Saturday, April 11, 2009

Scientists Confirm Large Quantities of Thermite in World Trade Center Dust...

Scientists Confirm Large Quantities of Thermite in World Trade Center Dust...

The below paper, published in a peer-reviewed chemical physics journal
and authored by nine scientists working in laboratories at multiple
universities using state-of-the-art equipment, confirms the presence
of large quantities of metal microspheres of reacted thermite, and
flakes (chips) of unreacted (i.e., still active) super-thermite (also
called nano-thermite, which is thermite which has been made even more
reactive by decreasing the thermitic particle size down to the
nanometer range), in different dust samples from the collapsed World
Trade Center (W.T.C.) towers collected from multiple people at
different sites even before cleanup operations began. The physical and
chemical properties of these microspheres and flakes were analyzed
using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (S.E.M.), X-ray
energy dispersive spectroscopy (X.E.D.S.), and differential scanning
calorimetry (D.S.C.), among other methods....

Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank
M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and
Bradley R. Larsen, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from
the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," Open Chemical Physics
Journal, Vol. 2 (2009), pp. 7-31. (A
video cited in the article.)

For more information on the background on this paper, including the
extensive research that went into it and the rigorous peer-review
process that it underwent, I highly recommend everyone here listen to
the below interview of Dr. Steven E. Jones, one of the paper's
authors. Also available below is an interview of Kevin R. Ryan,
another author of the paper.

"Special Report: Thermite Fingerprint," Michael Wolsey, Visibility
9/11, April 3, 2009.

Below are two other peer-reviewed papers which also pertain to the
presence of large quantities of thermite in the dust of the collapsed
W.T.C. towers:

Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley and Steven E. Jones, "Environmental
anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic
materials," The Environmentalist, August 4, 2008.

Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti
and James R. Gourley, "Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official
Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction," Open Civil
Engineering Journal, Vol. 2 (2008), pp. 35-40.

In addition to the presence of large amounts of thermite in the dust
of the collapsed W.T.C. buildings, another truly vital piece of
evidence that provides definitive proof that the W.T.C. towers were
brought down by controlled demolition are the videos of yellow-hot
molten metal seen cascading off the South Tower (World Trade Center
Tower 2).

That piece of evidence isn't merely a smoking gun: it's a smoking
nuclear cannon. Those videos, alone and by themselves, are
irrefragable proof that the South Tower (at the very least) had
thermite-like ("like" in the sense of producing comparable
temperatures) incendiary demolition charges with the ability to easily
slice through structural steel going off within it. There is no
innocent explanation for what those videos record.

That is to say, the only way to get around that it is thermite which
is causing that yellow-hot metal to cascade off the South Tower before
its collapse would be to posit that we are seeing a different form of
extremely powerful incendiary with thermite-like temperatures at work
in the videos. Of which, even if true, would be every bit as much
damning, since no such powerful incendiaries can be accounted for
without involving a sinister intent to plant them there.

Below are four videos which contain some of this footage:

"Shot from street level of South Tower collapsing," CameraPlanet,
Google Video.

"Wtc 1, impact site close up, tower collapse close up, long shot,
people shouting," CameraPlanet, Google Video.

From the color of the yellow-hot molten metal seen cascading off the
South Tower, it had to be at least over 1000 °C (as the temperature of
an incandescent object is exhibited by its color), yet jet fuel burns
in open air at 260-315 °C; nor do burning office, building, or plane
materials impart temperatures anywhere near that hot to structural
members (indeed, it would present quite a hazard if such articles were
constructed with such powerful incendiaries, and so designers of such
objects go out of their way to make sure that they are not). Thus, if
it wasn't molten iron from thermite that we are seeing come off the
South Tower, then by necessity a reaction source with a heat intensity
very much like thermite had to be present. Yet there is nothing in the
U.S. government's account that can explain such a heat source; indeed,
there's nothing innocent that could explain it, since it requires some
sort of extremely powerful incendiary.

For more on this, see the below paper by Steven E. Jones (Ph.D.;
physicist and archaeometrist; former professor in the Department of
Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University):

"Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?," Dr. Steven E.
Jones, Journal of 911 Studies, Vol. 3 (September 2006). (Older

See also:

"Experiments to test NIST 'orange glow' hypothesis," Steven E. Jones,
Ph.D., August 31, 2006

"Experiments with Molten Aluminum," Steven E. Jones with Wesley
Lifferth, Jared Dodson, Jacob Stevenson and Shannon Walch, circa June

"A description of molten aluminum poured onto rusty steel," Wes
Lifferth, Physics Shop, Brigham Young University, Journal of 9/11
Studies, Vol. 9 (March 2007).

Moreover, even the official FEMA scientists Jonathan Barnett, Ronald
R. Biederman, and R. D. Sisson, Jr. bolster the evidence that thermate
(i.e., thermite with sulfur added, which causes it to slice through
steel even faster by forming a eutectic alloy with it) was used to
bring down the W.T.C. towers (see "Appendix C: Limited Metallurgical
Examination" in World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data
Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 403, May 2002 ):

Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel,
including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent inter granular
melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. ...
No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.
The rate of corrosion is also unknown.

And in the below paper it is conclusively proved via chemical analysis
using scanning electron microscopy (S.E.M.), X-ray energy dispersive
spectroscopy (X-E.D.S.), and wavelength dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(W.D.S.), that large quantities of thermite analogs (such as thermate)
were used in the destruction of the World Trade Center towers:

"Revisiting 9/11/2001--Applying the Scientific Method," Dr. Steven E.
Jones, Journal of 911 Studies, Vol. 11 (May 2007).

See also the below on additional physical remains of thermite (in the
form of unreacted flakes of thermite) from the demolished World Trade
Center, collected even before clean-up operations began:

"Announcing a discovery: Red/gray bi-layered chips in the WTC dust,"
ProfJones (Steven E. Jones),, December 22, 2007.

"Dr. Steven E. Jones Boston 911 Conference 12-15-07 Red chips," Google Video, December 21, 2007.

Further, the below paper documents the connections between the people
at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
responsible for investigating the collapse of the W.T.C. buildings and
the rarefied military-intensive field of super-thermites. The glaring
implication being that those responsible for executing the technical
aspects of the controlled demolition of the W.T.C. (on behalf of those
who control the U.S. government) are the same people in charge of
investigating the cause of the collapses. Thereby killing two birds
with one stone: using the same technical-echelon team which collapsed
the towers to subsequently collapse any authentic investigation into
what caused the collapse of the towers--as these people aren't going
to tell on themselves. (To date NIST has refused to examine the
remains of the W.T.C. for evidence of explosives or thermite, despite
repeated requests for such an examination and despite such analysis
being specified in NFPA 921, "Guide for Fire and Explosion
Investigations," National Fire Protection Association.)

"The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites," Kevin R.
Ryan, Journal of 9/11 Studies, Vol. 22 (July 2, 2008).


James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist," Social Science Research
Network (SSRN), revised and expanded edition, March 19, 2009 (originally
published December 19, 2001)

Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information on
Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theory and the quantum gravity Theory
of Everything [TOE])

Thursday, April 09, 2009

There is no Confrontation whatsoever looming between U.S. and Israel, they are just playing good cop bad cop politics for gullible middle easterners.

There is no Confrontation whatsoever looming between U.S. and Israel, they are just playing good cop bad cop politics for the gullible middle easterners....until the next False flag to come occurs in earnest....and it will be pinned on Hezbollah and revenge for Imad F. Moughnieh's assassination.....watchout!!!

