Turkey has been compelled to rethink Libya hard and fast....

Turkey has been compelled to rethink Libya hard and fast....


http://www.michelcollon.info/Libya-popular-uprising-civilian.html?lang=fr

Saud bin Faisal bin Abdul-Aziz, the tall, handsome, urbane Saudi foreign minister, has no peers. In a career spanning 36 years, he was a key player in so many high dramas that one loses count - the Iranian revolution, the Iran-Iraq war, the Afghan jihad, the Gulf War, the Taliban and al-CIAda..., the September 11, 2001 False Flag attacks, the US invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. That is, leaving out his profound contribution to the realignment of Saudi Arabia's post-Cold War foreign policy, especially with China....

But the unscheduled visit of a few hours late in the evening last Thursday to the Turkish capital of Ankara was a daunting mission to pin Turkey down to a favorable stance on the momentous developments in the region. Ankara, whose ties with Tehran dramatically improved in the recent past, had begun treading on the first circle of Saudi interests...

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan had just characterized the Saudi intervention in Bahrain as "a new Karbala". The reference was to the battle that took place in 680 between the forces of the Prophet Mohammad's grandson Husain ibn Ali and Umayyad caliph Yazid II.

Erdogan demanded a withdrawal of the Saudi forces from Bahrain, whereas Riyadh visualized a prolonged military presence as the only guarantee against a Shi'ite takeover of power in Manama.

Faisal once lamented about his own legacy in a memorable interview with New York Times when he reportedly said:

We have not yet seen moments of joy in all that time [past 36 years] ... You see the amount of water, you think you can hold something in your hand, but it falls away. Sand is the same thing. So unless there is something to hold in your hand and to point to success and as an achievement, then you have done nothing.

Faisal might have wondered whether it was water or sand he was holding in his hand as his private jet took off Thursday night ferrying him back to his home in Jeddah. Actually, he was holding something more solid.

Erdogan has since back-tracked from his Karbala statement. Two days later, Turkey force-landed an Iranian aircraft en route to Syria and confiscated materials that breached United Nations sanctions on Tehran - rocket launchers, mortars, Kalashnikov rifles and ammunition. A Turkish Foreign Ministry statement said, "The plane was allowed to leave ... without the banned material." The point being stressed is an "incident" has occurred involving Tehran, and Turkish diplomatic practices are extremely sophisticated.

What emerges is that there has been a steady shift in the past week in the way in which the Turkish leadership is viewing the regional situation. Thus far, Turkey has done well by placing itself on the right side of history in the New Middle East. The Muslim Brotherhood's tacit equations with the Supreme Council of the Egyptian Armed Forces, the Brotherhood's co-option of Salafis and its surge as the only organized force in the society and the resounding victory of the constitutional referendum (which the Brotherhood robustly backed) - these are positive trends as far as Erdogan and the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) is concerned as they provide a new Islamic ideological basis for closer Turkish-Egyptian relations.

The Arab awakening seems to hold the potential to advance Erdogan's ambitious drive to secure for Turkey what his detractors call a "neo-Ottoman" leadership role in the region.

Libya, therefore, poses a challenge for Erdogan. First, the international community's intervention in Libya sets a precedent. It is not lost on Ankara that there are stirrings of mass protest in next-door Syria. Besides, Ankara realizes that international intervention in Libya is creating a fait accompli that Turkey has no say in. Ankara began rationalizing that it is in Turkey's all-round interests to cut a role for itself in political terms in the international intervention in Libya rather than to stay aloof. Faisal's advice would have helped.

However, Turkey has to work for gaining such a role. Ankara was upset that it wasn't invited to the summit meeting in Paris on Monday to choreograph the political approach to the Western intervention in Libya. French President Nikolas Sarkozy was keen to highlight his lead role in the intervention in Libya and probably punctured Turkey's aspirations as a regional power in North Africa. Turkey reacted strongly by questioning the locus standi of the intervention and the ferocity of the French air strikes.

Following a crucial strategy session in Ankara on Monday night, Turkey concluded that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) would be the best antidote to Sarkozy's vanity fair; and if the alliance were to take a lead role in the operations, Turkey would also have its say. (All NATO decisions are taken by consensus and Turkey is a major member country.)

Turkey hopes to secure a role similar to what it has been playing in Afghanistan - participation in the International Security Assistance Force except in combat operations. Ankara also argues that like in Afghanistan, NATO operations ought to have a mandate from the UN Security Council. Finally, Turkey would want NATO operations to stay within the ambit of UN resolution 1973, which means enforcing a ceasefire, implementing a no-fly zone and rendering relief and humanitarian assistance.

Turkey has calibrated for developments on the ground creating a dynamic of their own. For example, the air strikes may fail to bring desired results in terms of Muammar Gaddafi losing control. Then what? A de facto division of Libya may ensue. This may turn out to be a long and difficult war and at some stage deployment of ground troops may become necessary. On the contrary, if Gaddafi gets ousted in the near term, who will assume power? To quote Sami Cohen, a veteran Turkish commentator wired to the establishment's thinking, "No one knows this. There is no prepared plan for it. It's just another indication of an open-ended period of uncertainty."

In sum, Turkish ambitions as a regional power - like Sarkozy's - are cruising without a compass. Meanwhile, US President Barack Obama spoke to Erdogan on Tuesday evening to ensure Turkish participation in any NATO operations. NATO officials have since revealed that Turkey will be one of the seven members of the alliance to participate in the naval operations to enforce the UN's arms embargo and that four Turkish frigates, one submarine and one reserve ship have been deployed. (Canada, Spain, UK, Greece, Italy and US contributed one frigate each so far.)

Thus, Turkey has moved into the tent, finally. Turkey has now been included in the "contact group" of NATO participating countries, which will meet in London on Tuesday to "take stock" of the implementation of resolution 1973 so far and to "take forward this work", according to a British foreign office statement.

Turkey may also have won a point by forcing France to concede that NATO be given a role in the planning and execution of the campaign. (But France has also dug in by insisting that the political leadership will lie with "contact group", which will also include representatives from the Arab League and African Union).

