Sunday, July 24, 2011

Nato's Gladio false flag attack in Oslo, Norway...a prelude for total regionalization of the European continent....

Debris is seen on the street after the explosion in central Oslo, 22 July

NATO's total control over the Zionist Christians extreme right wing all over Europe and Beyond is a political tool for Israel. From Dutch Zionist Christian Geert Wilders, to the crusaders of the EDL in the UK, and the financial Zionist terrorists of the German UDC in Switzerland, Mossadniks in control of French racist pro-Israeli government....etc etc. Israel has a full range of control over the EU para-military groups, NATO, secret services, political racist parties and will use these tools to provoke a 'clash of civilization'. The operation in Oslo is an Israeli-NATO clandestine networks job and these false flag attacks are going to be used all over Europe to dismantle all the current nation-states and impose regionalization of the continent under massive governmental cuts and civil wars engineered from Belfast to Athens, Paris, Lyon, Lille, Nice, Strasbourg, Roma, Barcelona, Marseille, Copenhagen, Berlin, Warsaw.... The plan is to create an Euramerica-Reich, under the Zionist domination of the dual citizens (European-Israelis....)

NATO's far right Zionist Christian groups are the primary suspects, most of them made allegiance to Israel as the next ruling state in the world through the most vicious and racist corporation known as the freemasonry. In this photo, one of the killers, Anders Behring, is wearing his Masonic suit....

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/25/norways-911/comment-page-1/#comment-252281

Shimon Peres to the Israeli newspapers, the 15th May 2011: 'Norway is the most anti-Semitic country in the West'.

Youth-camp Terrorist May Have Pro-Israel Motive

Norway horror: 80 die in camp shooting, 7 in blast
OSLO, Norway (AP) — A Norwegian who dressed as a police officer to gun down summer campers killed at least 80 people at an island retreat, horrified police said early Saturday.
...
The motive was unknown, but both attacks were in areas connected to the ruling Labor Party government. The youth camp, about 20 miles (35 kilometers) northwest of Oslo, is organized by the party's youth wing, and the prime minister had been scheduled to speak there Saturday.
The terrorist was a right wing Christian. Norwegian TV via automated translation:
According to TV2's sources, the arrested belong to the right-extremist groups in eastern Norway, and the man must have registered two weapons on their name - an automatic weapon and a pistol of the type of Glock. ... Breivik listed in their Facebook profile as a conservative and Christian, and he may have a connection to the extreme right environment.
The rightwing Norwegian Progress Party and its surrounding allotment of rightwing groups are historic fascistic, pro-apartheid and today very much in support of a Likudnik's Israel.
Via Newshoggers a report from a Norwegian TV site on the activities in the Labour Party youth camp may explain the killer's motive.
Automated translation:
Headline:
Jonas Gahr Store: - The occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now
Header:
The Foreign Minister was met with claims that Norway must recognize a Palestinian state when he visited the Labour Youth League summer camp Thursday.
Picturetext:
AUF WANT BOYCOTT: Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store was met by demands that Norway must recognize a Palestinian state when he visited the Labour Youth League summer camp at Utøya Thursday. Here the Minister ushered around in the camp of the AUF leader Eskil Pedersen. (Reuters)
Text:
During the second day of Labour Youth League summer camp at Utøya got the Labour Party's young hopefuls visit by Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store. Together with the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation correspondent Sidsel Wold and Norwegian People's Aid Kirsten Belck-Olsen, discussed the Foreign Minister of the deadlock between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
As foreign minister arrived Utøya he was met with a demand from the AUF that Norway must recognize a Palestinian state.
- The Palestinians must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now, said the Foreign Minister to cheers from the audience.
- Norway is prepared to recognize
Earlier this week, when Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas visited Norway, the Minister said to TV 2 news channel that Norway stands ready to recognize a Palestinian state . This he repeated during the debate on Utøya.
- We are ready to recognize a Palestinian state. I await the actual resolution text Palestinians will promote the UN General Assembly in September, said the Minister.
In autumn it is expected that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will bring the matter to the UN. Where will he ask for UN membership and recognition of a Palestinian state within the borders before the 1967 war, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
Wednesday said AUF leader Eskil Pedersen that the AUF want a unilateral economic embargo of Israel from the Norwegian side.
- Labour Youth will have a more activist Middle East policy and we have to recognize Palestine. NOK NOK's, now we have to get the peace process into a new track, said Pedersen.
The foreign minister admitted that the situation is untenable, but believes that the boycott is the wrong tool.
- Boycott will be to move from dialogue to monologue. It is difficult to open the door the day we will talk with Israel, said the Minister.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2011/07/youthcamp-killer-may-have-anti-palestine-motive.html

Norway was ready to recognize the state of Palestine at the United Nations in September.... but gets severely bombed in an 'Israeli fashion'. Norway successfully integrated HAMAS in the negotiation of the '1967 borders', a plan that was putting Israel as the only real responsible for the failure of the peace in the Middle East. Bombing Norway means Israel is preparing for a total war to avoid recognition of the Palestinian state in September 2011at any cost....

Multiple Terrorist Bombings In Olso, Norway — Signature Of Mossad False Flag NATO Terror Attacks

Reports of multiple bombings in Olso, Norway have the signature of an 'Al-CIAda' false-flag operation conducted by the Israeli Mossad.

'Norway is the most anti-Semitic country in the West', said Shimon Peres the 15 May 2011. Mr. Shimon Peres critical comments on Norway's reluctancy to follow EU, UN and USA in denouncing Hamas as a terrorist movement, are timely remarks. Following Norway's diplomacy efforts to integrate HAMAS in the 'peace process'.

The man arrested is part of the NATO clandestine terror groups, similar to the Gladio Network..., set up all over Europe to execute false flag operations and turn the Europeans against Islam and support USA/Israel's wars. NATO is responsible for this attack, if nobody takes care of the Israelis running NATO, Europe will be the target of the largest massacres since the WW2...

Norway news agencies are reporting that two government buildings have just been bombed in Norway. There are no reports from English agencies at this time. English videos and reports will be added at bottom of this article when they become available.'

Unreal. An entire block has exploded.Huge explosion rocks Oslo  Norway
Unreal -- An entire block has exploded -- Huge explosion rocks Oslo, Norway




Video Report From On The Ground At Site Of Oslo, Norway Terrorist Attack


A Google translation of an Aftenposten article reads:

Large explosion in central Oslo

There has been a major explosion in downtown Oslo. Windows are broken in VG-built and government officials in Oslo.

Read also:
The case updated
It is not yet possible to say how many people are injured or killed in the explosion. But police now acknowledge that there are fatalities.
NTB reported that two confirmed fatalities.
Police have not yet complete overview of the number of casualties.

- Oil and Energy was the goal....

According to Dagbladet, police said the attack targeted the Oil and Energy Affairs, MOE.
The greatest damage is the R4 building in ministries, the police said.
This is supported by information from the Communications Minister, Earl Smith-Isaksen.
- The premises of the OED is battered. It looks like it was right outside our offices, says Smith-Isaksen to Aftenposten.no.

Treats people on the street

The building that houses, among other things, the Prime Minister’s office is also affected by the explosion.
Aftenposten.no have informed the Prime Minister’s Office (SMK), Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg is the safety and undamaged.
- I can not say for certain, everything is chaotic, says Sindre Fossum Beyer at SMK.
Paramedics treat more injured in the street outside the government building.
Many people are bleeding in the street outside, hit by broken glass that fell from the broken windows.
- You can not go through here, because there are still two bombs we do not know where is, police on site to Aftenposten.no reporters.
Aftenposten.no has so far failed to confirm whether it still bombs that have not been located.