According to senior State Department sources, a major disinformation/confrontation is looming between the United States and Israel over policies ranging from Palestine to Iran.....[ State Department is a hot bed of CIA disinformation con artists, just like both houses of congress are ...]

The new Likud/Yisrael Beiteinu government of Israel is pushing an agenda that runs counter to longstanding U.S. policies in the Middle East. Yisrael Beiteinu party chairman Avigdor Lieberman, the new Israeli Foreign Minister, is seen by one State Department source as an "Eastern European fascist who practices racism."

State Department sources are now convinced that what has been called the "Israel Lobby" in Washington will soon morph into an even more problematic "Likud/Lieberman Lobby" that will push a pro-war and pro-settler policy within the Congress and the Barack Obama administration. This new and more aggressive lobby will particularly use its control over Representatives Steve Israel (D-NY) and Mark Kirk (R-IL), as well as Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), to ensure that Israel's new policies are conveyed to and acted upon by White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Obama senior policy adviser David Axelrod.

However, there are several potential breaking points between the Obama administration and the new Israeli government, according to State Department sources. One will be U.S. interaction with Hamas, the duly-elected government of Palestine. The term of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has elapsed and actual legitimate power in Palestine belongs to Hamas. This political fact means that the United States has no choice but to talk directly to Hamas.

There is also the issue of Hamas being a party that favors the ballot box over traditional Middle East power grabs, whether they are by princes, generals, religious figures, or plain thugs. According to State Department sources, Hamas has even lectured Lebanon's Hezbollah, which they claim in the past was generally opposed to achieving power through elections in Lebanon, to become more democratic. That change has occurred, according to the sources, with Hezbollah now fully engaged in the democratic process.

The popularity of Hamas, especially in the wake of Israel's genocidal war against Gaza, has alarmed the governments of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and, to a lesser extent, Jordan, because of its zeal for winning power through elections and not coups. State Department sources say that if Egypt had fair and democratic elections, the Muslim Brotherhood, which spun off Hamas in Palestine, would win handily and the Hosni Mubarak dictatorship would come to and end. The same situation exists in Saudi Arabia, where the Saud family is nervous about the popularity of Hamas and views it as a potential threat to the House of Saud.

State Department personnel are aware from field observations that the Fatah movement of Abbas in Palestine is viewed by most Palestinians as corrupt and thuggish while Hamas is seen as clean, vigorous, and appealing.

Another confrontation that looms between the United States and Israel concerns Israel's 200 nuclear weapons. With the United States engaged in direct nuclear talks with Iran and Saudi Arabia calling for an international regime to supply nuclear fuel for power plants along with safeguards that such technology cannot be converted to weapons development, there is also the likelihood that there will be a major push to create in the Middle East a nuclear-free zone. If the United States buys into such a plan, it will mean Israel will have to dismantle its nuclear arsenal. Given what State Department officials describe as Israel's suicidal "Masada complex," such a plan will be next to impossible to enact given the current drift of Israel to more theocratic and right-wing rule. As one State Department source put it, "WE cannot address the Iranian nuclear program without addressing the Israeli nuclear weapons program."

U.S. intelligence officials are also prepared to stop considering intelligence that comes to the CIA and other agencies from Mossad and other Israeli intelligence elements. The new team taking over at the Directorate of National Intelligence and the CIA are acutely aware that the Israelis have, as one insider put it, "a long history of deceptive dissemination of disinformation" to U.S. intelligence officials, adding that while some foreign sources have "inadvertently provided bad intelligence, Israel has been deliberately dishonest....." that's utter bullshit, courtesy of the Siamese twins CIA/MOSSAD for 3 decades....

U.S. defense officials also note that Israel cannot attack Iran without U.S. collusion. The United States controls the airspace over both Iraq and the Persian Gulf and any Israeli air assault would require U.S. approval. Under the present administration, that scenario is unlikely WMR is told. "The only way Bibi Netanyahu will attack Iran is if he is assured that Iran will respond by hitting U.S. military forces in the region forcing a U.S. military response," one official told WMR. The official added, "Israel, on its own, cannot wage a sustained air campaign against Iran." Vice President Joe Biden recently warned Israel from conducting any military action against Iran....


AIPAC trial and an Update of past events: Two AIPAC employees have been on trial for spying on the US and giving classified information to Israel. They were indicted in 2005 and so far here have been the trail dates for the case that threatens the most powerful foreign lobby (which is not registered as a foreign agent, even though attorney general RFK ordered that they should register but then somebody shot him)

April 20th 2006
May 23rd 2006
August 7th 2006
October 7th 2006
June 4th 2007
September 19th 2007
Janurary 16th, 2008!
April 29th 2008
Now May 27 2009 (maybe)

On top of that Steve Rosen on of the two agents on trial, is suing AIPAC for 5 million dollars. Rosen and his fellow AIPAC employees Keith Weissman were caught taking classified information in meetings with Lawrence Franklin and employee for Douglas Feith Under Secretary of Defense for Policy who met with uncleared Israeli generals in the DoD in the run up to the war in Iraq and who created a special office called the office of special plans which cherry picked information and passed on known false information from Israel to the office of the vice president. Franklin was sentenced to 12 years in jail. Feith resigned. And Rosen is suing AIPAC. The information that Israel took pertained to Iraq and Iran's capacities to make nuclear weapons. It was essential to know what the US knew and more importantly what they did not know about Iraq in Iran in order for the Israelis to cook up cases for war.
[ . . . ]

Back when AIPAC was illegally gathering Intel on what the US knew and didn't know about Iraq AND Iran's nuclear capacities, a branch of the CIA working on tracking nuclear weapons proliferation was actively trying to figure out what the truth was. In this process they uncovered something else. Employees of the American government were illegally selling arms. The Nexus of the trade went through the ATC (American Turkish Council) a lobby for the Military industrial complex which benefited greatly from the Iraq war, and is located in the gateway of the drug trade from the "liberated" poppy fields of Afghanistan to Europe. The ATC is basically a miniature AIPAC with all the same players involved. And FBI whistle blower named Sibel got wind of these dealing through translating and before she could come out with it she had a gag order slapped on her and she was threatened with jail time....

Neoconservatives backing Obama's foreign policy

"Some may notice that the neo-conservatives who masterminded the policy of global interventions are not complaining about the level of military and foreign spending. This is because rather than drawing down our costly interventions, Obama is largely staying the course on these issues. In fact, this week a group of leading neoconservatives met to discuss how best to support the President on foreign policy! I am disappointed and concerned that, in spite of a change in leadership, we will remain the policeman of the world, placing ourselves at grave danger in many ways."

The article's author writes,

"Now, it's your turn to sound off...Does Obama really represent change?"

There are 130 responses so far.

With withdrawal of Chas Freeman as National Intelligence Council chairman, the Intelligence Community loses big

With withdrawal of Chas Freeman as National Intelligence Council chairman, the Intelligence Community loses big...?

We have now confirmation of the utter "charade" of the Chas Freeman nomination of Rahm Emanuel thugs within the intelligence power turf battles... Freeman was supposed to be sacrificed from the start of the process, in order to Tame the intelligence community some more....into
complete and utter submittable subservience, obedience , to the Policies of the power behind the power in DC and the Pentagon....