For all appearances, Turkey continues to ride a high horse. A columnist in the pro-government, Islamist-oriented daily Zaman, Abdulhamit Bilici wrote:

So, where does Turkey currently stand? Ankara is still behind the US resolution ... [But] Turkey is uneasy about the poor planning and one-sided nature of the operation. It is also upset with NATO secretary general Anders Fogh-Rasmussen's "we-decided-you-can-join-us" attitude ... It's unthinkable for a Turkish soldier to attack a Muslim country. But if it is included in the planning process properly, the Turkish military is ready to offer support in every platform, including NATO regarding non-combat issues. Let's see if the West will choose to help itself and the region by cooperating with Turkey or do the complete opposite by excluding Turkey.

However, in reality, Turkey has been compelled to rethink hard and fast. The "red line" was fast approaching and Turkey was punching beyond its weight. Faisal helped Ankara view matters from a realistic perspective. Erdogan visited Saudi Arabia over the weekend where the first signs began appearing in the Turkish rhetoric that a relentless process of rethink was commencing.

This seems to have been one mission at least where Faisal probably went wrong in his harsh self-appraisal during the New York Times interview an year ago that his legacy might be defined by "profound disappointment than by success"....? Time will tell....LOL

STATE Dept. Official: "What the Saudis fear is a Shia' Bahrain 'friendly & dependent' on the US not them!"

"... Veteran US officials, already concerned about the unpredictable course of events throughout the Middle East, have become increasingly uneasy about the way the Administration is course, Libya. While acknowledging the rapidly changing situation on the ground can make for hurried change of plans, these officials, nonetheless argue that a combination of inexperience and ideology has characterized White House decision making from the beginning. "The President should never have called upon Qaddafy to go before knowing whether his urging or forces on the ground would do the trick," said one US Middle East expert. Moreover, this official says that the Administration has little idea of who makes up the opposition. They know it is based in the always recalcitrant eastern part of Libya but its claim to having adherents in other parts of the country, even the leadership in Benghazi admits, cannot be named, due to fear that they will be targeted by forces loyal to the Libyan dictator.

Much of the criticism is directed at National Security Council ["NSC"] staffers, including National Security Advisor Tom Donilon, his Deputy Denis McDonough and especially staffers Ben Rhodes and Samantha Power. Donilon and McDonough are seen as having little hands-on foreign policy experience, while Rhodes and Power are considered ideologically driven. Power [Who achieved some notoriety and a demotion during the Presidential primary season for calling Hillary Clinton a "monster"] is widely regarded as advocating armed intervention in humanitarian crisis situations. With NSC meetings scheduled with little or no advance notice, officials in various Departments find themselves struggling to create a coherent strategy. "Everything seems to be geared to a 24 hour news cycle," complained one State Department official.

Somewhat ironically, the one person State Department officials see as potentially providing what one calls "adult supervision" is Dennis Ross, ...... Yet, today it appears that Ross has been somewhat marginalized by other NSC staffers, much to the chagrin of others in the Administration who argue that current policy lacks coherence.

While Libya is the "front burner" issue in the words of one US official, most US Middle East experts are more concerned about events in the Persian Gulf, specifically the uprising in Bahrain..... While US officials discount an Iranian role in the current troubles there, Saudi Arabia, by far the most important GCC member, does not. More important, the Saudis see their archrival, Iran, now two hundred miles away across the Gulf, with the Fifth fleet in between. Should a Shia led government emerge in Bahrain, in their view, the Saudis would be looking at a Iran only 12 miles away with no US fleet as a buffer [One senior State Department officials demurs, noting slyly "What the Saudis fear is a Shia Bahrain friendly to and dependent on the US, not them"].

While the situation in Bahrain is the most "delicate" to quote one Administration insider, ongoing events in Egypt remain the most important. The referendum overwhelmingly approved this week, which provides for constitutional changes and the election of a new President, has proved to be a disappointment to many reformers, both here and in Egypt. "This outcome almost precisely mirrors the one offered by [ousted President] Mubarak, says one State Department official. In the view of many, the young secular rebels who led the non-violent overthrow of Mubarak were outmaneuvered by the more savvy (Saudi influenced) Moslem Brotherhood and especially the Egyptian military. "The `Goodniks' never had a chance," says one veteran US analyst. "Their strength was mobilization not negotiations, especially with the army." In the meantime, the army has moved to consolidate its power. Among those now on trial for corruption are some businessmen who stand in the way of the military expanding its role in the Egyptian economy, say US experts. The leading military figure, Defense Minister Muhammed Tantawi, is no advocate of free market democracy, say US officials. "Tantawi is a Soviet trained general who makes Mubarak look like George Washington," cracks one veteran State Department official.

The latest and perhaps the most unexpected uprising is taking place in the Syrian town of Dara'a.... But US officials note that this massacre (Hamah) was orchestrated by the current Syrian leader's father Hafez al-Assad and his son, Bashar, has shown none of his father's ruthlessness nor, for that matter, political skills.

Meanwhile, US officials also look anxiously at the results of a similar scale of bloodletting in Yemen, which has led its previously durable leader Ali Abdullah Saleh to the brink of resignation. Until last Friday's shootings which are estimated to have taken the lives of upwards of 50 protestors, most analysts were predicting that Saleh would be able to ride out the political storm. As one veteran non-governmental observer put it several weeks ago, "Saleh has too many levers at his disposal to be ousted anytime soon." US officials who agreed with that assessment began to change their calculations.

Even the Israeli-Palestinian conflict took an uptick this week as shelling on Israeli towns and cities from Gaza dramatically increased.... However, US officials believe that considering the volatility of events in the region, especially in Egypt, the Israeli response will be "measured". As one key US official put it, "The Israelis are already nervous about who will replace Mubarak. And as distasteful as someone like Amr Mousa might be, at least he `buys into' the Camp David process." The same cannotbe said for his likely opponents."

US Officials: "Washington does not see Iran's hand behind the protests in Bahrain!"