Trying to get an overview....

Several facilities in nearby have been evacuated, including NTB premises.
- All we know is that there is a kind of explosion. We are on the way out there, are the short and hasty message Aftenposten.no get the police in Oslo for the call just after half past four.
In a press release from the Oslo police are the following:
Large parts of the city center is evacuated, and police urge the public not to stay in Oslo.
Police also ask that pulbikum limits the use of mobile phones.

Several injured....

Both windows in the government quarter and VG building is blown out, according to Aftenposten’s report on the site.
- The police tell us that we need to get us off, we need to get off. There may be more bombs, tells reporters.
They say that there is broken glass everywhere, the burning of buildings.
- I see people with blood on his face and hands, telling Aftenposten reporter.
Eyewitnesses said, according to NTB, it may look like a car outside a high block has been the basis for the explosion.

Entire facades blown out.....

Our reporter passed Market Street and there is full chaos people running around bewildered. Several places are a fire alarm.
You can smell the sulfur fumes.
Shop Denim Gallery has received throughout the facade blown out.

Rods of increasing areas

A huge røyksy rose several hundred feet in the air. Large parts of Oslo heard a huge explosion which led to Darren Hayes, the Aftenposten keeps house literally shook when the explosion took place at five at half four in the afternoon.
Press The wave was so powerful that the windows all the way down to the National Agencies building was blown out.
Vaterland tunnel is closed.
The area between Stortorvet, Hammersborg and Storgata is blocked off. Young town square is already closed, because the police fear that new explosions can occur.
There have been several unconfirmed reports that it also should have been a violent explosion in Parliament Street, just below the Parliament, according to NTB.
It is still unclear what caused the explosion.
The report of the first bombing was followed by reports of a two more bombs, as reported in this Google Translation.

There may be more bombs

The police on site tell Dagbladet.

(Dagbladet): A little before 15.30 in the afternoon, large parts of the city center hit by a huge explosion in the government quarter .
About a half hour later told NRK that the capital was hit by another explosion, this time in Parliament Street. This message disprove NRK now on their website.
Police at the site told Dagbladet that they fear the new bombs.
- There may be more bombs, police said.
According to Aftenposten.no there are still two bombs the police do not know where is.
- You can not go through here, because there are still two bombs we do not know where is, according to police Aftenposten.no .
The scope of the first explosion is still unclear, but many are injured. Much of the area Youngstorget was hit and routes are broken into several apartment buildings and construction.
- There are a lot of injured people in the area, many seriously injured.There is injured inside the area with excessive bleeding.All the buildings are destroyed, it is absolutely awful, says Jan Larsen told newspaper Dagbladet.
If there are indeed multiple bombs it is clearly the calling card of an Al-Qaeda terrorist attack which are executed with precision in multiple locations.
The problem is there is absolutely no motive for Al-Qaeda to launch an attack against Norway since Norway supports the formation of a Palestinian state, which is against the wishes of Israel and in support of Muslim activists world-wide.

Norway to support Palestinians – Norwegian FM



Norway will support Palestinians who are set to press for recognition of the independence of their state by the United Nations, says the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre.
He was speaking following his talks in Oslo with the Palestinian National Administration Head Mahmoud Abbas.
Støre said he saw a likely recognition of Palestine’s independence by the United Nations as no hindrance to a peaceful settlement in the Middle East. He said the Palestinian-Israeli talks should continue irrespectively of the UN voting results.
Source: The Voice of Russia
If this in fact an Al-Qaeda attack a blaring question remains. Why would Al-Qaeda attack a nation whose goals are aligned with the goals of the Al-Qaeda movement?
The simple answer would be this is a false flag terror attack and the likely suspect for carrying out the operation would be the Israeli Mossad as an act of revenge for supporting Palestine.


Update 11:25 AM
BBC Reports:

Oslo: Bomb blast near Norway prime minister’s office

Eye-witness: “Police are beginning to seal off streets where there is a danger of falling glass”

Related Stories





A large bomb blast has hit near government headquarters in the Norwegian capital Oslo, killing at least one person.
The offices of Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg were damaged extensively – a government spokeswoman said he was safe.
Police said a number of people were injured in the city centre explosion.
No-one has said they were behind the attack, which witnesses said could be heard across the capital.
Television footage from the scene showed rubble and glass from shattered windows in the streets – smoke was rising from some buildings. The wreckage of at least one car was on one street.
All roads into the city centre have been closed, said national broadcaster NRK, and security officials evacuated people from the area, fearing another blast.
“Police can confirm there were deaths and injuries following the explosion in the government quarter this afternoon,” police said in a statement.
Oistein Mjarum, head of communications for the Norwegian Red Cross, said his offices were close to the site of the explosion.
“There was a massive explosion which could be heard over the capital Oslo,” he told the BBC.
Government spokeswoman Camilla Ryste told the Associated Press Mr Stoltenberg was safe. Initial reports said he was not hurt.
A spokesman for Oslo University hospital said seven people had been taken there for treatment.
“I don’t know how seriously wounded they are,” he told Reuters.
‘Complete chaos’
Mr Mjarum said there were fires burning in the prime minister’s 17-storey building.
“This is a very busy area on Friday afternoon and there was a lot of people in the streets, and many people working in these buildings that are now burning,” he said.
Eyewitness Ole Tommy Pedersen said he was standing at a bus stop about 100m away from the blast.
“I saw three or four injured people being carried out of the building a few minutes later,” Mr Pedersen told AP.
He said there was a cloud of smoke billowing from the lower floors.
An NRK journalist, Ingunn Andersen, said the headquarters of tabloid newspaper VG had also been damaged.
“I see that some windows of the VG building and the government headquarters have been broken. Some people covered with blood are lying in the street,” AP quoted her as saying.
“It’s complete chaos here. The windows are blown out in all the buildings close by.”
Mr Mjarum said people were in shock in Oslo and across Norway.
“We have never had a terrorist attack like this in Norway – if that’s what it is – but of course this has been a great fear for all Norwegians when they have seen what has been happening around the world.”
Source: BBC
Aftermath of explosion in central Oslo, Norway - 22 July 2011
Aftermath of explosion in central Oslo, Norway - 22 July 2011
Smoke billows over Oslo, 22 July
Smoke billows over Oslo, 22 July
Debris is seen on the street after the explosion in central Oslo, 22 July
Debris is seen on the street after the explosion in central Oslo, 22 July
Rescuers tend to an injured person after the blast in Oslo, 22 July
Rescuers tend to an injured person after the blast in Oslo, 22 July
Shattered windows in a multi-storey building after the blast in Oslo, 22 July
Shattered windows in a multi-story building after the blast in Oslo, 22 July

CNN Updates on the Terrorist bombings.

Security expert: Olso Norway Attacked Because it’s seen as a ‘soft target’

CNN|Added on July 22, 2011
Security expert Will Geddes says Norway could be a terror target because it’s seen as a “soft target.”

Related Posts

High-Level American Officials Admit that the United States Uses False Flag Terror … And Warn of Future Attacks

High-Level American Officials Admit that the United States Uses False Flag Terror ... And Warn of Future Attacks Preface: U.S. President James Madison said: "If Tyranny and Oppression come to this ...