In informal remarks last night at the National Press Club to a media study group founded decades ago by the late White House correspondent Sarah McClendon, Ambassador Chas Freeman, who was forced to withdrawal as Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair's choice to chair the National Intelligence Council (NIC) after a blistering attack against him from Israel's Lobby in Washington, made it clear by his remarks that the Intelligence Community was deprived of a potential supervisor who agreed with an overwhelming majority of intelligence analysts on a number of issues. The NIC oversees some 100,000 analysts in the Intelligence Community and is responsible for writing National Intelligence Estimates (NIE), upon which policies are generally based, and the lesser known National Intelligence Assessments.

The NIC also prepares the all-important President's Daily Brief. Freeman would have tried to cast away past tendencies among U.S. intelligence analysts to engage in "sycophancy" and "group think." He would have also addressed the lack of experience of U.S. intelligence analysts. For example, half of the CIA's analysts have been in their jobs for less than five years. The Bush administration also resulted in a major morale problem among U.S. intelligence analysts, a problem that continues to plague their ranks.

Freeman was opposed to Israel's war against Lebanon in 2006 and its most recent attack on Gaza. Freeman, the U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia during Desert Storm, also opposed the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq, as well as expanding the original policy of eliminating Afghanistan as a base for "Al Qaeda" and its local sponsors into a policy of establishing a strong central government in the country. Freeman also suggested there is a tendency to lump various Afghan and Pashtun tribes in Pakistan into a largely bogus entity called the "Taliban."

Freeman also said he thought it ironic that while he was being accused by Steve Rosen of shilling for foreign governments, Rosen, a former official of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), was under indictment for espionage for Israel.

Freeman regretted that after the end of the Cold War, U.S. foreign policy had been "franchised" to certain interest groups.

There is still no word on who Blair will ultimately choose to replace Freeman as NIC chairman. The position does not require Senate approval but Congress, and especially the AIPAC-controlled members, have made it known that they would prefer some plain vanilla candidate who will continue business as usual. In other words, someone who will not rock the boat.

The UKUSA Alliance and the new found Siamese twins, CIA2/MOSSAD.

The UKUSA Alliance and the new found Siamese twins, CIA2/MOSSAD.

The "Jewish" Conspiracy is British/American Imperialism, and the "court Jews" are utterly subservient to both for decades.

Conspiracy theorists like myself believe modern history reflects a long-
term conspiracy by an international financial elite to enslave humanity.

Like blind men examining an elephant, we attribute this conspiracy to
Jews, Illuminati, Vatican, Jesuits, Freemasons, Black Nobility, and
Bildersbergs etc.

The real villains are at the heart of our economic and cultural life.
They are the dynastic families who own the Bank of England, the US
Federal Reserve and associated cartels. They also control the World Bank
and IMF and most of the world's Intelligence agencies. Their identity is
secret but Rothschild is certainly one of them. The Bank of England was
"nationalized" in 1946 but the power to create money remained in the
same hands.

England is in fact a financial oligarchy run by the "Crown" which refers
to the "City of London" not the Queen. The City of London is run by the
Bank of England, a private corporation. The square-mile-large City is a
sovereign state located in the heart of greater London. As the "Vatican
of the financial world," the City is not subject to British law.

On the contrary, the bankers dictate to the British Parliament. In 1886,
Andrew Carnegie wrote that, "six or seven men can plunge the nation into
war without consulting Parliament at all." Vincent Vickers, a director
of the Bank of England from 1910-1919 blamed the City for the wars of
the world. ("Economic Tribulation" (1940) cited in Knuth, The Empire of
the City, 1943, p 60)

The British Empire was an extension of bankers' financial interests.
Indeed, all the non-white colonies (India, Hong Kong, Gibraltar) were
"Crown Colonies." They belonged to the City and were not subject to
British law although Englishmen were expected to conquer and pay for

The Bank of England assumed control of the U.S. during the T.R.
Roosevelt administration (1901-1909) when its agent J.P. Morgan took
over 25% of American business. (Anton Chaitkin, Treason in America,

According to the "American Almanac," the bankers are part of a network
called the "Club of the Isles" which is an informal association of
predominantly European-based royal households including the Queen. The
Club of the Isles commands an estimated $10 trillion in assets. It lords
over such corporate giants as Royal Dutch Shell, Imperial Chemical
Industries, Lloyds of London, Unilever, Lonrho, Rio Tinto Zinc, and
Anglo American DeBeers. It dominates the world supply of petroleum,
gold, diamonds, and many other vital raw materials; and deploys these
assets at the disposal of its geopolitical agenda.

Its goal: to reduce the human population from its current level of over
5 billion people to below 1 billion people within the next two to three
generations; to literally ``cull the human herd'' in the interest of
retaining their own global power and the feudal system upon which that
power is based.

Historian Jeffrey Steinberg could be referring to the US, Canada and
Australia when he writes, "England, Scotland, Wales, and, especially,
Northern Ireland, are today little more than slave plantations and
social engineering laboratories, serving the needs of ...the City of

These families constitute a financier oligarchy; they are the power
behind the Windsor throne. They view themselves as the heirs to the
Venetian oligarchy, which infiltrated and subverted England from the
period 1509-1715, and established a new, more virulent, Anglo-Dutch-
Swiss strain of the oligarchic system of imperial Babylon, Persia, Rome,
and Byzantium....

The City of London dominates the world's speculative markets. A tightly
interlocking group of corporations, involved in raw materials
extraction, finance, insurance, transportation, and food production,
controls the lion's share of the world market, and exerts virtual
``choke point'' control over world industry."

Steinberg belongs to a group of historians associated with economist
Lyndon Larouche. They have traced this scourge to the migration of the
Venetian mercantile oligarchy to England more than 300 years ago.

Although the Larouche historians do not say so, it appears that many
members of this oligarchy were Jews. Cecil Roth writes: "The trade of
Venice was overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of the Jews, the
wealthiest of the mercantile class." (The History of the Jews in Venice,

As William Guy Carr points out in Pawns in the Game, both Oliver
Cromwell and William of Orange were funded by Jewish bankers. The
English Revolution (1649) was the first in a series of revolutions
designed to give them world hegemony. The establishment of the Bank of
England by William in 1694 was the next crucial step. Behind the facade,
England has been a "Jewish" state for over 300 years. (pp.20-24)

The Jewish banking families made it a practice to marry their female
offspring to spendthrift European aristocrats. In Jewish law, the mixed
offspring of a Jewish mother is Jewish. (The male heirs marry Jews
although the Victor and Jacob Rothschild are exceptions .) For example,
in 1878 Hannah Rothschild married Lord Roseberry. who later became Prime
Minister. In 1922 Louis Mountbatten, the uncle of Prince Philip and
cousin of the Queen married the granddaughter of Jewish banker Ernest
Cassel, one of the wealthiest men in the world. Winston Churchill's
mother, Jenny (Jacobson) Jerome, was Jewish. By the beginning of the
1900s, there were very few English aristocrat families left that hadn't
intermarried with Jews. It was said that, when they visited the
Continent, Europeans were surprised to see Jewish looking persons with
English titles and accents.

According to L.G. Pine, the Editor of Burke's Peerage , Jews "have made
themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two
classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely
linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow against the Jews in this
country would not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also."
(Tales of the British Aristocracy1957, p.219.)

If they aren't Jewish by intermarriage, many European aristocrats
consider themselves descendents of Biblical Hebrews. The Hapsburgs are
related by marriage to the Merovingians who claim to be descendents of
the Tribe of Benjamin.

In addition, many aristocrats belong to the "British Israel" Movement
that believes the British sovereign is the head of the Anglo Saxon "Lost
Tribes" of Israel and that the Apocalypse will see the full
reconstitution of the British Empire.