"The United States and Saudi Arabia — whose conflicted relationship has survived oil shocks, the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the U.S. invasion of Iraq — are drifting apart faster than at any time in recent history, according to diplomats, analysts and former U.S. officials. The breach, punctuated by a series of tense diplomatic incidents in the past two weeks, could have profound implications for the U.S. role in the Middle East, even as President Barack Obama juggles major Arab upheavals from Libya to Yemen. The Saudi monarchy, which itself has been loathe to introduce democratic reforms, .... "We're not going to budge. We're not going to accept a Shiite government in Bahrain," said an Arab diplomat, who spoke frankly on condition he not be further identified.Saudi Arabia has registered its displeasure bluntly. Both Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates were rebuffed when they sought to visit the kingdom this month. The official cover story was that aging King Abdullah was too ill to receive them....... In a speech Sunday in the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former ambassador to Washington, said the Gulf countries now must look after their own security — a role played exclusively by the United States since the 1979 fall of the Shah of Iran. "Why not seek to turn the GCC into a grouping like the European Union? Why not have one unified Gulf army? Why not have a nuclear deterrent with which to face Iran — should international efforts fail to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons — or Israeli nuclear capabilities?" Turki said, according to a translation of his remarks by the UAE's state-controlled Emirates News Agency. U.S. relations with the Saudis and other Gulf monarchies "are as bad as they were after the fall of the Shah," said Gregory Gause, an expert on the region and political science professor at the University of Vermont. "The whole idea that Saudi Arabia still needs U.S. protection for anything ... we've already moved beyond that," the Arab diplomat said. He termed it "not necessarily a divorce, (but) a recalibration." ..... Despite the falling out, experts say there are limits to the U.S.-Saudi disaffection, if only because both countries share a common interest in oil flows, confronting Iran and countering al Qaida and other violent Islamic extremist groups....... Saudi Arabia is moving on its own to secure its interests in neighboring Yemen, where Saudi-and-U.S.-backed President Ali Abdullah Saleh is barely clinging to power after weeks of protests..... U.S. officials acknowledge stark differences with the Saudis over Egypt and Bahrain. Washington does not see Iran's hand behind the protests in Bahrain, they said, nor does it view the entire region through the sectarian lens that the Gulf monarchies do...."

http://ehrlum.com/v2010/sages/index.htm

http://www.just-international.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4363:coalition-of-crusaders-join-with-al-qaeda-to-oust-qaddafi-and-roll-back-libyan-revolution&catid=45:recent-articles&Itemid=123

http://tarpley.net/2011/03/24/the-cia%E2%80%99s-libya-rebels-the-same-terrorists-who-killed-us-nato-troops-in-iraq/

....

Libyan Militants Leader, Another Graduate from Guantanamo Brainwashing Academy....

In typical lawyerly fashion, Obama offers a "defense" of his mission that explains nothing, but merely deflects the blame to someone else. He never once explains how training Egyptian, Libyan, Tunisian intellectuals and activists in the United States, to foment rebellion in their homelands and supporting terrorist groups who have killed American soldiers in both Iraq and in Afghanistan is "humanitarian." Every lying word he utters to the press is intended to mislead the American people and to promote a global war of aggression. The intellectual/activist from Chicago is a dictator who has not yet taken off the gloves....

The fact that EVERY militant "Islamist" group involved in the US terror war is being led by local terrorists, who have spent several years being broken and then reconditioned at either Guantanamo or Bagram, should not be taken lightly. Like I have been saying for a long time, the established pattern of American-supported terrorism in the Middle East/AfPak regional war front is proof of far greater crimes than the CIA bombing of the American homeland on 911. (I say "CIA bombing," because EVERY murderous act by CIA created "Al-Qaeda" terrorist groups, is an act committed on behalf of the agency.)

Every anti-Imperialist patriot, who currently devotes his or her efforts towards prosecuting the 911 conspirators, is spinning his wheels, looking for proof of crimes years after the fact, from evidence which has all been turned to dust, or melted-down for scrap. The real criminal conspiracy preceded that attack by several decades, extending all over the world, leaving bits and pieces of real evidence wherever the tentacles of the secret overlords has reached. The history of each reconditioned leader, like this al-Hasidi fellow, is part of our international tapestry of terror. Unraveling each thread is the path to exposing the grand design. This is our proof of exactly who, or what we are dealing with, sitting in the seats of power in Washington and London.

This Libyan Manchurian candidate, al-Hasidi has a well-known history that is spread-out too far for the Internet sweepers to eliminate...This is where we find the real evidence of fascist crimes against humanity. Obama's plan to take America's secret guerrilla armies out into the open and to embrace them publicly (more or less) proves to the world who he really is and exactly the type of "change" that he had in mind. It also exposes the secret network that connects the CIA/US military to "al-CIAda" and the sordid history of military efforts to assist the "al-Qaeda" penetration of multiple countries, moving huge quantities of men and materiel into each terror zone, usually under the cover of darkness. More and more often, the military operations take place under the cover of "private security" companies, composed mostly of both "retired" and active Special Forces and Delta Force soldiers.

The military is accustomed to lying to the public about everything that they are doing, under cover of "the greater good." The key to deniability has been solved by "contracting out" the work that is criminal or too dirty for the real military to be associated with to a network of secret private armies, composed of hardened military experts who are eager to kill, earning ten times the military's salary for the same murder. Working far beyond the scope of these private security companies, you find the terrorist outfits, like the ones now destroying Libya and Pakistan and a dozen other countries, run by brainwashed former "Islamists," who also earn enormous amounts of money, far beyond their wildest dreams, killing the Libyans, Pakistanis, Afghans, or whoever stands in the Empire's way.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html

The Bosnian rescue mission, to save the "Islamist" army (some elements of future "Al Qaida" among them) that had been thrown together by Bill Clinton and his cohorts to advance American foreign policy as he saw fit, in spite of Congressional opinion or U.N. resolutions (Resolution 713). The organization created for this purpose, Military Professional Resources Incorporated (MPRI), was a new variation of a previous subversive organization also constructed for the purpose of subverting the will of Congress in a war zone (Boland Amendment), which media personality Oliver North referred to mischievously as "The Enterprise."

