AIPAC should be registered under FARA. The fact that it is not so registered is a mockery of American law....

AIPAC should be registered under FARA. The fact that it is not so registered is a mockery of American law....

http://original.antiwar.com/smith-grant/2011/04/27/washington-showdown-with-aipac/

"Fallout from criminal indictments of AIPAC staffers caught red-handed trafficking classified information in 2004-2005 that were quietly unwound under mysterious judicial rulings and even more DOJ acquiescence in 2009 has put AIPAC’s activities under a new spotlight. AIPAC briefly considered a media campaign to smear US law-enforcement officials but instead cut its losses by dumping Rosen. This led to Rosen’s $20 million retaliatory defamation lawsuit which opened up shocking new insights about AIPAC. In 2010, true to form, AIPAC let loose a salvo of pornography and prostitution charges — which succeed more in revealing AIPAC’s decrepit work environment than anything about its former top executive-branch lobbyist. But the secret that AIPAC is an organization that has been breaking US laws since its emergence from the AZC in 1963 is now officially "out of the bag." The list of US classified documents stolen and misused by AIPAC grew larger in 2010, even as the IRS is again asked to retroactively revoke AIPAC’s tax exemption."

Another former insider is spilling his guts:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2011/06/aipac-from-the-inside-1-isolating-iran.html#ixzz1PIWiReah

"The reason why I want to tell this story now is, we may be going down a path, helped along by the American Jewish community, and maybe even Israel, that is going to be worse even than the one we're on now - some sort of military confrontation with Iran. That worries me. Because they will be able to blame [it] on the Jews, to a great extent," says Weismann, who worked at AIPAC from 1993 until 2005, much of that time as the group's deputy director of foreign policy. Though Weismann disagrees sharply with those who say that AIPAC played a critical role in pushing for the 2003 U.S. decision to invade Iraq, he believes a war with Iran -- which he says "would be the stupidest thing I ever heard of" -- might well be blamed on AIPAC's leaders and their constituents . "What the Jews' war will be is Iran," he says. "Not Iraq."

Lawrence Davidson, a history professor who I infer from the piece is himself Jewish, presents in Counterpunch today a truly grim picture of where he fears Israel may be headed demographically, and thus politically. http://bit.ly/lQxusv The very fact that such a scenario is on the radar screen within the Jewish community itself makes it essential that the USA begin at least partially decoupling the joined-at-the-hip relationship.

So far the only Jews who are speaking up against the Zionist Israel and its appendages like AIPAC are the Ultra-Orthodox Anti-Zionist Jews. Every time that the Anti-Zionist Jews speak up, the AIPAC tentacles makes sure that they are either muffled/drowned out/made sure that there is no media coverage of their Anti-Zionist-Anti-Israel protests.

Same thing happens on the Christian side as the Zionist Christians like Hagee/Robertson, etc. muffle out any other Christians who dare to speak out against the situation at hand.

The AIPAC crowd also have the U.S. medias and U,S. Federal/State/Local judicial and law enforcement sewn up to ensure that the Anti-Zionist/Anti-Israel/Anti-AIPAC crowd make no traction in the courts/legal avenues.

In short, we the U.S. are screwed, and the only part of our government with the capacity to stand up to Israel and its AIPAC appendages is DoD. Israel's government through their stoolies are working 24/7 to try and make sure that DoD's hands are tied and their complaints muffled....

CIA's covert programs in Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Pakistan relying on old tactics.....

CIA's covert programs in Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Pakistan relying on old tactics.....

The CIA's real Jason Bournes.... As far as the continuing global threat, the major cause of this is Israhell and its militarized colony, the USSA....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Opn9Dg2zSnQ&feature=player_embedded

Siamese twins CIA/MOSSAD sharing the same brain....and Washington's civilian and military spheres are increasingly conjoined, with romanticized views of war and a garrison mentality eroding the traditional system of checks and balances that curtailed military ambition and insane spending. With civilian agencies militarizing themselves, citizen-soldiers morphing into full-time warriors and embassies becoming fortresses for utter spying on a global scale, is a militaristic future of jackboots and kamikazes so far in the future?

By exaggerating threats, defining all responses to those threats in military terms, dismissing dissenters as weak and deluded (even when they prove right), and being incapable of questioning their principles, they repeat the same mistakes again and again.....

Until Americans turn away from militarism and learn again how to "support the constitution" more than US troops (and don't worry: those troops swear an oath to that very constitution), until they return to a broader vision of national security that deemphasizes a garrison mentality, they will continue to wound, perhaps mortally, a once great republic, before the advent of the Infamous White House Murder INC, in the Levant and worldwide with the Clean Break gang of assassins in 96.

And that's no fairy tale, it's a fact...

Some are saying, 'The rise of a “democratic” Muslim Brotherhood with the support of the West would mean that Syria no longer belongs to the Shiite bloc'....?

This may have been true once but seems less likely now.....

Iran has gained an awful lot since 2000. In Iraq it has gained a partner with the Shiites easily dominating, now that the Sunni dictatorship has ended. Iraq alone gives Iran a huge amount of strategic depth into the Middle East that it didn't have between 1979-2002.

Hezbollah has risen to full political and military power in Lebanon. Bahrain may present Iran to get its toe in the door of the Arabian peninsula. Finally Egypt is more likely to be more independent than previously.

But on the Syria question itself there is a lot of grays. Could be that Syria if Assad goes will still be friendly towards Iran. After all Syria is going to remain as Anti Israel as ever because that is the will of the Syrian people who want the Golan back.... Also Syrian military must know that continuing to supply weapons to Hezbollah will allow them some continuing power in Lebanon....

Finally with Turkey I don't see it moving all that far away from Iran. In fact trade has been increasing and there is the Tabriz Ankara pipeline, Nabucco and all the wriggling about Iran on that one and the proposed Persian Pipeline which will pipe gas from the Fars gas-field in Iran over Turkey and into Europe ending in Switzerland.

Turkey ain't gonna move away from Iran. Syria's foreign policy with regards to Israel seems popular with the people and unlikely to change. Egypt will likely be more independent. Iran has gained a lot of control within Iraq....

The idea of Iran suffering "diplomatic isolation" is not even a threat....

Israhell is asking for more money from the Bankrupt USSA....

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/184460.html

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/06/treasury-whines-about-cost-of-ron-pauls.html

http://battleland.blogs.time.com/2011/06/13/haunted-by-homicide-federal-grand-jury-investigates-war-crimes-and-torture-in-death-of-the-ice-man-at-abu-ghraib-and-other-alleged-cia-abuses/

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/06/13/137151762/report-6-6b-meant-for-iraq-may-be-largest-theft-in-u-s-history