According to Barbara Aho, Rosicrucians and Freemasons, who believe in
British Israelism, have a plan to place one of their bloodline on the
throne of the rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem. This positioning of a false
messiah whom the world will worship as Christ has been carefully planned
and executed over many centuries.

According to Barry Chamish, "there would be no modern state of Israel
without British Freemasonry. In the 1860s, the British-Israelite
movement was initiated from within Freemasonry. Its goal was to
establish a Jewish-Masonic state in the Turkish province of
Palestine...Initially, British Jewish Masonic families like the
Rothschild's and Montefiores provided the capital to build the
infrastructure for the anticipated wave of immigration. However, luring
the Jews to Israel was proving difficult. They, simply, liked European
life too much to abandon it. So Europe was to be turned into a nightmare
for the Jews."


I wasted much of my life getting a conventional education, so I feel I
am beginning my education anew.

It appears that a vampire-like clique directs the world. This secretive
cabal is represented by our dominant political, economic and cultural
institutions. Western society has been subverted and western culture is
bankrupt. Democracy is a form of social control and the mass media/
education are systems for indoctrination.

Essentially the problem boils down to whether we believe man was made in
God's image and has an obligation to lift himself to a higher level of
truth, beauty and justice. Naturally monopolists have no use for this
and want to define reality to suit their own interests. They have taught
us that God is dead and man is just a fancy animal without a divine
soul. Culture today tends to deny standards, ideals and goals of any
kind. Instead, we are fed an endless diet of trivia and degradation.

Certain elite Jews are an integral part of this elite neo feudal
conspiracy. Throughout history they have had a symbiotic relationship
with the aristocracy. But ordinary Jews like the serfs were manipulated
and persecuted by their elites.

True Judaism like Islam and Christianity affirms the supremacy of God as
a moral force. A real Jew, like a true Christian or Muslim cannot
perform an immoral act. It's time to reaffirm our belief in God."

See also my "Winston Churchill, Illuminati"

See also my "The Riddle of Anti Semitism"

See also my "Is the New World Order Jewish?"

HG Wells' "The world state as extension of British Empire"

A History of Jewish Power in England

See also The Bnai Brith as British Imperialist Asset

See Also "Rothschild Churchill and the Final Solution" by Clifford Shack

Related article: Rixon Steward's Final Countdown "

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

The White House Murder INC, now A sky filled with assassins ...

The White House Murder INC, now A sky filled with assassins ...
Assassins on the ground roaming the world is not enough any more...?

In 1984, Skynet, the supercomputer that rules a future Earth, sent a cyborg assassin, a "terminator”, back to our time. His job was to liquidate the woman who would give birth to John Connor, the leader of the underground human resistance of Skynet's time. You with me so far? That, of course, was the plot of the first Terminator movie and for the multi-millions of people who saw it; the images of future machine war - of hunter-killer drones flying above a wasted landscape - are unforgettable.

Since then, as Hollywood's special effects took off, there were two sequels during which the original terminator somehow morphed into a friendlier figure onscreen, and even more miraculously, off-screen, into the humanoid governor of California. Now, the fourth film in the series, Terminator Salvation, is about to descend on us. It will hit our multiplexes this May.

Oh, sorry, I don't mean hit hit. I mean, arrive in.

Meanwhile, hunter-killer drones haven't waited for Hollywood. As you sit in that movie theater in May, actual unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), pilotless surveillance and assassination drones armed with Hellfire missiles, will be patrolling our expanding global battlefields, hunting down human beings. And in the Pentagon and the labs of defense contractors, UAV supporters are already talking about and working on next-generation machines. Post-2020, according to these dreamers, drones will be able to fly and fight, discern enemies and incinerate them without human decision-making. They're even wondering about just how to program human ethics, maybe even American ethics, into them.

Okay, it may never happen, but it should still make you blink that out there in America are people eager to bring the fifth iteration of Terminator not to local multiplexes but to the skies of our perfectly real world - and that the Pentagon is already funding them to do so.

An arms race of one

Now, keep our present drones, those MQ-1 Predators and more advanced MQ-9 Reapers, in mind for a moment. Remember that, as you read, they're cruising Iraqi, Afghan and Pakistani skies looking for potential "targets", and in Pakistan's tribal borderlands are employing what Centcom commander General David Petraeus calls "the right of last resort" to take out "threats" (as well as tribespeople who just happen to be in the vicinity). And bear with me while I offer you a little potted history of the modern arms race.
Think of it as starting in the early years of the 20th century when Imperial Britain, industrial juggernaut and colonial upstart Germany and Imperial Japan all began to plan and build new generations of massive battleships or dreadnoughts (followed by "super-dreadnoughts") and so joined in a fierce naval arms race. That race took a leap onto land and into the skies in World War I when scientists and war planners began churning out techno-marvels of death and destruction meant to break the stalemate of trench warfare on the Western front.

Each year, starting in 1915, new or improved weaponry - poison gas, upgrades of the airplane, the tank and then the improved tank - appeared on or above the battlefield. Even as those marvels arrived, the next generation of weapons was already on the drawing boards. (In a sense, American auto makers took up the same battle plan in peacetime, unveiling new, ramped up car models each year.) As a result, when World War I ended in 1918, the war machinery of 1919 and 1920 was already being mapped out and developed. The next war, that is, and the weapons that would go with it were already in the mind's eye of war planners.

From the first years of the 20th century on, an obvious prerequisite for what would prove a never-ending arms race was two to four great powers in potential collision, each of which had the ability to mobilize scientists, engineers, universities and manufacturing power on a massive scale. World War II was, in these terms, a bonanza for invention as well as destruction. It ended, of course, with the Manhattan Project, that ne plus ultra of industrial-sized invention for destruction, which produced the first atomic bomb, and so the Cold War nuclear arms race that followed.

In that 45-year brush with extinction, the United States and the Soviet Union each mobilized a military-industrial complex to build ever newer generations of ever more devastating nuclear weaponry and delivery systems for a MAD (mutually assured destruction) world. At the peak of that two-superpower arms race, the resulting arsenals had the mad capacity to destroy eight or ten planets our size.

In 1991, after 73 years, the Soviet Union, that Evil Empire, simply evaporated, leaving but a single superpower without rivals astride planet Earth. And then came the unexpected thing: the arms race, which had been almost a century in the making, did not end. Instead, the unimaginable occurred and it simply morphed into a "race" of one with a finish line so distant - the bomber of 2018, Earth-spanning weapons systems, a vast anti-ballistic missile system and weaponry for the heavens of perhaps 2050 - as to imply eternity.

The Pentagon and the military-industrial complex surrounding it - including mega-arms manufacturers, advanced weapons labs, university science centers, and the official or semi-official think tanks that churned out strategies for future military domination - went right on. After a brief, post-Cold War blip of time in which "peace dividends" were discussed but not implemented, the "race" actually began to amp up again, and after September 11, 2001, went into overdrive against "Islamo-fascism" (aka the "war on terror", or the Long War).

In those years, our Evil Empire of the moment, except in the minds of a clutch of influential neo-cons, was a ragtag terrorist outfit made up of perhaps a few thousand adherents and scattered global wannabes, capable of mounting spectacular-looking but infrequent and surprisingly low-tech attacks on symbolic American (and other) targets. Against this enemy, the Pentagon budget became, for a while, an excuse for anything.