Then, as now, American entities, composed of thousands of former and active intelligence and military services, supervised an international network (pipeline) of transportation and communication which facilitated the movement of "Islamic" militant armies and their arsenals, in a massive illegal operation, which operated beyond American and international law. This is "al-Qaida," ladies and gentlemen. Those crazy Arabs and Muslim terrorists behind the 911 attacks were trained by us and acted under American direction; they all do.

There would be no international "Islamist" terrorism if not for its American state sponsor....

http://www.srpska-mreza.com/Bosnia/Srebrenica/Tuzla-delivery.html

.....

March , 2011 -- More WikiLeaks selective releases of cables endanger other governments

We are following up on our March 24-25 report on how the selective release of US State Department cables from the US embassy in Jakarta was being used to damage President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono of majority Muslim Indonesia and even incite a revolution against him....

Assange said to be working for Mossad and CIA interests....

In what appears to be a concerted effort to create more political havoc in Muslim nations, we have now learned that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange passed cables sent by the then U.S. ambassador to Turkey, Eric Edelman, a notorious neocon and Israel supporter, to the Turkish newspaper Taraf in order to damage the election chances of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ruling Justice and Development (AK) Party. The leaked cables were then translated into Turkish and published by the newspaper. The cables mainly consisted of criticisms of the AK Party and Erdogan by Edelman, particularly of the AK Party's more independent foreign policy on the Middle East...

We have learned from knowledgeable Turkish sources that Turkish intelligence suspects that Assange has been working for some time for Israel's Mossad and the CIA in using selectively-leaked classified State Department cables, most of which contain information gleaned from diplomatic cocktail receptions and translations of local newspapers, to bring about rebellions against leaders of Muslim and Arab nations...

The WikiLeaks cable release operation, from the outset, targeted the government of a number of countries, but not Israel...

Interference in Turkish domestic politics by the United States and Israel has prompted severe criticism from a number of Turkish leaders. At a Turkish-American Friendship dinner held in midtown Manhattan on March 24, Mehmet Ali Sahin, speaker of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, said that a year ago, in March 2010, "groups in the U.S. were working against Turkey." Sahin was referring to the Israeli attack on the Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara, which was transporting aid to Gaza and was attacked by Israeli military forces in international waters. A Turkish-American citizen, Furkan Dogan, was killed in the attack. Neither President Obama or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ever called Dogan's family and offered condolences... The Israel Lobby, among the "groups" to whom Sahin was obviously referring, launched a vicious propaganda campaign against the organizers of the Gaza aid fleet -- largely through the auspices of the Israeli-influenced corporate media...

Sahin stated that "no country has the right to impose its policies on other countries," a remark that may also echo Turkey's thoughts on the current Western military attacks on Libya....

SURPRISE...Nameless American Officials Claim No “Al-CIAda” Fighters On Our Side....

SURPRISE! Nameless American Officials Claim No “Al-CIAda” Fighters On Our Side....


http://www.maskofzion.com/2011/03/libya-zionist-dragon-and-drums-of-war.html

Don't you folks know that 9/11 was a false flag orchestrated by criminal elements of the U.S. government and the Israeli Mossad with great assistance from ALL of the main stream media in the deception and cover-up, including CNN? Why can't you understand that it wasn't Muslims that attacked USA, that it was an 'inside job wall to wall....?' Doesn't that make your Islamophobia and mosque opposition a moot point?

The fact that a Deep State guy has spoken publicly about the possibility that the American-organized Libyan rebels might be "Al-Qaeda," is another indicator of how much effect we are having here in the Resistance Camp.... They are feeling the heat of our Truth, and they are starting to run scared. The Al-Qaeda/US Symbiosis has been revealed in Libya for all the discerning people of the world to see. Al-Qaeda is America's secret paramilitary army--always have been. Pretending that American support for bin Laden's gang is a thing of the past, will no longer wash. Too many people now realize just exactly what AQ really is--the CIA with beards...

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/03/23/israels-fingerprints-are-all-over-911-and-im-not-afraid-to-say-it/

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-libya-rebels-intel-20110324,0,5352122.story?track=rss

There was never any chance that Obama would back the end of nuclear power generation, no matter how many bones he might toss to the anti-nuclear movement. There is even less chance that Obama would ever try to turn the nation from the path of perpetual "persistent war." Throwing out this teaser now in the British press is another sign of growing desperation. Obama, like Clinton before him, is a good example of what the Democratic Party in the United States really wants--To kick the shit out of every smaller or weaker country that dares to say "No" to our demands to turn their backs on their Russian and Chinese friends, while finishing-off the American industrial base, in order to create their "globalist" nightmare.

Like in all American Hegelian politics, the public images projected by both the national Democrats, as well as the Republicans, is the exact opposite of the true nature of the party leaders. Democrats have always been warmongers just like the Republicans, the only difference is that the Republicans are proud militarists who revel in their warmongering, unlike the Democrats, who always hide behind a curtain of "humanitarianism," while pretending to be "peacemakers," whose only concern is the extending of the American/British Empire.

Consider this: The worst warmongers in the entire "war of terror" scheme have always been "neocons," most of whom were former Democrats or Marxists. Obama and Clinton were every bit neocons, just as much as Dick Cheney.

If enough international heat builds-up against the American/NATO aggression in Libya, then look for Obama to offer an olive branch to the Earth-first people, most of whom think that getting rid of nukes should take priority over putting an end to wars of aggression. Nuclear power has to be put way in the back of the vault, until we really understand nuclear science, but until that day finally arrives, we must first survive the nuclear disarmament process. There is no real disarmament process at this time, only more political theater. The real disarmament process will begin, when there is unity among nations for the purpose of eliminating the threats and international tensions which motivate nations to consider nuclear deterrence. Until there is a common desire to escape the nuclear nightmare, there should be no unity of purpose. Uniting behind the world aggression is the worst possible mistake real humanitarians could make.

There are two facts we are certain about: Politicians never tell the truth, unless the truth would work better than the lie. Obama would have never backslid on the nuclear power issue, unless he feared an avalanche of hostile reaction to his wars.