READ MORE

Governments Now Using Facebook To Spy On Activists

News reports confirm that governments are now being aided by Facebook to spy on activists who plan peaceful protests. One report reveals that over 300 activists were tracked, detained and ...
READ MORE


http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/07/22/breaking-multiple-bombings-olso-norway-signature-alqueda-false-flag-39691/


....

Shove your condolences Shimon Peres

Shimon Peres on Jul 24 -- REUTERS President Shimon Peres on Sunday called Norwegian King Harald V to express his condolences over Friday's shooting spree and bomb attack that left 98 people dead in Norway. "Your country is a symbol of peace and freedom," Peres told the king according to an official statement. "In Israel we followed the events over the weekend in Norway and the attack on innocent civilians broke our hearts. It is a painful tragedy that touches every human being."

The same Shimon Peres was reported to have said on May 15: "Norway is the most anti-Semitic country in the West." Peres was reacting to Norway's pro-Palestinian foreign and Israel boycott and divestment policies.

At the same time, the Norwegian Embassy in Washington received a letter from a group of U.S. Jews urging a boycott of Norwegian salmon and Voss water.

The Anders Behring Breivik cells in Norway made common cause with the right-wing global Zionist agenda of Islamophobia, racism, anti-Palestinian sovereignty, and opposition to socialist and leftist political parties. And the terrorist attacks in Norway most definitely had the signature of past Mossad outrages.

The nations of the Nordic Union should, together, impose a unified boycott on Israel in response to the Israeli intelligence service's blatant act of aggression on peace-loving Norway.

Post-script: Iceland was recently accused of anti-Semitism by Israel, in the same manner Norway received similar accusations from Israeli officials prior to Breivik's terrorist actions. Now, from Hull, England, a report that a heavy Icelandic statue honoring British sailors was stolen by a team of five men.






Saturday, July 23, 2011

Crooked Mass Media Worldwide are Presstitutes for the elite power behind the power....



CIA/MOSSAD/MI6 controlled Crooked Mass Media Worldwide, are Presstitutes for the elite power behind the power....on a Global scale.

While the Rupert Murdoch scandal is justifiably front-page news, there is a much wider problem with the mainstream media.

Purchasing Reporters

Famed Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein says
the CIA has already bought and paid for many successful journalists.

A CIA operative allegedly
told Washington Post editor Philip Graham ... in a conversation about the willingness of journalists to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories:
You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month.
The Church Committee found that the CIA submitted stories to the American press:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8_FckHV3T8&feature=player_embedded

The New York Times discusses in a matter-of-fact way the use of mainstream writers by the CIA to spread messages.

The government is
paying off reporters to spread disinformation.

A
4-part BBC documentary called the "Century of the Self" shows that an American - Freud's nephew, Edward Bernays - created the modern field of manipulation of public perceptions, and the U.S. government has extensively used his techniques.

The Independent
discusses allegations of American propaganda.

One of the premier writers on journalism
says the U.S. has used widespread propaganda.

Indeed, an expert on propaganda testified under oath during trial that
the CIA employs THOUSANDS of reporters and OWNS its own media organizations (the expert has an impressive background).

Of course, the Web has become a huge media force, and the Pentagon and other government agencies have their hand in that as well.

Second-Hand Propaganda for the Rich and Powerful

But stories directly crafted by CIA and other government employees isn't the only form of presstitution.

Popular MSNBC anchor Cenk Uygur was recently told to tone down his attacks on the establishment because the head of the network reminded him, "we're part of the establishment."

Newseek's Evan Thomas admitted in 2009:

By definition, establishments believe in propping up the existing order. Members of the ruling class have a vested interest in keeping things pretty much the way they are. Safeguarding the status quo, protecting traditional institutions, can be healthy and useful, stabilizing and reassuring....

"If you are of the establishment persuasion (and I am). . . ."

Virtually all mainstream reporters are "establishment" journalists like Thomas.

The Pew Research Center study on the coverage of the crisis found that the media has largely parroted what the White House and Wall Street were saying.

The government, Wall Street and media all
dispense happy talk when there is an economic crash.

Financial insider and commentator Yves Smith wrote an essay entitled "MSM Reporting as Propaganda" arguing that the government has been using propaganda to make people think that things are getting better, no one is angry, and - therefore - no one should get upset:

The message, quite overtly, is: if you are pissed, you are in a minority. The country has moved on. Things are getting better, get with the program...

Per the social psychology research, this “you are in a minority, you are wrong” message DOES dissuade a lot of people. It is remarkably poisonous. And it discourages people from taking concrete action.

Arianna Huffington points out:

There is something in the current DC/NY culture that equates a lack of unthinking boosterism with a lack of patriotism. As if not being drunk on the latest Dow gains is somehow un-American.
Or if "shock doctrine" medicine is being pedaled by the powers-that-be then overly fatalistic assessments are trumpeted on every channel.

And the corporate media is instrumental in spreading the lies which support war.



As in 2009:

There are five reasons that the mainstream media is worthless.

1. Self-Censorship by Journalists

Initially, there is tremendous self-censorship by journalists.

For example, several months after 9/11, famed news anchor Dan Rather told the BBC that American reporters were practicing "a form of self-censorship":

There was a time in South Africa that people would put flaming tires around peoples' necks if they dissented. And in some ways the fear is that you will be necklaced here, you will have a flaming tire of lack of patriotism put around your neck. Now it is that fear that keeps journalists from asking the toughest of the tough questions.... And again, I am humbled to say, I do not except myself from this criticism.

What we are talking about here - whether one wants to recognise it or not, or call it by its proper name or not - is a form of self-censorship.

Keith Olbermann agreed that there is self-censorship in the American media, and that:
You can rock the boat, but you can never say that the entire ocean is in trouble .... You cannot say: By the way, there's something wrong with our .... system.

As former Washington Post columnist Dan Froomkin wrote in 2006:

Mainstream-media political journalism is in danger of becoming increasingly irrelevant, but not because of the Internet, or even Comedy Central. The threat comes from inside. It comes from journalists being afraid to do what journalists were put on this green earth to do. . . .

There’s the intense pressure to maintain access to insider sources, even as those sources become ridiculously unrevealing and oversensitive. There’s the fear of being labeled partisan if one’s bullshit-calling isn’t meted out in precisely equal increments along the political spectrum.

If mainstream-media political journalists don’t start calling bullshit more often, then we do risk losing our primacy — if not to the comedians then to the bloggers.

I still believe that no one is fundamentally more capable of first-rate bullshit-calling than a well-informed beat reporter - whatever their beat. We just need to get the editors, or the corporate culture, or the self-censorship – or whatever it is – out of the way.

2. Censorship by Higher-Ups

If journalists do want to speak out about an issue, they also are subject to tremendous pressure by their editors or producers to kill the story.

The Pulitzer prize-winning reporter who uncovered the Iraq prison torture scandal and the Mai Lai massacre in Vietnam, Seymour Hersh, said:

"All of the institutions we thought would protect us -- particularly the press, but also the military, the bureaucracy, the Congress -- they have failed. The courts . . . the jury's not in yet on the courts. So all the things that we expect would normally carry us through didn't. The biggest failure, I would argue, is the press, because that's the most glaring....

Q: What can be done to fix the (media) situation?

[Long pause] You'd have to fire or execute ninety percent of the editors and executives. You'd actually have to start promoting people from the newsrooms to be editors who you didn't think you could control. And they're not going to do that."

In fact many journalists are warning that the true story is not being reported. See this announcement and this talk.

And a series of interviews with award-winning journalists also documents censorship of certain stories by media editors and owners (and see these samples).

There are many reasons for censorship by media higher-ups.