This brings us to our present unbalanced world of military might in which the US accounts for nearly half of all global military spending and the total Pentagon budget is almost six times that of the next contender, China. Recently, the Chinese announced relatively modest plans to build up their military and create a genuinely offshore navy. Similarly, the Russians have moved to downsize and refinance their tattered armed forces and the industrial complex that goes with them, while upgrading their weapons systems. This could potentially make the country more competitive when it comes to global arms dealing, a market more than half of which has been cornered by the US. They are also threatening to upgrade their "strategic nuclear forces", even as Presidents Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama have agreed to push forward a new round of negotiations for nuclear reductions.

Meanwhile, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has just announced cutbacks in some of the more outre and futuristic military R&D programs inherited from the Cold War era. The navy's staggering 11 aircraft-carrier battle groups will over time also be reduced by one. Minor as that may seem, it does signal an imperial downsizing, given that the navy refers to each of those carriers, essentially floating military bases, as "four and a half acres of sovereign US territory". Nonetheless, the Pentagon budget will grow modestly and the US will remain in a futuristic arms race of one, a significant part of which involves reserving the skies as well as the heavens for American power.

Assassination by air

Speaking of controlling those skies, let's get back to UAVs. As futuristic weapons planning went, they started out pretty low-tech in the 1990s. Even today, the most commonplace of the two American armed drones, the Predator, costs only US$4.5 million a pop, while the most advanced model of the Reaper - both are produced by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems of San Diego - comes in at $15 million. (Compare that to $350 million for a single F-22 Raptor, which has proved essentially useless in America's most recent counterinsurgency wars.) It's lucky that UAVs are cheap, since they are also prone to crashing. Think of them as snowmobiles with wings that have received ever more sophisticated optics and powerful weaponry.

They came to life as surveillance tools during the wars over the former Yugoslavia, were armed by February 2001, hastily pressed into operation in Afghanistan after 9/11 and, like many weapons systems, began to evolve generationally. As they did, they developed from surveillance eyes in the sky into something far more sinister and previously restricted to terra firma: assassins. One of the earliest armed acts of a CIA-piloted Predator, back in November 2002, was an assassination mission over Yemen in which a jeep, reputedly transporting six suspected al-Qaeda operatives, was incinerated.

Today, the most advanced UAV, the Reaper, housing up to four Hellfire missiles and two 500-pound bombs, packs the sort of punch once reserved for a jet fighter. Dispatched to the skies over the farthest reaches of the American empire, powered by a 1,000-horsepower turbo prop engine at its rear, the Reaper can fly at up to 7,000 meters for up to 22 hours (until fuel runs short), streaming back live footage from three cameras (or sending it to troops on the ground) - 16,000 hours of video a month.

No need to worry about a pilot dozing off during those 22 hours. The human crews "piloting" the drones, often from thousands of kilometers away, just change shifts when tired. So the planes are left to endlessly cruise Iraqi, Afghan and Pakistani skies relentlessly seeking out, like so many terminators, specific enemies whose identities can, under certain circumstances - or so the claims go - be determined even through the walls of houses. When a "target" is found and agreed on - in Pakistan, the permission of Pakistani officials to fire is no longer considered necessary - and a missile or bomb is unleashed, the cameras are so powerful that "pilots" can watch the facial expressions of those being liquidated on their computer monitors "as the bomb hits".

Approximately 5,500 UAVs, mostly unarmed - less than 250 of them are Predators and Reapers - now operate over Iraq and the Af-Pak (as in the Afghanistan-Pakistan) theater of operations. Part of the more-than-century-long development of war in the air, drones have become favorites of American military planners. Gates in particular has demanded increases in their production (and in the training of their "pilots") and urged that they be rushed in quantity into America's battle zones even before being fully perfected.

And yet, keep in mind that the UAV still remains in its (frightening) infancy. Such machines are not, of course, advanced cyborgs. They are in some ways not even all that advanced. Because someone now wants publicity for the drone-war program, reporters from the US and elsewhere were recently given a "rare behind-the-scenes" look at how they work. As a result, and also because the "covert war" in the skies over Pakistan makes Washington's secret warriors proud enough to regularly leak news of its "successes”, we know something more about how our drone wars work.

We know, for instance, that at least part of the US Air Force's Afghan UAV program runs out of Kandahar air base in southern Afghanistan. It turns out that, pilotless as the planes may be, a pilot does have to be nearby to guide them into the air and handle landings. As soon as the drone is up, a two-man team, a pilot and a "sensor monitor", backed by intelligence experts and meteorologists, takes over the controls either at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona, or at Creech Air Force Base northwest of Las Vegas, thousands of kilometers away. (Other US bases may be involved as well.)
According to Christopher Drew of the New York Times, who visited Davis-Monthan where Air National Guard members handle the controls, the pilots sit unglamorously "at 1990s-style computer banks filled with screens, inside dimly lit trailers". Depending on the needs of the moment, they can find themselves "over" either Afghanistan or Iraq, or even both on the same work shift. All of this is remarkably mundane as pilot complaints generally run to problems "transitioning" back to wife and children after a day at the joystick over battle zones - and at the same time, right out of Ali Baba's One Thousand and One Nights.

In those dimly lit trailers, the UAV teams have taken on an almost godlike power. Their job is to survey a place thousands of kilometers distant (and completely alien to their lives and experiences), assess what they see, and spot "targets" to eliminate - even if on their somewhat antiquated computer systems it "takes up to 17 steps - including entering data into pull-down windows - to fire a missile" and incinerate those below. They only face danger, other than carpal tunnel syndrome, when they leave the job.

A sign at Creech warns a pilot to "drive carefully"; "this, it says, is 'the most dangerous part of your day'." Those involved claim that the fear and thrill of battle do not completely escape them, but the descriptions we now have of their world sound discomfortingly like a cross between the far frontiers of sci-fi and a call center in India.
The most intense of our various drone wars, the one on the other side of the Afghan border in Pakistan, is also the most mysterious. We know that some or all of the drones engaged in it take off from Pakistani airfields; that this "covert war" (which regularly makes front-page news) is run by the CIA out of its headquarters in Langley, Virginia; that its pilots are also located somewhere in the US; and that at least some of them are hired private contractors.

William Saletan of Slate has described our drones as engaged in "a bloodless, all-seeing airborne hunting party". Of course, what was once an elite activity performed in person has been transformed into a 24/7 industrial activity fit for human drones.

Our drone wars also represent a new chapter in the history of assassination. Once upon a time, to be an assassin for a government was a furtive, shameful thing. In those days, of course, an assassin, if successful, took down a single person, not the targeted individual and anyone in the vicinity (or simply, if targeting intelligence proves wrong, anyone in the vicinity). No more poison-dart-tipped umbrellas, as in past KGB operations, or toxic cigars as in CIA ones - not now that assassination has taken to the skies as an every day, all-year-round activity.

Today, we increasingly display our assassination wares with pride. To us, at least, it seems perfectly normal for assassination aerial operations to be a part of an open discussion in Washington and in the media. Consider this a new definition of "progress" in our world.

Proliferation and sovereignty

This brings us back to arms races. They may be things of the past, but don't for a minute imagine that those hunter-killer skies won't someday fill with the drones of other nations. After all, one of the truths of our time is that no weapons system, no matter where first created, can be kept for long as private property. Today, we talk not of arms races, but of "proliferation”, which is what you have once a global arms race of one takes hold.

In drone-world, the Chinese, the Russians, the Israelis, the Pakistanis, the Georgians and the Iranians, among others, already have drones. In the Lebanon War of 2006, Hezbollah flew drones over Israel. In fact, if you have the skills, you can create your own drone, more or less in your living room (as your basic DIY drone website indicates). Undoubtedly, the future holds unnerving possibilities for small groups intent on assassination from the air.