This trepidation shows that we are making our voices heard on some level. We must keep doing what we have been doing, working even harder to amplify the sound of our unified voices. In addition to this task, we must work on the weak arm of our growing resistance, the environmentalists, who will very likely bolt to Obama's side, if he plays the "anti-nuclear" card.

Beyond all of that, someone, perhaps the last moral leader, must force a vote at the UN on the anti-Libyan aggression.....

Germany has pulled out of NATO operations due to disagreements over the mission in Libya. To add to that, Germany did the unthinkable: it voted in favor of a UN Security Council resolution calling the Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory illegal and demanding the immediate halt of all settlement activity. Whoa.

Then, Ms Merkel did something very strange: she ordered the shutdown of Germany’s nuclear reactors.

Curiously, the Japanese, too, have now openly sided with the Palestinians — and they have now have serious problems with runaway nukes. Coincidence? Perhaps. But consider this: The same Israeli company providing ‘security’ to Japan’s reactors is the one that’s also responsible for the nukes in Germany. Reckon that had something to do with why Merkel hurriedly ordered the shut down of German reactors? What does she know? Was Israel’s Stuxnet virus responsible — intentionally or not — for the Japanese meltdown? Was it unleashed on the Japanese as a warning (albeit one that got out of control) not to mess with God’s chosen people? Is this what Merkel fears could happen in Germany?

Think that’s farfetched? Not when you consider that just yesterday, BOTH engines of Merkel’s immaculately maintained Puma chopper suffered simultaneous flameouts. Is Ms Merkel now suddenly waking up to the fact that the Israelis are stark raving mad and will stop at nothing to get what they want?

I’m inclined to believe Ms Merkel now takes very seriously the words of noted Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld when he openly boasted in an interview last year about Israel’s military capabilities, “We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”

And van Creveld isn’t exactly chopped liver — he’s lectured at the American Army War College. Replying to a question whether Israel does not have fears of being classified as a criminal state if it expelled Palestinians, van Creveld said, “Israel is a state that does not care about what others say about it and you must remember the saying of former defense minister Moshe Dayan when he said that ‘Israel must always act as a wild dog because it should be dangerous in the eyes of others, rather than be harmed.’” …

http://www.kyivpost.com/news/russia/detail/100701/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/23/nuclearpower-japan

http://www.germerica.net/nuclear-power-protests-Germany


....

Bandar to Zardari: "We need your help to meet the challenges in Bahrain....!"

"... Prince Bandar, who is the former secretary-general of the Saudi National Security Council and a former envoy of his country to Washington, is on a short visit to Pakistan.

Terming the visit significant, sources said: “He has come as a special emissary of King Abdullah.” The prince is scheduled to meet Chief of the Army Staff Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani today before returning home in the afternoon.

The sources said the visit by the son of Crown Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz is of great importance in the backdrop of the political disturbance in Bahrain. The possibility of the prince asking Pakistan for “meaningful help to meet challenges in its neighborhood cannot be ruled out,” the sources said. According to data obtained by The Express Tribune, there are 60,000 Pakistanis, mainly ex-servicemen, serving in that country’s defense and other security establishments..."

http://tribune.com.pk/story/137963/desecration-of-holy-quran-saudi-arabia-urges-restraint/

The Utterly corrupt and Dysfunctional Arab League should be disbanded

The Utterly corrupt and Dysfunctional Arab League should be disbanded immediately...

http://www.elnashra.com/articles-1-26485.html

I believe that the Arab League increased its budget by $61 million during its last meeting at Sirte/Libya last year... This means that the Arab league has an annual budget of around 3/4 of a billion US dollars.

I hereby humbly suggest that we dissolve the Arab League that has never disappointed in failing the masses and their aspirations. This league has been nothing short of an instrument of oppression, and a platform for dictators to speak to the world. These funds will be so much more effective if they were to be allocated to alleviate poverty , illiteracy and disease among the Arab masses.

In my view the Arab league has never accomplished anything meaningful but in light of its disastrous performance to stop the massacres in Libya and the daily use of force against peaceful demonstrators in Bahrain the League has lost all credibility.

What does anyone make of its latest position in Libya. After 42 bloody days of bombing, strafing and killing the protesters by the Qaddafi forces the Arab League decided to give a green light to the UN to establish a no fly zone but not to have any foreign interference. Can anyone explain this position? Of course not....

The US has already missed the boat on redeeming itself with the Arab Peoples.... and on many of these revolutions and is simply playing catch-up (Clinton and Gates before her....in the ME right now). The reality is their timidity or Israeli complicity to keep Gaddafi in power....on Libya stems from the fact that they really do not know what to do: “Gaddafi is a son-of-a-b*tch but we know him and he is cooperating fully since the 1970s...., who will come in his place if we help take him out?” That kind of despicable thinking.... Right now they are simply following the Europeans on this one and trying to salvage some credibility that is utterly non-existent....

Everyone is counting out the butchering clown Qaddafi way too early though.... No one really knows what the end game is, and I don’t think that Western powers are so quick to get rid of Qaddafi and simply hand Libya to an unknown entity yet called the “rebels,” the humanitarian issue notwithstanding. The Arab League’s blessings in this regard is also more of a hint that they were brought in spite of themselves. Does anyone believe that Saudi Arabia, or the UAE for instance, who frothed about the mouth against the Egyptian protesters up until the last second until Mubarak’s fate was sealed, and who now invade and suppresses the peaceful uprising of another Arab country, cares to have another blooming Arab democracy to contend with? This game, unfortunately, is not over....

The number of current US military involvements?

1) Iraq (full scale - one point)

2) Afghanistan (full scale - one point)

3) Pakistan (full scale - one point)

4) Libya (full scale - one point)

4) Yemen (covert & via KSA - half a point)

5) Iran (covert & via Israel - half a point)

6) Bahrain (covert - via KSA - half a point)

7) Kosovo (occupation - half a point)

8) Somalia (covert & via Ethiopia - half a point)

9) Palestine (covert & via Israel - half a point)

Total "war points": 1+1+1+1+.5+.5+.5+.5+.5+.5 = 7.0 wars

SEVEN SIMULTANEOUS WARS!!!