One is money.

The media has a strong monetary interest to avoid controversial topics in general. It has always been true that advertisers discourage stories which challenge corporate power. Indeed, a 2003 survey reveals that 35% of reporters and news executives themselves admitted that journalists avoid newsworthy stories if “the story would be embarrassing or damaging to the financial interests of a news organization’s owners or parent company.”

In addition, the government has allowed tremendous consolidation in ownership of the airwaves during the past decade.

Dan Rather has slammed media consolidation:

Likening media consolidation to that of the banking industry, Rather claimed that “roughly 80 percent” of the media is controlled by no more than six, and possibly as few as four, corporations.

This is documented by the following must-see charts prepared by:

And check out this list of interlocking directorates of big media companies from Fairness and Accuracy in Media, and this resource from the Columbia Journalism Review to research a particular company.

This image gives a sense of the decline in diversity in media ownership over the last couple of decades:

The large media players stand to gain billions of dollars in profits if the Obama administration continues to allow monopoly ownership of the airwaves by a handful of players. The media giants know who butters their bread. So there is a spoken or tacit agreement: if the media cover the administration in a favorable light, the MSM will continue to be the receiver of the government's goodies.

3. Drumming Up Support for War

In addition, the owners of American media companies have long actively played a part in drumming up support for war.

It is painfully obvious that the large news outlets studiously avoided any real criticism of the government's claims in the run up to the Iraq war. It is painfully obvious that the large American media companies acted as lapdogs and stenographers for the government's war agenda.

Veteran reporter Bill Moyers criticized the corporate media for parroting the obviously false link between 9/11 and Iraq (and the false claims that Iraq possessed WMDs) which the administration made in the run up to the Iraq war, and concluded that the false information was not challenged because:

"the [mainstream] media had been cheerleaders for the White House from the beginning and were simply continuing to rally the public behind the President — no questions asked."

And as NBC News' David Gregory (later promoted to host Meet the Press) said:

"I think there are a lot of critics who think that . . . . if we did not stand up [in the run-up to the war] and say 'this is bogus, and you're a liar, and why are you doing this,' that we didn't do our job. I respectfully disagree. It's not our role"

But this is nothing new. In fact, the large media companies have drummed up support for all previous wars.

For example, Hearst helped drum up support for the Spanish-American War.

And an official summary of America's overthrow of the democratically-elected president of Iran in the 1950's states, "In cooperation with the Department of State, CIA had several articles planted in major American newspapers and magazines which, when reproduced in Iran, had the desired psychological effect in Iran and contributed to the war of nerves against Mossadeq." (page x)

The mainstream media also may have played footsie with the U.S. government right before Pearl Harbor. Specifically, a highly-praised historian (Bob Stineet) argues that the Army’s Chief of Staff informed the Washington bureau chiefs of the major newspapers and magazines of the impending Pearl Harbor attack BEFORE IT OCCURRED, and swore them to an oath of secrecy, which the media honored (page 361) .

And the military-media alliance has continued without a break (as a highly-respected journalist says, "viewers may be taken aback to see the grotesque extent to which US presidents and American news media have jointly shouldered key propaganda chores for war launches during the last five decades.")

As the mainstream British paper, the Independent, writes:

There is a concerted strategy to manipulate global perception. And the mass media are operating as its compliant assistants, failing both to resist it and to expose it. The sheer ease with which this machinery has been able to do its work reflects a creeping structural weakness which now afflicts the production of our news.

The article in the Independent discusses the use of "black propaganda" by the U.S. government, which is then parroted by the media without analysis; for example, the government forged a letter from al Zarqawi to the "inner circle" of al-Qa'ida's leadership, urging them to accept that the best way to beat US forces in Iraq was effectively to start a civil war, which was then publicized without question by the media..

So why has the American press has consistenly served the elites in disseminating their false justifications for war?

One of of the reasons is because the large media companies are owned by those who support the militarist agenda or even directly profit from war and terror (for example, NBC - which is being sold to Comcast - was owned by General Electric, one of the largest defense contractors in the world -- which directly profits from war, terrorism and chaos).

Another seems to be an unspoken rule that the media will not criticize the government's imperial war agenda.

And the media support isn't just for war: it is also for various other shenanigans by the powerful. For example, a BBC documentary proves:

There was "a planned coup in the USA in 1933 by a group of right-wing American businessmen . . . . The coup was aimed at toppling President Franklin D Roosevelt with the help of half-a-million war veterans. The plotters, who were alleged to involve some of the most famous families in America, (owners of Heinz, Birds Eye, Goodtea, Maxwell Hse & George Bush’s Grandfather, Prescott) believed that their country should adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini to beat the great depression."

Moreover, "the tycoons told the general who they asked to carry out the coup that the American people would accept the new government because they controlled all the newspapers."

See also this book.

Have you ever heard of this scheme before? It was certainly a very large one. And if the conspirators controlled the newspapers then, how much worse is it today with media consolidation?

4. Access

Politico reveals:

For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post has offered lobbyists and association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to "those powerful few": Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and — at first — even the paper’s own reporters and editors...

The offer — which essentially turns a news organization into a facilitator for private lobbyist-official encounters — was a new sign of the lengths to which news organizations will go to find revenue at a time when most newspapers are struggling for survival.
That may be one reason that the mainstream news commentators hate bloggers so much. The more people who get their news from blogs instead of mainstream news sources, the smaller their audience, and the less the MSM can charge for the kind of "nonconfrontational access" which leads to puff pieces for the big boys.

5. Censorship by the Government

Finally, as if the media's own interest in promoting war is not strong enough, the government has exerted tremendous pressure on the media to report things a certain way. Indeed, at times the government has thrown media owners and reporters in jail if they've been too critical. The media companies have felt great pressure from the government to kill any real questioning of the endless wars.

For example, Dan Rather said, regarding American media, "What you have is a miniature version of what you have in totalitarian states".

Tom Brokaw said "all wars are based on propaganda.

And the head of CNN said:

There was 'almost a patriotism police' after 9/11 and when the network showed [things critical of the administration's policies] it would get phone calls from advertisers and the administration and "big people in corporations were calling up and saying, 'You're being anti-American here.'

Indeed, former military analyst and famed Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that the government has ordered the media not to cover 9/11:

Ellsberg seemed hardly surprised that today's American mainstream broadcast media has so far failed to take [former FBI translator and 9/11 whistleblower Sibel] Edmonds up on her offer, despite the blockbuster nature of her allegations [which Ellsberg calls "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers"].

As Edmonds has also alluded, Ellsberg pointed to the New York Times, who "sat on the NSA spying story for over a year" when they "could have put it out before the 2004 election, which might have changed the outcome."

"There will be phone calls going out to the media saying 'don't even think of touching it, you will be prosecuted for violating national security,'" he told us.

* * *

"I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to 'How do we deal with Sibel?'" contends Ellsberg. "The first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn't get into the media. I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to to the government and they would be told 'don't touch this . . . .'"

- Page 6 of the declassified CIA document: "PAO [Public Affairs Office] now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation. This has helped us turn some intelligence failure stories into intelligence success stories, and it has contributed to the accuracy of countless others. In many instances, we have persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources and methods."

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Nicolas Sarkozy involved in offering bribes to Saudi official for Airbus deal...


Bribes of Saudi officials rampant under multiple U.S. administrations....

July , 2011 -- Nicolas Sarkozy involved in offering bribes to Saudi official for Airbus deal...