Already the skies are growing more crowded. Three weeks ago, President Obama issued what Reuters termed "an unprecedented videotaped appeal to Iran ... offering a 'new beginning' of diplomatic engagement to turn the page on decades of US policy toward America's longtime foe." It was in the form of a Persian New Year's greeting. As the New York Times also reported, the US military beat the president to the punch. They sent their own "greetings" to the Iranians a couple of days earlier.

After considering what Times reporters Rod Nordland and Alissa J Rubin term "the delicacy of the incident at a time when the United States is seeking a thaw in its relations with Iran”, the US military sent out Colonel James Hutton to meet the press and "confirm" that "allied aircraft" had shot down an "Iranian unmanned aerial vehicle" over Iraq on February 25th, more than three weeks earlier. Between that day and mid-March, the relevant Iraqi military and civilian officials were, the Times tells us, not informed. The reason? That drone was intruding on our (borrowed) airspace, not theirs. You probably didn't know it, but according to an Iraqi Defense Ministry spokesman, "protection of Iraqi airspace remains an American responsibility for the next three years”.

And naturally enough, we don't want other countries' drones in "our" airspace, though that's hardly likely to stop them. The Iranians, for instance, have already announced the development of "a new generation of 'spy drones' that provide real-time surveillance over enemy terrain".

Of course, when you openly control squads of assassination drones patrolling airspace over other countries, you've already made a mockery of whatever national sovereignty might once have meant. It's a precedent that may someday even make us distinctly uncomfortable. But not right now.

If you doubt this, check out the stream of self-congratulatory comments being leaked by Washington officials about our drone assassins. These often lead off news pieces about America's "covert war" over Pakistan ("An intense, six-month campaign of Predator strikes in Pakistan has taken such a toll on al-Qaeda that militants have begun turning violently on one another out of confusion and distrust, US intelligence and counter-terrorism officials say ..."); but be sure to read to the end of such pieces. Somewhere in them, after the successes have been touted and toted up, you get the bad news, "In fact, the stepped-up strikes have coincided with a deterioration in the security situation in Pakistan."

In Pakistan, a war of machine assassins is visibly provoking terror (and terrorism), as well as anger and hatred among people who are by no means fundamentalists. It is part of a larger destabilization of the country.

To those who know their air power history, that shouldn't be so surprising. Air power has had a remarkably stellar record when it comes to causing death and destruction, but a remarkably poor one when it comes to breaking the will of nations, peoples, or even modest-sized organizations. Our drone wars are destructive, but they are unlikely to achieve Washington's goals.

The future awaits us

If you want to read the single most chilling line yet uttered about drone warfare American-style, it comes at the end of Christopher Drew's piece. He quotes Brookings Institution analyst Peter Singer saying of our Predators and Reapers: "[T]hese systems today are very much Model T Fords. These things will only get more advanced."

In other words, our drone wars are being fought with the airborne equivalent of cars with cranks, but the "race" to the horizon is already underway. By next year, some Reapers will have a far more sophisticated sensor system with 12 cameras capable of filming a two-and-a-half mile round area from 12 different angles. That program has been dubbed "Gorgon Stare", but it doesn't compare to the future 92-camera Argus program whose initial development is being funded by the Pentagon's blue-skies outfit, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Soon enough, a single pilot may be capable of handling not one but perhaps three drones, and drone armaments will undoubtedly grow progressively more powerful and "precise”. In the meantime, BAE Systems already has a drone four years into development, the Taranis, which should someday be "completely autonomous"; that is, it theoretically will operate without human pilots. Initial trials of a prototype are scheduled for 2010.

By 2020, so claim UAV enthusiasts, drones could be engaging in aerial battle and choosing their victims themselves. As Robert S Boyd of McClatchy reported recently, "The Defense Department is financing studies of autonomous, or self-governing, armed robots that could find and destroy targets on their own. On-board computer programs, not flesh-and-blood people, would decide whether to fire their weapons."

It's a particular sadness of our world that, in Washington, only the military can dream about the future in this way, and then fund the "arms race" of 2018 or 2035. Rest assured that no one with a governmental red cent is researching the healthcare system of 2018 or 2035, or the public education system of those years.

In the meantime, the skies of our world are filling with round-the-clock assassins. They will only evolve and proliferate. Of course, when we check ourselves out in the movies, we like to identify with John Connor, the human resister, the good guy of this planet, against the evil machines. Elsewhere, however, as we fight our drone wars ever more openly, as we field mechanical techno-terminators with all-seeing eyes and fire our missiles from thousands of miles away ("Hasta la Vista, Baby!"), we undoubtedly look like something other than a nation of John Connors to those living under the Predators. It may not matter if the joysticks and consoles on those advanced machines are somewhat antiquated; to others, we are now the terminators of the planet, implacable machine assassins.

True, we can't send our drones into the past to wipe out the young Ayman al-Zawahiri in Cairo or the teenage Osama bin Laden speeding down some Saudi road in his gray Mercedes sedan. True, the UAV enthusiasts, who are already imagining all-drone wars run by "ethical" machines, may never see anything like their fantasies come to pass. Still, the fact that without the help of a single advanced cyborg we are already in the process of creating a Terminator planet should give us pause for thought ... or not.

Monday, April 06, 2009

"Red herring" of "Red China" in Bennett murder case

"Red herring" of "Red China" in Bennett murder case

On April 3, WMR reported, "When NBC-4 in Washington, DC was fed a story from an 'intelligence source' that CIA officer William Bennett's brutal bludgeoning murder on March 22 may have been linked to his work for the CIA that resulted in the U.S. bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, the station was being misled with a red herring. WMR's Chinese sources report that the U.S. bombing of the Chinese embassy on May 7, 1999, was no mistake and it was targeted as a result of a decision by then-director of the National Security Agency (NSA) General Michael Hayden to target the facility because its communications center was sending burst transmissions to Yugoslav army units in Kosovo from the Yugoslav military high command in Belgrade."

It appears that certain quarters are intent on trying to pin Bennett's murder on the Chinese in an act of retribution, even though such a move would be all but unthinkable a few weeks before President Barack Obama's first meeting with Chinese Presient Hu Jintao at the G20 Summit in London.

"The Cable," which is operated by the always-dubious neocon-owned and operated Washington Post is also running a piece suggesting Bennett was murdered in a Chinese retaliatory attack. The article states "In 1999, sources bring to our attention, Bennett was a retired Army lieutenant colonel working at the CIA on contract as a targeter during the 78-day NATO air war on Kosovo. He was one of the people, according to a former U.S. intelligence source, who was later found responsible by the Agency for feeding the target into the system that resulted in the May 7, 1999 NATO bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade . . . The former U.S. intelligence source says Bennett was fired as a consequence of the CIA investigation into how the Chinese embassy was targeted." The Cable also reported its source told them that Bennett was the only CIA officer fired as a result of the Chinese embassy bombing while sanctioning six others."

WMR's own intelligence sources report on the NSA and CIA mission that targeted the Chinese embassy not by mistake but on purpose.