No empire, no matter how rich, can sustain such a military effort, much less so an already bankrupt empire like the USA and the 2 Jerks of Europe, the UK and France, both Bankrupt with a decrepit military....

Third, it is highly likely that the conflict with Qaddafi will be a long one. Either no side will prevail, or one will and the other will respond with a protracted guerrilla war. Can you guess what this will do to Libya's oil export capabilities? And then, can you guess what a further increase in the price of oil will do to the Russian (and Venezuelan!) economy?

So let us assume that the Kremlin decided that a UN military intervention would be a major mistake for the US Empire. Then, one of two things could have happened: Medvedev has capitulated to the Empire....

Variant #1: Medvedev and Putin have agreed to let Putin run in the next presidential elections. In that case, Medvedev has nothing to loose and a lot to gain ($$$) to let the UNSC resolution pass and then let Putin look noble, patriotic, principled and righteous.

Variant #2: (I like this one even more!) Putin quietly nudges Medvedev into approving the UNSC resolution thereby making him look like a spineless weakling and, as soon as the outrages takes-off in the Russian public opinion, Putin makes a widely reported statement making him look, well, noble, patriotic, principled and righteous (again).

In variant #2 Putin would kill to birds with one stone: damage the USA and damage his likely challenger Medvedev.

Please do not mistake any of the above as an expression of support or admiration for Putin. I believe that it is impossible to do something good by immoral means and Russia's abstention at the UNSC was definitely deeply immoral. But I also know that Putin is not exactly somebody over-burdened with issues of morality, ethics, or honor. In fact, I have always suspected that Putin and the folks backing him had left Eltsin bring Russia to the edge of total collapse only to make themselves appear like "patriotic saviors" once in power (just remember how long Russia had a "pretend war" in Chechnya before getting serious in 2000!).

The West bombs, the Arab League ducks

The Arab dictatorships - which once again have sanctioned an attack on a Muslim country - are scared to death of the backlash from their populations if civilian deaths in Libya from Odyssey Dawn balloon. Their astonishing dithering, and the African Union's outright hostility to the "coalition", explodes the myth that the "international community" is united.
- Pepe Escobar (Mar 23, '11)

At least in Beirut people can demonstrate peacefully without the fear of getting hit by tear gas and rubber bullets....

At least in Beirut people can demonstrate peacefully without the fear of getting hit by tear gas and rubber bullets......Unlike in Bahrain, Libya, Syria, Jordan, KSA, Kuwait, Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Morocco, Algeria, and Israel....

http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/926/its-official_in-2006-the-lebanese-government-was-hoping-israel-would-disarm-hezbollah-for-them


http://wiredlebanon.blogspot.com/2011/02/those-cia-tools-within-maronite-church.html

إلى قياات ١٤ آذار

March14th skunks managed to gather about 50 thousand PAID demonstrators this year....Pathetic fall from "grace"....

أنتم تُحيون ذكرى رفيق الحريري، الذي رفض كل الضغوط الخارجية التي مورست عليه إبان حكمه لثنيه عن دعم المقاومة، بل حماها وجلب لها كل دعم وشرعية، فاغتيل وجاؤوا من بعده بمن خضع لهذه الإملاءات. أمر مريب

أنتم جلبتم السلاح قبل السابع من أيار إلى أزقّة بيروت وأذكيتم النعرات المذهبية وغدرتم من الخلف بالمقاومة، وأردتم التضحية ببيروت وأهلها كي تكون ذريعة ضد سلاح المقاومة، فلو حرصتم على أرواح الناس لما سقط شهداء بسبب قراركم الظلامي في ٥ أيار.

قبلتم بوصاية السلاح وأنتم في السلطة ورفضتموها عند إخراجكم منها، فالذي يعيدكم إلى الحكم هو وصيّ عليكم أياً يكن: سوريا أو أميركا أو إسرائيل...

هل فرض السلاح عليكم السرقة والفساد؟ هل هدر المال العام ومصادرة أملاك الدولة حصلا خوفاً من السلاح؟

هل منعكم هذا السلاح من التعبير عن آرائكم وقيّد حريّاتكم؟

أنتم بكيتم وأسفتم في نفوسكم على سقوط الطغاة حلفائكم، بن علي ومبارك، وبدلاً من أن تصمتوا، ادّعيتم الانتصار للشعبين التونسي والمصري، لأنّ خيانة الحلفاء من شيمكم.

هل سلاح المقاومة في الجنوب لتحرير أراض لبنانية أم إيرانية محتلّة من إسرائيل؟

سقط السلاح، فما البديل؟ الجيش الذي طالما نكّلتم به ومنعتم عنه التسلّح؟ أم تتّكلون على أميركا في ردع إسرائيل؟

مشهد البارحة كان واضحاً. كل قياات ١٤ آذار المسيحية تأتمر بتيار المستقبل التابع بدوره إلى فيلتمان. ما شهدنا يوماً في تبعية كهذه، فمَن السيّد ومَن القاصر؟ وصاية ما بعدها وصاية.

وأين استقلالهم وسيادتهم وهم يرفعون صور الملوك الذين يحرمون التظاهر أصلا. كانوا ساكتين عن سلاج جزب الله عندما كان باستطاعتهم ابتزازه للسرقة واختلاس المال, أما اليوم فلا يستطيعوا بعد كف ايديهم

ليه بعد ينفع الحكي مع هؤلاء , تضييع وقت , صمّ بكم عمي فهم لا يفقهون , أهديناهم النصر فما بال هؤلاء انهم حقاً لا يعلمون شيء من معاني الحرية والكرامة شيئا, لم يعرفوا معنى التضحية في حياتهم و لا يلاموا

To the buffoons who call themselves the March14th gathering of stooges, lackeys and puppets of CIA/MOSSAD/DGSE/MI6/BND/CSIS/GID…..

Soufflés, it is said, do not rise twice…., the Lebanese Resistance of Hezbollah will prevail.

In politics, ideas are instrumental to the reproduction of power….but not such gibberish by Saatchi&Saatchi creeps.

Economic gain often prevails over moral principles in the international relations of the Middle East….and the World…

Western governments and academics are complicit in all of this charade for decades, giving the ‘butchers of Tripoli and Damascus’ plus others…..an undeserved respite….and they are still at it today….