In what may prove to be an old scandal but one that could come back to further tarnish his already poor image, French President Nicolas MOSSAD Sarkozy has been heavily implicated in a bribery scandal from the 1990s involving an Airbus deal to supply Saudia Airlines with commercial passenger planes.

The French government, then led by Prime Minister Edouard Balladur, a political mentor of Sarkozy offered to pay a bribe to a major Saudi official in return for a $6 billion contract with the Saudi Ministry of Defense and Aviation (MODA) to re-supply Saudia with aircraft. We have learned from a source involved with the Saudi contract negotiations that Sarkozy, France's Budget Minister at the time, and working for CIA/MOSSAD..., was Balladur's "right-hand man" in offering the bribe to the Saudi official, said to be a high-level prince in the Zioconned Saudi government.

Balladur traveled to Saudi Arabia in January 1994 to personally lobby King Fahd for the contract with Airbus. However, President George H. W. Bush had sealed a deal with the Saudis in 1992 for McDonnell-Douglas to supply 72 F-15 fighter jets to the Saudis in a $4 billion deal, with $600 million to Pratt and Whitney for jet engines and an additional $1 billion in "commissions" paid to the same top Saudi prince through a MODA account maintained at Riggs Bank. George H. W. Bush's brother Jonathan Bush became the President of Riggs Investment after the bank bought his J. Bush & Co. in 1997.

In the McDonnell-Douglas "deal" with the Saudis, a package that totaled $5.6 billion, Bush believed he could deliver his promise of election year jobs to the people of St. Louis, where the planes would be built. Bush made the promise to McDonnell-Douglas workers and their families in a speech at Lambert Field on September 11, 1992. Missouri was a key battleground state between Bush and Bill Clinton. In the end, the bribe paid to the Saudi prince, a noted friend of the Bush family, had no impact on Missouri. Clinton won the state's 11 electoral votes.

In detailed information provided to us by an aviation industry top executive who was involved with the sensitive negotiations, we learned that the original jet fighter deal worked out between Bush and King Fahd had an additional sweetener: the Saudia commercial plane deal was to go to Boeing to the tune of $4 billion for Boeing, $1.2 billion for General Electric engines, $420 million for Pratt and Whitney/International Aero Engines (IAE) engines, $1.6 billion for McDonnell-Douglas to help it keep it from curtailing production at its Long Beach, California commercial aircraft plant. The total contract was worth $7.2 billion. In addition, our source reports that a "commission" (bribe) equaling $250 million, was paid to Saudi banker Khalid bin Mahfouz, the brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden and the owner of the National Commercial Bank of Saudi Arabia. Bin Mahfouz, who died of a sudden heart attack in 2009, threatened to sue major publications who reported that he was the brother-in-law of Bin Laden, even after CIA director testified in 1998 that Bin Mahfouz was Bin Laden's brother-in-law. Woolsey and major publications, including the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, later retracted the report on the brother-in-law link between the two Saudis....

In 1997 Boeing and McDonnell-Douglas merged, strengthening the combined company's influence in the Zioconned Wahhabi Saudi Arabia.

In 1995, when the Saudia airline contract was being considered, Balladur had no way of knowing that the Clinton administration had been apprised of the Boeing deal with the Saudis and that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) had intercepted communications between Balladur and his Budget Minister Sarkozy....LOL...., offering the Saudis bribes in return for Saudia awarding its contract for new planes to Airbus. In the end, the Saudis nixed the deal with Balladur and Sarkozy. Sarkozy's involvement with the Saudi bribery scandal mirrors similar allegations of receiving kickbacks in return for French defense contracts with Taiwan and Pakistan.

However, we have learned that the French bribery involvement with the Saudis pales in comparison with bribes and kickbacks involving top Saudis and U.S. politicians, particularly George H. W. and George W. Bush. We have learned that violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by U.S. corporations in deals with the Saudis have totaled $350 billion. $83 billion from U.S. bribes have been placed in special Saudi fund devoted to squelching civil dissent in Saudi Arabia. The Siamese Twins, CIA/MOSSAD are fully supportive of the Zioconned Wahhabi-Salafist "arrangement....".



Friday, July 15, 2011

Muqtada Al-Sadr, the CIA's Ayatollah, toys with US's Iraq intentions...


Muqtada Al-Sadr, the CIA's Ayatollah, toys with US's Iraq intentions...
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON - The big question looming over United States-Iraqi negotiations on a US military presence after 2011 is what game Shi'ite leader Muqtada al-Sadr is playing on the issue.

United States officials regard Muqtada as still resisting the US military presence illegally and are demanding that Muqtada call off his Promised Day Brigades completely.

But Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's main point of contact with Muqtada says he is playing a double game and does not intend to obstruct the negotiations on a deal for the stationing of 10,000 or more US troops from 2012 onward.

Muqtada made a crucial move over the weekend toward accepting such an agreement between the Barack Obama administration and the Maliki government, according to a senior Iraqi intelligence official in the International Liaison Office (ILO). The ILO is an arm of Iraqi military intelligence that is run by a former East German intelligence official who was Muqtada's political adviser during the height of the US war against the Sadrists in 2007-08.

Muqtada agreed in an unpublicized direct exchange of views with Maliki that he would not exploit a request by Maliki to Obama to station US troops in Iraq beyond this year by attacking Maliki politically or threatening his government, the senior Iraqi intelligence official told Inter Press Service (IPS).

The popular Shi'ite leader has maintained a longstanding threat to withdraw support from the government over the US military presence. But when questioned directly by Maliki about his intentions, Muqtada agreed that there would be no repeat of his 2006 withdrawal of Sadrist ministers from Maliki's first government over that issue, according to an account of the exchange provided by the Iraqi intelligence official.

http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html

"Maliki called Sadr's bluff," he said.

Muqtada's ambiguous position on the US troop presence is understood by the ILO to be key to his role as kingmaker in Maliki's government, as well as his need to maintain the support of the poor and dispossessed Shi'ite who represent his political power base.

"He has to placate two different constituencies," the official told IPS. That means taking a hard line on the US troop presence in Arabic language public statements meant for his Shi'ite constituency, but taking an accommodating line in private contacts with Maliki.

Muqtada has displayed an uncompromising posture toward the US military presence in recent weeks. The Promised Day Brigade, which Muqtada created in 2008 to fight against US forces, had attacked US bases and troop convoys in June. The establishment of the brigade followed the disbanding of Muqtada's Mahdi Army in June 2008

The brigade issued a statement on June 28 claiming responsibility for 10 mortar and Katyusha rocket attacks against US bases around the country as well as attacks on US military convoys, saying that the attacks had "killed and wounded a number of US soldiers".

Attacks by Shi'ite militias killed 15 US troops in June - the highest monthly total of troops killed in combat since June 2008.

United States officials in Baghdad included the Promised Day Brigade among the three Shi'ite militias they said had been funded and armed by Iran and had killed US troops.

Last weekend, in a statement posted on his website, Muqtada said nothing to disassociate himself from the Promised Day Brigade's operations against US forces or its claim of responsibility for killing US troops. Instead, he announced the brigade would have the "mission" of "resisting" US troops if they are not all gone by December 31 - the deadline for withdrawal under the agreement signed by George W Bush in November 2008.

But the ILO has been telling officials at the White House and the Pentagon that, in order to avoid antagonizing Washington, Muqtada had ordered the brigade to limit its attacks to "hard targets" - installations and armored vehicles - to minimize the likelihood of US casualties, according to the senior Iraqi intelligence official.