On April 3, WMR's report stated: "The embassy was also transmitting television signals that were being used as part of a passive detection system used to track U.S. Air Force stealth aircraft over Yugoslavia. On March 27, 1999, the Yugoslav army, with the assistance of the Chinese long wavelength detection system, was able to spot a stealth F-117 and shoot it down. The Pentagon gave China an ultimatum to return the F-117's cloaking system that was recovered by Yugoslavian military units from the wreckage and turned it over to the Chinese. The Chinese Foreign Ministry, like the Clinton White House, was reportedly kept out of the loop on the serious military confrontation between the Pentagon and the Chinese People's Liberation Army and intelligence services. There was a leak to the media by a CIA officer or officers out of the NATO base in Vicenza, Italy concerning the targeting of the Chinese embassy and it just so happens that Bennett was stationed at the base during the Yugoslav campaign."

WMR can report the following further details on the attack on the Chinese embassy: The Chinese radar system that was used by the Serbs to bring down the F-117 used a form of passive pulse Doppler radar that operates in the long wave television broadcast band from 50 to 88 MHz on television channels 2 through 6. It used the synchronous pulses generated by a high power television transmitter for its timing source, usually synchronized by a global positioning system (GPS). The mobile radar station is merely a receiver and a directional antenna in receive-only mode. The signals are fed into a laptop computer with a GPS receiver for timing purposes. All stealth aircraft (F-117/F-22) with a wing span between 25 and 75 feet will self resonate and "light up" when exposed to high power radar signals in the TV band.

According to our intelligence sources, the system was used in Yugoslavia by the Chinese to demonstrate there anti-stealth technology to the United States. Algeria's radio-electronic combat troops were also testing the anti-stealth radar system in 1997 on behalf of the Russians.

A U.S. intelligence source who examined the Russian radar system while being tested in Algeria discovered the original software documents used by the anti-stealth system were written in Hebrew and were provided by the Israelis to the Russians. The Russians were using their partially Israeli-developed anti-stealth radar system to track the high altitude stealth Aurora testing that was going on in the skies above North Africa at the time.

The Israelis developed a highly-advanced and portable version of the radar that they sold to both the Russians and the Chinese. In addition, this system is part of the advance early warning radar system used by the Russian S-300 missile system, which Russia has agreed to provide to Iran. The system, according to U.S. intelligence sources, uses software copied from the Patriot missile system sold by the United States to Israel.

On April 7, 1992, the Toronto Star reported that Chinese military attaches in the Netherlands and Syria told American diplomats that Israel passed classified Patriot technology to China. The Chinese disclosures confirmed earlier CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reports that Israel had passed on Patriot technology to China following the deployment of Patriot missile batteries to Israel during Operation Desert Storm.

Israelis operated two Patriot batteries at military installations along its coast -- one north of Tel Aviv and the other south of Haifa.

ABC News reported in 1992 that the Israelis tried to claim that it was the Saudis who passed Patriot missile secrets to China. It was Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney rejected the Israeli allegation about the Saudis, stating to ABC News that "I don't believe it has any credibility. All the Patriots that are in Saudi Arabia are manned by Americans. There are no Patriots manned by Saudis."

The George H. W. Bush administration dispatched a team of Defense and State Department and CIA inspectors to Israel on March 19, 1992, to check out the Israeli passing of Patriot secrets to China. The Israeli government condemned the move as an act of an "untrusting ally." The National Security Agency (NSA) and its Hebrew linguists conducted a full-scale signals intelligence operation targeting Israeli communications with Chinese parties. U.S. spy satellites ordered over the the Patriot missile battery areas provided detailed imagery that allowed analysts to check on suspicious activity and movement of vehicles prior to the arrival of the U.S. inspection team.

In 1997, the FBI raided the Southville, Michigan home of U.S. Army Tank, Automotive and Armaments Command (TAACOM) engineer David Tannenbaum. FBI agents confiscated documents, phone call records, and computer disks that reportedly included classified documents on the Patriot missile system. CNN reported that Tannenbaum, in an affidavit, said he "inadvertently provided" the information to Israel. The FBI suspected that Tannenbaum provided classified information to Israeli liaison officers over a ten year period. The FBI later dropped its investigation of Tannenbaum. The government of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu quickly denied any knowledge of the affair.

In 2008, Ben-Ami Kadish, a retired engineer for the U.S. Army's Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center at the Picatinny Arsenal in New Jersey, was charged with passing Patriot missile technology, in addition to other military secrets, to Israel during his long stint as a spy for Mossad handlers in New York and Washington. It is believed by FBI investigators that computer components from the Patriot system were passed by Kadish to his Mossad handlers and that this technology was then passed to China.

One of Mossad's top foreign liaison officers was Uzi Arad, who not only spied abroad but collected sensitive military technology for the Israelis, including Patriot missile technology. He was one of the handlers involved in the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) espionage ring of Larry Franklin, Steve Rosen, and Keith Weissman. Arad is now the National Security Council chairman for the Israeli government but is denied a U.S. visa because of his past espionage activities in the United States.

WMR has been informed that a classified report on Israel's transfer of Patriot and other sensitive military technology to Russia and China, including that which was used against U.S. stealth aircraft during the Kosovo war, exists within the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

Since the S-300 is a Russian clone of the Patriot missile system, the Israelis are apoplectic over the notion that Iran could deploy it. The system's passive radar cannot be detected and destroyed by normal anti-radiation systems such as Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) or Wild Weasel Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) systems. . The anti-stealth S-300 technology is said to be so good that it forced the retirement of the SR-71 Blackbird from the U.S. stealth air reconnaissance fleet. Apparently, the U.S. Air Force hopes to retire the F-117 for the same reason. The F-22 Raptor has also been rendered useless because of widespread deployment of the anti-stealth radar system by the Russians and Chinese. The system is currently being tested in Syria and North Korea and has been sold to India.

Our sources claim the Israelis are simply engaged in covering up there illegal technology transfers and Bennett's knowledge of the Israeli operation earned him a death sentence, likely carried out by a Russian-Israeli "Kosher Nostra" mob cell from Florida. The perpetrators of Bennett's murder are not to be found in the Far East but the Middle East....

- Bush and Obama Administrations Both Broke Law By Refusing to Close Insolvent Banks

- Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

- Magic Thermite and the 9/11 Fairytale: You might want to also ask yourself if five dancing Afghanis; five dancing Iraqis or five dancing Iranians were discovered in the area of New York City on 9/11.

- The planned destruction of international law

- Procuring Academics for Empire: The Pentagon Minerva Research Initiative -

Sunday, April 05, 2009

Israel's MOSSAD, CIA and 9/11, the game is over....

Israel's MOSSAD, CIA and 9/11, the game is over....
911 Made by israel

Evidence of Thermite and active Thermite found in the WTC (microscropic electronic picture).

Proof of the Conspiracy: The Evidence of Thermite on 9-11
Christopher Bollyn,

April 4, 2009

This evidence is conclusive that Thermite was used to destroy the World Trade Center. This is the crucial evidence of demolition with Thermite. This is why Dr. Jones and Christopher Bollyn were attacked in August-September 2006 and removed from their positions. The game is over. This is the scientific proof that the towers were brought down with Thermite. The Truth will prevail.
Full evidence detailed in the latest article :

Is Henry Kissinger Setting Obama's Foreign Policy?

Most wanted war criminals on earth : Peres and Kissinger

Is Henry Kissinger Setting Obama's Foreign Policy?

Americans who voted for the change promised by Barack Obama would probably have been disturbed to see Henry Kissinger, an 85-year-old "warhorse" from the Nixon administration and the Vietnam War era meeting with the leaders of Russia during an "informal" summit on March 19-20. Kissinger's recent meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was actually his third meeting, at least, since Medvedev was elected and his second since Obama was elected. So who's running U.S. foreign policy?