The Arms of the Valiant, Nationalist Lebanese Resistance of Hezbollah.

The arms of the Resistance, it has been suggested, should be abandoned as a matter of principle. ‘From now on’, explains Caretaker Prime Minister Saad Hariri, ‘the possession of weapons, decision of war and peace, and defending the country should only be under the state’s control’. Political principles, it would seem, can be slippery. ‘From now on’? Perhaps this disclaimer is meant to ease the turnabout from the Hariri-Ministerial Cabinet Statement issued just over a year ago:

Based on the Cabinet’s responsibility to preserve Leba­non’s sovereignty, its independence, unity and the safety of its land, the government underscores Lebanon’s right through its people, army and resistance to liberate or regain authority of Shebaa Farms, Kfarshouba hills and the occupied part of Ghajar village and defend the country against any aggression.

For the sake of argument, however, let us set aside the dictates of political expediency. Let us look at the reality of what this stance entails.

The crux of the grievance being voiced these days is that the Lebanese Army should have exclusive domain over national defense. The grievance asserts that the Islamic Resistance of Hezbollah has usurped this privilege for its own advancement. The puzzling bit of this accusation, however, is that it is being raised not by the Army—but by various politicians.

In contrast to the opinions of the 14th of March personalities, the Lebanese Army has for over twenty-five years maintained an efficient working relationship with the Resistance. The developments in Lebanon over the past six years have left this harmony stronger than ever. Building on the firm, longstanding commitment exhibited by Generals Michel Aoun and Emile Lahoud, the Lebanese Army remains a proud partner of the Resistance.

When Lebanese Army General Michel Sleiman took on the role of President in 2008, he carried with him the experience to judge the elements required for an adequate national defense. He stated that the success of the Resistance in defeating the occupier was ‘achieved by virtue of the support granted by the Lebanese people, the State, and the Lebanese Army’. Such success notwithstanding, he continued,

the enemy’s persistence in threatening to violate our sovereignty imposes upon us to elaborate a defensive strategy that will safeguard the country concomitantly with a calm dialogue to benefit from the capacities of the Resistance in order to better serve this strategy. Accordingly, we will manage to avoid depreciating the achievements of the Resistance in internal conflicts and subsequently we will safeguard its values and national position.

President Sleiman reiterated his conviction just weeks ago in response to Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s warning that Israeli military may invade Lebanon yet again. Barak ‘knows full well’, said Sleiman, ‘ that entering Lebanon is no longer a walk in the park. The defense minister’s threat to send his forces into Lebanon again shows premeditated intentions of aggression. The Lebanese people, army and resistance are ready to respond to any such aggression.’

President Sleiman’s confidence in the existing defense framework is shared by the head of the Lebanese Army, General Jean Kahwagi. Addressing his troops last year, he advised them to ‘cling to the will of steadfastness and confrontation and to benefit from all the Lebanese capabilities residing in the capacities of the Army, the people and the Resistance as well as from the presence of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon and its support’.

Whereas the stance currently adopted by the 14th of March campaigners clearly resents the ability of the Resistance, General Kahwagi openly describes all contributions toward the national defense as honorable:

Let us look with veneration and respect at the souls of our pious martyrs, whether soldiers, citizens or resistance fighters, who fell while defending their country… and drew with their innocent blood the path of dignity and liberation for a country that we can be proud of in front of the whole world since we are its true and loyal protectors.

As the Israeli media grins at the banners being waved in Beirut that read ‘We want only the arms of the Lebanese army’, again it becomes imperative to look at the reality of what this stance entails.

The Lebanese Army remains committed to a cooperative national defense, to a formula of the Army, the people and the Resistance. Just days ago, General Kahwagi reiterated:

The Lebanese Army abides by this formula since it is part of the decisions and guidance of the political authority represented by the Cabinet and it is totally convinced by this formula since experience has proved its primary role in liberating the greater part of south Lebanon and western Bekaa from Israeli enemy occupation in addition to its role in defeating this enemy in the war of July 2006 and in safeguarding Lebanon in these days.

A system of mutual support has evolved. To disallow the arms of the Resistance would be to arbitrarily disregard the consistent evaluation of the Army’s top leaders. This is nonsensical. Such a suggestion would leave Lebanon vulnerable; of this there is no doubt. The only conclusion, then, is that such a suggestion is either gross negligence or willful acceptance of Lebanon’s being engulfed. We have to wonder whether the current swirl of rhetoric over who gets to be commander-of-the-day has more to do with protection or politics. If both the acting Army General and the President, a former Army General, embrace the contributions of the Resistance, then the state of Lebanon is already well in control of its defense.

Brenda Heard is the founder and director of Friends of Lebanon, London.

Saad Hariri’s father Rafik Hariri was a nationalist and he at least..."publicly" supported the Resistance’s right to keep arms until the Israel-Palestinian conflict is resolved – even if Israel return Shebaa Farms and Golan Heights. Saad, a Lebanon-Saudi dual citizen, on the other hand, is an opportunist and thus have no loyalty towards Lebanon. He used the Resistance for over 14 months to maintain his position as prime minister. Every word he uttered in Beirut, Tehran, Damascus and Ankara in support of Resistance against Israel – was clearly a lie.... And he would have been doing the same – had Hezbollah-led Opposition not toppled his government.

Saad CIA HARIRI is calling for disarming the Resistance to pave the way for Israel to re-occupy South Lebanon for water and oil reserves....

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/03/12/hizbullah-to-increase-military-power-to-scare-israel/

فرقة "ستريبتيز" تعرض عليه الانضمام....عاجل sms وعلى facebook: حزب الله يُسلّم السلاح خوفاً على "سوسو" من الإستمرار بخلع ثيابه

السيد نصرالله وبري يقرران تسليم السلاح بعد خلع الحريري كامل ملابسه

شكّل الإستعراض المقتبس من المنابر الأمريكية الذي أداه رئيس حزب "المستقبل" سعد الحريري في مهرجان 13 آذار أمس في ساحة الشهداء أمام مناصريه محطّ إستهزاء واسع في الشارع اللبناني، الذي إندفع على الفور الى التعليق عفويا على مشهد خلع الحريري سترته وربطة عنقه.