The ILO has dismissed the statement by the brigade claiming to have killed and wounded US troops as coming from a hardline faction within the Sadrist movement close to Iran. It says this faction was hoping to force Muqtada's hand on the negotiations on a US troop presence.

The ILO official points to Muqtada's actions over the weekend as evidence that he has made significant accommodations to allow the negotiations to go forward.

The Muqtada statement, posted on the same weekend as his exchange with Maliki, said the Promised Day Brigade would be given the mission of resisting US occupation if and when the US troops were not withdrawn.

A Sadrist legislator, Mushriq Naji, made the same point in an interview with Aswat al-Iraq newspaper on July 11. "The Promised Day Brigade is carrying out the missions of resistance now and in the future," he said, "in the event of non-withdrawal of the Americans".

That message appeared to contradict the June 28 statement from the brigade that said that the attacks would continue.

Muqtada's statement also withdrew a threat he had made in April to "restart the activities of the Mahdi Army" if the US didn't withdraw by the end of the year. The reactivation of the Mahdi Army had been regarded as part of an implicit threat to bring down the government over the issue of US troops.

But US officials aren't buying the idea that Muqtada is playing a double game. Asked if anyone involved in Iraq policy believed Muqtada had signaled that he would tacitly allow the negotiations to go ahead, one official said, "I don't think so."

Major General Jeffrey Buchanan, official spokesman for United States Forces-Iraq, vehemently denied in response to an e-mail query from IPS that Muqtada was restraining the Promised Day Brigade in relation to US forces.

"Last month, PDB [Promised Day Brigades] claimed responsibility for 52 attacks against US forces," Buchanan said, adding that claims that the brigade had not caused any casualties to US forces and that Muqtada would not obstruct negotiations on an agreement "carry no credibility in our eyes whatsoever".

Civilian officials working on Iraq take a more nuanced view of Muqtada, but are not yet convinced that he will acquiesce to a US presence beyond 2011. "It's still unclear what Sadr is doing," said one US official who follows the issue closely. "He doesn't seem to have stable preferences on this issue."

The official added that he is "99% sure" that the Promised Day Brigade had caused some casualties among US troops. He concedes, however, that most of those casualties have come from two much smaller Shi'ite militia groups, neither of which is regarded as responsive to Muqtada's direct command.

The US demand that Muqtada give up the Promised Day Brigades entirely is one that he probably could not meet without risking the loss of his Shi'ite political base. If an agreement were reached in time on stationing US troops beyond this year, Muqtada would have to go through at least the motions of attacking US military installations, according to the ILO official.

If tensions between the US military and Muqtada continue to rise, Muqtada may reverse course and drop the covert inside game he is said to have adopted. Ironically, the US inability or unwillingness to play along with a Muqtada double game on a US troop presence could help Iran stymie the US effort to preserve a rapidly dwindling influence in Iraq.




Sunday, July 10, 2011

A pair of "suicides" (murders) in the UK threaten the premiership of the Ziocon David Cameron....


July , 2011 -- Christopher Shale murder linked to that of Dr. David Kelly...

A well-placed UK source has informed us that the suspicious death of Prime Minister David Cameron's friend and political adviser, Christopher Shale, found dead in a portable toilet on June 25 at the Glastonbury Festival, was, in fact, a political assassination designed to silence an emerging critic of Conservative Party policies. Shale was the chairman of the West Oxfordshire Conservative Association. Shale had written a memo containing a scathing attack on Tory policies under Cameron's leadership. The memo was due to be published in The Mail on Sunday, the day after Shale's body was found in the toilet.

Cameron later said he was "shocked" by the death of his friend. Shale's death was alternately described as a "suicide" and heart attack.

However, we have been informed that Shale's suspected disloyalty to the Tories resulted in worries at Number 10 Downing Street that the longtime friend of and adviser to Cameron might have decided talk about a Tory scandal dating from the late 1980s and early 1990s. Cameron visited South Africa in 1989 on a trip financed by the South African armaments company Armscor. It was the same year that South Africa began dismantling its nuclear weapons program.

As South Africa began to transition from apartheid to majority rule in the early 1990s, Shale, a British Army veteran, visited South Africa as part of a UKaid (Department of International Development) mission. After leaving the army, Shale established two companies, SGL Communications and Oxford Resources Ltd. Shale also visited Rwanda on numerous occasions as part of his work for UKaid. There is some evidence that Shale was involved with MI6 activities in Africa.

However, it was Shale's work in South Africa, establishing links with the African National Congress and other black political parties in an attempt to undo some of the damage resulting from Margaret Thatcher's support for the apartheid regime, that put him in contact with the British Ministry of Defense scientist charged with overseeing the transfer of South Africa's nuclear weapons and other nuclear materials to Western hands from South African nuclear weapons stocks at the Pelindaba nuclear research center, near Pretoria. That scientist was Dr. David Kelly, Britain's foremost authority on weapons of mass destruction, who was found dead from a reported "suicide" near his Oxfordshire home on July 17, 2003.

Kelly had questioned faulty intelligence on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, intelligence that was used to justify Britain's involvement in the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Kelly was said to have committed suicide with an old pocket knife and pain killers, an allegation rejected by a number of British experts and politicians, including Norman Baker, the Liberal Democratic MP for Lewes.

We have been informed that Shale became aware of Cameron's role in trafficking on the international black market of South African nuclear weapons and technology that was entrusted to Britain and the United States by South Africa's apartheid government, led by President F. W. DeKlerk.

Shale, we are told, was familiar with Cameron's role in the re-selling of South Africa's nuclear materials, with the proceeds going into the political coffers of the Conservative Party. Kelly and Shale were reportedly both aware that some of the South African nuclear weapons technology ended up, via an international arms smuggling network, in the hands of North Korea, which tested a nuclear bomb on May 25, 2009.

In 2010, at a 47-nation nuclear security summit in Washington, President Obama praised South African President Jacob Zuma and South Africa for successfully abandoning the nation's nuclear arsenal. What Obama did not mention was that part of the arsenal was successfully abandoned to the international arms black market, a fact known by the CIA's counter-proliferation division, which was also aware that Obama was aware of the temporary storage of the South African weapons in Chicago and the involvement of Argonne National Laboratory in their disposal during the early 1990s, while Obama was working at the Hopkins & Sutter law firm and later as a visiting fellow at the University of Chicago Law School.

Obama was awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," in particular his promotion of nuclear non-proliferation. In 2005, then-Senator Obama, along with Senator Richard Lugar, visited a Russian nuclear facility at Perm. There have been reports that Obama was detained briefly by Russian officials on the suspicion that he was engaged in espionage activities at the facility. Obama's long-time work for the CIA may have extended into his term as a U.S. senator from Illinois and, quite possibly, into the White House. During the 2008 presidential campaign, a CIA source who worked on the agency's nuclear non-proliferation activities, told us: "You have no idea what the fuck you're getting with this guy [Obama]!

With Shale "going wobbly" on the Conservatives, it was feared that he might reveal the dark past of Tory involvement in nuclear weapons smuggling, something that helped seal his fate. The Tory connection to nuclear weapons smuggling is so sensitive, British intelligence insiders believe that, if revealed, Cameron will be forced to resign and his deputy prime minister, Liberal Democrat Nick Clegg, will move into Number 10.