One might ask, "This is change?" Isn't Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in charge of U.S. foreign policy? What position does Henry Kissinger have in the Obama administration and why is he meeting with the Russian leadership before Clinton and Obama? Who does Henry Kissinger serve and why is he crafting U.S. foreign policy?

The best answer to these questions came directly from Obama's National Security Adviser, Jim Jones, when he spoke in Munich's Hotel Bayerischer Hof on February 8, 2009:

Thank you for that wonderful tribute to Henry Kissinger yesterday. Congratulations. As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today.

Jim Jones, Obama's National Security Adviser, admitted that he takes his daily orders from Dr. Henry Kissinger. He was not joking. His speech can be read on the White House website.

This is how the Chicago Tribune and its sister paper the Los Angeles Times explained Kissinger's recent visit to Moscow:

To "reset" relations with Russia, an old diplomatic warhorse is back on the path. Henry Kissinger, the architect of Cold War detente with the Soviet Union, met informally with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to try to smooth over a new generation of animosities between the countries.


The octogenarian Republican is an improbable emissary to push the diplomatic line of a young Democratic president. But here he was in Moscow on Friday [March 20]: Henry Kissinger, the architect of Cold War detente with the Soviet Union, meeting informally with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to try to smooth over a new generation of animosities between the two countries.

Interfax, the Russian news service, reported that the purpose of Kissinger's visit was to help organize a meeting between Obama and Medvedev and arrange Obama's visit to Moscow. The White House denied that Kissinger had been sent by President Barack Obama. "They're private citizens and not there at the behest of the White House," said an administration official, discussing the contacts on condition of anonymity. "But they did inform the White House beforehand."

Wait a minute. If the White House did not send Kissinger, but Kissinger is organizing a meeting between Presidents Obama and Medvedev, who is really running the White House and why is Kissinger discussing U.S. foreign policy with the leaders of Russia? This visit by Kissinger to Moscow is the clearest signal to that the Obama White House is controlled by Kissinger and his fellow Elders of Zion. Why else has the news of this visit been suppressed in the mainstream media.

Obama, it should be remembered, refused to comment on Israel's criminal assault on Gaza in January because he did not think it was proper, as president-elect, to voice his opinion while George W. Bush was still president. Obama said that he would "have plenty to say" about Gaza after January 20, yet he has not said anything meaningful about the situation and kept his envoy from even visiting the devastated Gaza Strip. Well, Mr. Obama, how proper is it for Henry Kissinger to speak for the United States government to the Russian leaders?

Kissinger, it should be noted, is very close to Maurice "Hank" Greenberg the former head of A.I.G./CIA, the corrupt insurance company which has funneled a large part of the incredible amount of $180 billion received from the U.S. government to private banks such as Goldman Sachs. Kissinger became chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in 1987. Greenberg's name, like Kissinger's, is kept out of the media discussion of A.I.G./CIA, which is like talking about the development of Ford Motor Company without mentioning Henry Ford. Why is Kissinger's role in crafting U.S. policy and in the criminally corrupt A.I.G./CIA not discussed in the U.S. media as he discusses U.S. foreign policy with Russia's leaders?

Avec la complicité occidentale, la Syrie compte échapper au Tribunal international pour le Liban

Avec la complicité occidentale, la Syrie compte échapper au Tribunal international pour le Liban

Des officiers supérieurs syriens, ayant exécuté Hariri, auraient disparu à Damas

Une course est engagée entre le Tribunal international spécial pour le Liban, installé le 1er mars aux Pays-Bas pour juger les commanditaires et les exécutants de Rafic Hariri et responsables de plusieurs crimes terroristes au Liban, et le régime syrien qui cherche à échapper à la justice et à prolonger son immunité. Trois officiers syriens qui ont régné sur le Liban pendant l’occupation ont d’ores et déjà disparu.

Pour négocier son immunité, le régime syrien s’est littéralement couché devant les Américains après avoir berné les Européens. Il fait miroiter sa disponibilité à négocier avec Israël, tout en rappelant ses capacités de nuisance à Gaza. Il propose d’ouvrir ses frontières et son territoire aux Américains pour faciliter leur retrait d’Irak. Il propose de coopérer dans la lutte contre le terrorisme, tout en finançant et armant les terroristes de tous bords : les sunnites d’Al-Qaïda en Irak, les Chiites du Hezbollah au Liban, les laïcs des organisations palestiniennes... La Syrie tente aussi de réhabiliter le Hezbollah libanais en Occident. Londres vient d’accorder un visa à l’un des dirigeants du parti de Dieu, afin de négocier un échange de prisonniers en Irak. Le Hezbollah réclame la libération de l’un des chefs militaires détenu par les Britanniques (il entraînait les milices chiites à Bassorah), et propose sa médiation pour libérer un ressortissant anglais enlevé en Mésopotamie depuis plusieurs années...

Parallèlement, Bachar Al-Assad défend le président soudanais Omar Al-Bachir face à la Cour Pénale Internationale, pour se protéger lui-même de la justice. Il réclame en revanche le jugement des responsables israéliens et américains qui ont commis les crimes à Gaza et en Irak...

Par ces manœuvres complexes, que certains comparent à la « prostitution étatique », Damas cherche à gonfler artificiellement le torse et à montrer ses dents pour mieux négocier l’immunité de son régime. La Syrie sait que les Américains sont à deux doigts de capituler en Afghanistan, qu’ils appellent Téhéran au secours et que la nouvelle administration a déjà décrété la fin de la guerre contre le terrorisme dans sa forme actuelle. Les Syriens se félicitent également d’avoir vaincu les Européens, non pas grâce à leur propre puissance, mais juste en exploitant la lâcheté de ces derniers, leur désunion et leur masochisme...

Dans ce contexte qui lui est favorable, le régime syrien examine le meilleur scénario qui lui permettra d’échapper à la justice, en éliminant les témoins encombrants. Une promesse aurait été donnée par les Européens (des responsables onusiens et des conseillers de Nicolas Sarkozy, selon « ») selon laquelle ni le Président Assad ni ses proches (son frère Maher et son beau-frère Assef Chawkate) ne seront convoqués par le TPI dans le procès Hariri. Par contre, le TPI se contentera de convoquer les témoins de second rang. Or, « » affirme ce 1er avril (pas un poisson d’avril) que trois officiers ayant servi au Liban pendant l’occupation, et qui sont cités à comparaitre devant le TPI, ont récemment disparu en Syrie. Il s’agit du « véritable gouverneur syrien du Liban » Rustom Ghazalé, de son adjoint Jameh Jameh, et d’un officier des renseignements en poste à Beyrouth en 2005, le colonel Jamal Abou Jamal. Leur disparition est intervenue quelques jours seulement avant que le TPI ne réclame du Liban la remise de tous les dossiers relatifs à l’enquête sur l’assassinat de Hariri.

Les trois officiers syriens seraient, selon les mêmes sources, emprisonnés par le régime. Assad redoute en effet leur fuite à l’étranger. Sous la pression et se sentant sacrifiés, les officiers risquent de livrer tous leurs secrets, impliquant Assad et son entourage dans le terrorisme d’Etat au Liban. Aussi, en cas de convocation, Assad pourra les juger et les exécuter en Syrie, pour effacer toute trace de sa culpabilité. Enfin, le président syrien pourra simplement refuser de les livrer, prétextant leur disparition.

Synthèse de Khaled Asmar, d’après « »

(Pour des raisons encore indéterminées, « » a retiré son article peu de temps après sa publication. Mais l’ayant imprimé, nous le mettons à disposition en format PDF)