.

Bombing the hell out of all Libyans who oppose the American-created "rebel forces" is an extremely "humanitarian" gesture. Humanity has been given a common cause--defeat the enemies of the new "American Reich."

The "Fourth Reich" is fully "MADE IN AMERICA." Good luck, when the rest of you assholes supporting this latest aggression wake-up and hear the fists of the "New Order" banging upon your door. As you are handcuffed, hooded and beaten senseless, before being dragged-off into the night, amid the muffled screams of your family, whom you will probably never see again, think of how you supported the parade to bomb Libya and to wipe-out most of the Muslim world....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ElnNxGj_Ts&feature=related