On February 28, 2008, we reported:

"[Dr. David Kelly, the British Defense Ministry scientist] knew of nuclear weapons proliferation involving three South African nuclear bombs assembled with the help of Israeli nuclear scientists at the covert South African nuclear weapons facility at Pelindaba nuclear research facility, near Pretoria. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors who visited Pelindaba and the state-owned Armaments Corporation of South Africa (ARMSCOR) Advena nuclear facility near Pretoria in 1990 and 1991 were tricked into believing that South Africa's nuclear weapons had all been dismantled by the outgoing apartheid regime. However, three South African nuclear weapons were reportedly sold to 'private investors' with the up-front money coming from British government coffers.

Note: In 2007, speaking to a Conservative Friends of Israel meeting, Cameron referred to himself as a "Zionist."

Reimbursement for the ARMSCOR nuclear weapons was made to Britain only after the three weapons, spirited out of South Africa in three 20' ISO standard containers, arrived at a private storage facility in Oman for safekeeping. The containers had a special seal on the lock of the rear door of each container along with a temperature gauge in the front of the containers that was connected to the core of the bombs to indicate that the bomb was not overheating inside the containers.

Note: According to more recent information provided to us, the three weapons were to be shipped with an additional three nuclear bombs to Chicago for covert storage at a furniture warehouse, a CIA front activity. The fissile material from three South African bombs that made it to Chicago was later extracted at the Argonne National Laboratory, 25 miles southwest of Chicago. However, the three other bombs in Oman "disappeared" en route to Chicago. The British official who was in charge of the warehousing of the weapons in Oman was David Kelly.

There are indications that one of the bombs was eventually sold to North Korea.

We have also learned that the nuclear smuggling operations involved top members of the British Conservative Party, including individuals close to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. The Tory party soon received a mystery donation of £17.8 million. The donation was filed with the Tory party's Fiscal Year 1992 Annual Accounts filed with Companies House. An insider at the Tory party's Central Office tipped off a Labor Party Member of Parliament, Doug Hoyle, about the mystery donations to Tory MPs. It turned out that one of the Tory MPs in question was Tim Smith.
[Smith resigned after he was discovered to have accepted cash payments from Mohamed Al-Fayed, the former owner of Harrods's and the ex-brother-in-law of international arms trafficker and Iran-contra principal Adnan Khashoggi.] Smith had been an MP for Beaconsfield since 1982 when he defeated a little-known Labor candidate named Tony Blair."......


Website for this image

On 14 July 2011, we suggested that the
Christopher Shale "murder" could be linked to that of Dr. David Kelly

"A well-placed UK source has informed us that the suspicious death of Prime Minister David Cameron’s friend and political adviser, Christopher Shale, found dead in a portable toilet (on 26 June 2011) at the Glastonbury Festival, was, in fact, a political assassination designed to silence an emerging critic of Conservative Party policies...

"WMR has been informed that Shale’s suspected disloyalty to the Tories resulted in worries at Number 10 Downing Street that the longtime friend of and adviser to Cameron might have decided talk about a Tory scandal dating from the late 1980s and early 1990s.

"Cameron visited South Africa in 1989 on a trip financed by the South African armaments company Armscor.

"It was the same year that South Africa began dismantling its nuclear weapons program.

"As South Africa began to transition from apartheid to majority rule in the early 1990s, Shale, a British Army veteran, visited South Africa as part of a UKaid (Department of International Development) mission.

"After leaving the army, Shale established two companies, SGL Communications and Oxford Resources Ltd.

"Shale also visited Rwanda on numerous occasions as part of his work for UKaid.

"There is some evidence that Shale was involved with MI6 activities in Africa.

Shale and Cameron

"However, it was Shale’s work in South Africa, establishing links with the African National Congress and other black political parties in an attempt to undo some of the damage resulting from Margaret Thatcher’s support for the apartheid regime, that put him in contact with the British Ministry of Defense scientist charged with overseeing the transfer of South Africa’s nuclear weapons and other nuclear materials to Western hands from South African nuclear weapons stocks at the Pelindaba nuclear research center, near Pretoria.

"That scientist was Dr. David Kelly, Britain’s foremost authority on weapons of mass destruction, who was found dead from a reported “suicide” near his Oxfordshire home on July 17, 2003...

"We have been informed that Shale became aware of Cameron’s role in trafficking on the international black market of South African nuclear weapons and technology that was entrusted to Britain and the United States by South Africa’s apartheid government, led by President F. W. DeKlerk.

"Shale, we are told, was familiar with Cameron’s role in the re-selling of South Africa’s nuclear materials, with the proceeds going into the political coffers of the Conservative Party.

"Kelly and Shale were reportedly both aware that some of the South African nuclear weapons technology ended up, via an international arms smuggling network, in the hands of North Korea, which tested a nuclear bomb on May 25, 2009.

"In 2010, at a 47-nation nuclear security summit in Washington, President Obama praised South African President Jacob Zuma and South Africa for successfully abandoning the nation’s nuclear arsenal.

"What Obama did not mention was that part of the arsenal was successfully abandoned to the international arms black market, a fact known by the CIA’s counter-proliferation division, which was also aware that Obama was aware of
the temporary storage of the South African weapons in Chicago and the involvement of Argonne National Laboratory in their disposal during the early 1990s, while Obama was working at the Hopkins & Sutter law firm and later as a visiting fellow at the University of Chicago Law School...

" In 2005, then-Senator Obama, along with Senator Richard Lugar, visited a Russian nuclear facility at Perm.

"There have been reports that Obama was detained briefly by Russian officials on the suspicion that he was engaged in espionage activities at the facility.

"Obama’s long-time work for the CIA may have extended into his term as a U.S. senator from Illinois and, quite possibly, into the White House.

"During the 2008 presidential campaign, a CIA source who worked on the agency’s nuclear non-proliferation activities, told WMR: “You have no idea what the fuck you’re getting with this guy [Obama]!

"With Shale “going wobbly” on the Conservatives, it was feared that he might reveal the dark past of Tory involvement in nuclear weapons smuggling, something that helped seal his fate."

Hackgate update July 20th, 2011 /

http://canspeccy.blogspot.com/



Tuesday, July 05, 2011

United we win divided we fall, unity of purpose and unity in action...



United we win divided we fall, unity of purpose and unity in action...

Rudyard Kipling:
"Now it is not good for the Christian's health
To hustle the Aryan brown,
For the Christian riles and the Aryan smiles,
And it weareth the Christian down.
And the end of the fight
Is a tombstone white
With the name of the late deceased
And the epitaph drear: "A fool lies here
who tried to hustle the East."


The slimy Wahhabi king's men
Have betrayed us
Tricked us out of
Our homes

No one else
Gonna save us
We must stand up
On our own

Divided
We've been conquered
For too long
We've played their game

United
We'd be invincible
So rise up
And shake off our chains

We've been fooled by UNIIIC & STL
By the bankers, And the priests
By The infamous White House Murder INC,
By UNSC and the CIA/MOSSAD scoundrels
By Asef Shawkat, W, Cheney, Tenet, Sharon,
Dagan, Halevy, Yaakov and other sub-human
criminals and assassins....

We've been ruled
By the con men
The scoundrel
And the thief

Divided
We've been conquered
For too long
We've played their game

United
We'd be invincible
So rise up
And shake off your Ziocon chains...

'Ye who suffer woes untold,
Or to feel, or to behold
Your lost country bought and sold
With a price of blood and gold -

'Let a vast assembly be,
And with great solemnity
Declare with measured words that ye
Are, as God has made ye, free -

'And these words shall then become
Like Oppression's thundered doom
Ringing through each heart and brain,
Heard again - again - again -

'Rise like Lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number -
Shake your chains to earth like dew
Which in sleep had fallen on you -
Ye are many - they are few.'



Monday, July 04, 2011

The STL/TSL mountain of utter Ziocon/Western lies giving birth to a mouse....


The STL/TSL mountain of utter Ziocon/Western lies giving birth to a mouse....


Now that the Special Tribunal for Lebanon has confirmed an indictment in the February 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister, the international BANDIT Rafik Hariri and subsequent crimes, we’re in a better position to assess the success of the investigation that led to this long-awaited moment. And what we’re seeing is not encouraging.

Until now, the tribunal appears to have accused Hezbollah members of involvement in the Hariri killing. Four Lebanese are said to be in the crosshairs of Daniel CIA Bellemare, the tribunal’s prosecutor. From what we know, mainly information in documents leaked to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, which used them last year as the basis of a crooked intelligence inspired
documentary, several of the suspects were identified through analyses of cellular telephone conversations....

This is all fascinating stuff, and may not be true because it was a CIA/MOSSAD fabrication wall to wall.... However, if the indictment stops there, then we will at best have been offered a narrow glimpse of what actually took place. After six years of investigation led by three separate commissioners, with millions of dollars spent, the results would be desperately short of expectations. In fact, it would represent a black mark on the United Nations.

Unconfirmed reports on Thursday suggested that the special tribunal team was preparing to head to Damascus after Beirut, to announce the indictment of Syrians. This was untrue, and yet the credibility of the investigative phase, and of the special tribunal itself, will very much depend on whether Syrians are called to the suspects’ dock....But, the infamous White House Murder INC, has pretty much made a deal with the devil himself, the Killer Asef Shawkat in 2007/2008, when he deliberately assassinated Imad F. Mughnieh in Damascus on behalf of CIA/MOSSAD/DGSE, in return for total immunity from prosecution in the operation he was Bamboozled to carry out in the first place by CIA/MOSSAD creeps.....


وحتى لا يذهب دم الشهداء هدرا

ان ثمة عيوبا قانونية شابت الاجراءات التي اتخذتها المحكمة وهي في صدد التحقيق في جريمة ....منذ أغتيال الوزير الراحل شهيدنا البطل الرئيس ايلي حبيقة ورفاقه من تأمين شهود الزور وحمايتهم، اضافة الى الفساد والتعامل مع العدو الصهيوني والسوري وتزويدهم بمعلومات لتقويتهم على شريحة من الامة اللبنانية وهي المقاومة اللبنانية وهي جريمة حسب القانون اللبناني

Here’s why. Soon after Hariri’s elimination, the United Nations sent an Irish policeman, Peter CIA Fitzgerald, to Beirut to look into the matter. In his report, Fitzgerald
concluded that it had taken “considerable finance, military precision in its execution, [and] substantial logistical support” to carry out the assassination. In other words, the former prime minister had been the victim of a conspiracy that the Syrian and Lebanese security services could hardly have avoided noticing.

If there were any doubts, in a report from October 2005, Detlev BND Mehlis, the first commissioner of the United Nations International Independent Investigation Commission,
wrote something very similar. Given the “infiltration of Lebanese institutions and society by the Syrian and Lebanese intelligence services working in tandem,” he observed, “it would be difficult to envisage a scenario whereby such a complex assassination plot could have been carried out without their knowledge.” Once again, a seasoned investigator was describing an extensive conspiracy, one that went well beyond a small group of Hezbollah participants and their superiors. Fitzgerald and Mehlis bluntly implicated Syria and their Lebanese proxies in the plot....willfully ignoring the deeds of the most infamous White House Murder INC, since January 24th 2002...

Mehlis’ successor, Serge CIA Brammertz, continued to suspect Syria. This we know because in 2006 he revealed to the US ambassador in Lebanon, Jeffrey CIA-Chief assassin Feltman, that he
believed only a single Syrian intelligence agency had participated in Hariri’s murder. “If anything, you probably had one security service involved, and the order came from on high and, how high, we’ll have to figure out,” Feltman quoted Brammertz as telling him. An educated guess suggests that the commissioner was referring to Syrian Military Intelligence and Asef Shawkat in particular...., which had a vast network of goons within the Lebanese Deep State....already in place throughout Lebanon.

However, Brammertz/CIA, according to Lebanese and non-Lebanese sources very familiar with his work, did not much advance in his investigation and this was utterly intentional and it is clear that it was a deliberate CIA/MOSSAD instructions...in order to time the whole charade according to their dirty wishes.... However, he took a momentous decision in altering the investigative strategy set by his predecessor. Mehlis had approached his inquiry using a top-down approach. “The Hariri case is an unusual one. Usually in investigations you start at the bottom and work your way up. In the Hariri case we started pretty much at the top and worked down. We had an accurate view of how the assassination took place from above, but less clear a view of what happened on the ground.”

With Brammertz, however, there was a very noticeable decline in interviews of high-level suspects, in Lebanon and especially in Syria, by way of direct CIA/MOSSAD clear instructions.... According to onetime commission members, the commissioner brought in analysts but cut back on police investigators needed to gather and assess witness testimony. The top-down approach was shelved in favor of a de facto bottom-up approach, albeit a deficient one. If the CBC report is to be believed, Brammertz was as lethargic in the telephone analyses as he was in other aspects of his investigation. For example, he only brought in a British firm, FTS, to
examine telephone data near the end of his term....

It’s no surprise, then, that when Bellemare/CIA/CSIS took over he had relatively little in his files that CIA/MOSSAD/MI6/BND/DGSE had not screwed-up wall to wall.... Yet he pursued Brammertz’s bottom-up approach, meaning that he could not benefit from Mehlis’ labors. This left, principally, the telephone material to build on. Bellemare’s intention today may be to crack open that angle of the conspiracy, which as it happens implicates Hezbollah, in the hope that it will lead upwards to those Ziocon infamous White House Murder INC's senior officials who gave the order to assassinate Mr. Elie HOBEIKA January 24th 2002 and the skunk Hariri in 05....

If so, CIA's Bellemare could prove too optimistic by half....LOL. The two years of dallying during Brammertz’s time in office may have fatally crippled the Syria side of the investigation, though we have to wait to see if the Syrians are off the hook. However, no one seriously believes that Hezbollah, if the party’s involvement is proven, acted alone against the former prime minister. For now, and until proof of the contrary, the tribunal’s indictment is the mountain giving birth to a ZIOCONNED mouse through and through....in a very deliberate manner in order to spoil the perfect image of the valiant Lebanese Resistance of Hezbollah for decades to come in MENA and around the World..... :)
ALL This Western/Ziocon garbage will never change our will to defend Hezbollah, our Valiant, Nationalist Resistance for ever.


So it's a good time to bang up the latest fabricated culprits in Lebanon by the Zioconned USA and its infamous White House Murder INC, in the Levant– if you're an American Ziocon government agency – when the Israelis are frightened of another Israeli-Hezbollah war. A good time, too, to stir up another sectarian dish between the Sunnis of Hariri and the Shia Hezbollah in Lebanon when Assad's Alawis are fighting the majority Sunnis of Syria. As for those guys locked up for so many years on the say-so of the UN/CIA/MOSSAD....: released through "lack" of evidence.... Hmmm, as I always say to friends when they ask me of these matters. The problem in Lebanon is that everyone is innocent. And everyone is NOT as guilty as the Zioconned Press and the Infamous Siamese Twins CIA/MOSSAD and their tools, the odious White House Murder INC, would like to make them out to be since Sep. 1982.....