فقد كتب المخرج اللبناني شربل خليل تعليقا على هذه الواقعة، قال فيه: "لم تبد عفوية أبداً إطلالة رئيس حكومة تصريف الأعمال سعد الحريري في خطابه في ساحة الشهداء على هامش اليوم الآذاري الطويل ، وفيما بدا تنفيذاً لسيناريو مكتوب بدقة، لم يكد الحريري يصعد إلى المنبر حتى قال أنه سيخاطب الجماهير بـ" العامية" قبل أن يشرع بخلع الجاكيت، ومن ثمّ الكرافات، وصولاً إلى رفع أكمام القميص!"الشيخ سعد"، الذي لعب الدور بإتقان، لم يكد ينهي المقطع الأول حتى تابع رفع الأكمام قائلا بصوت عال "نشمّر عالمظبوط هلق".

كذلك علّقت صحيفة "السفير" في إفتتاحيتها على فعلة الحريري، فرأت أنه "ولولا المشهد المسرحي الذي أداه الأخير ببراعة لكان "المهرجان" ـ الذي بدا أقرب إلى "الكرنفال" - قد إفتقر إلى أي نكهة".

وقد ملأت صفحات "اليوتيوب" و"الفيسبوك" و"التويتر" ومواقع التواصل الاجتماعي على الانترنت تعليقات هائلة تسخر من "show " الذي قدّمه الحريري، الذي أبرز مدى تأثر الأخير بإطلالات الرئيس الامريكي باراك أوباما ونائبه جو بايدن، ما جعله يسير على الخطّ المرئي نفسه بدءا من الإعتماد على جهاز "teleprompter" لقراءة كلماته أمام الجمهور وتصوير نفسه خطيبيا إرتجاليا ماهرا، مرورا بطريقة مشيته على المسارح الخطابية وصولا الى تقليد المسؤولين الأمريكيين في تصرفاتهم التي تسعى الى إستقطاب إنتباه مناصريهم، وهي الحال مع الحريري مستعينا لذلك بفريق كبير من الاستشاريين والخبيرين في فن الخطابة والإلقاء .

وفي هذا الاطار، إنهمرت الرسائل النصية على الهواتف الخليوية بين المواطنين وعلى شبكات التواصل الاجتماعي ومنها "الفيس بوك" ، فكانت من أبرزها ما يلي :

- خبر عاجل: إنشقاقات في صفوف حزب الله وبدأت عملية تسليم السلاح بعد خطاب الحريري سوسو الوحش وخوفا" من أن يستمر في خلع ثيابه!

- بدك تنزع سلاح المقاومة؟ ما إلك إلا ترسل رسالة تكتب فيها "حلم" أو "دريم" على الرقم المرادف لبلدك..

- السيد نصر الله والرئيس بري يقرران بعد اجتماع طارئ تسليم كل السلاح قبل ان يستكمل سعد الحريري خلع كامل ملابسه في ساحة الشهداء

- بتشلح هون أو هونيك .... سلاحنا والله ما منعطيك!!

- يا عيب الشوم عليك يا سعد الحريري !

- ماذا لو أقيم مهرجان 14 آذار في آب اللهاب ؟.

- لو بتشلح لعشية ..... أفكاري هيّ هيّ !

- ظنّ كثيرون أن حزب الله سيعلن في بيان رسمي صادر عن علاقاته العامة أنه باشر تسليم السلاح!

- فرقة "ستريبتيز" الراقصة تعرض على الحريري الانضمام الى صفوفها: بعد إقالة سعد الحريري مبكرا من الحياة السياسية وجعله عاطلا عن العمل .. وبعد الأداء الناجح الذي أداه في مهرجان 13 أذار إنهالت عليه عروض العمل مع الفرق الراقصة وآخرها لفرقة ستريبتيز.

...

من خان أمانة المال والخير العامّين فأعمل فيهما نهبا وتنفيعات وصفقات مشينة؟

ومن منهم يحفظ لنا لبنان وكرامة لبنان؟ من منهم لم يتعامل مباشرة أو مداورة مع الخارج ضدّ أهله؟ يطأطئون الرأس كالولد المذنب امام اصغر موظّف في سفارة يستدعيهم ليرفّه عن نفسه. يستجدون المساعدات بإسم الشعب اللبناني ويحوّلونها مباشرة الى حسابات مستشاريهم حتّى عيل صبر الاتحاد الاوروبي وغيره من الهيئات المانحة من بلطجة ماليّة لم يروا لها مثيلا. حصّة تجهيزات الجيش اللبناني في الموازنة لا تتجاوز 1 في المئة من المساعدة الاميركية للجيش الاسرائيلي، بينما شركاتهم تنعم بمكرمات ضريبيّة لم يستفد منها أحد في العالم من قبل – هذا الذي على عينك يا تاجر، وأمّا المخفي فأعظم.
يتكلّمون عن انقلاب وهم من أدار ظهره لكلّ قانون وعرف ودستور خدمة لأسيادهم ولأوامر المهمّة التي تعطى لهم من كل حدب وصوب الاّ لبنان. وصلت بهم الوقاحة أن يزجروا وزير الداخليّة لأنّه تجرّأ وقال أن اصلاح القانون الانتخابي كان سيسمح لأهل بيروت بإبداء رأيهم في الانتخابات البلديّة، ثمّ يدّعون الغيرة على المؤسسات. وهذا ليس الاّ غيض من فيض.

مصيبتهم أنّهم مهما قالوا ومهما فعلوا فأنهم فقدوا ثقة المواطنين بهم. يقولون شيئا ويضمرون آخر. يفعلون شيئا ويخبئون آخر. فعلوا كلّ ما كان بوسعهم للتشبّث بالحكم وخصوصا بالمقدرات الماليّة. تعوّدوا على التحكّم بالناس ونراهم اليوم يتخبطون بحال جديدة لا قدرة لهم على تحمّل مسؤولياتها. الآن نفدت ذخيرتهم واصبحوا في المعارضة. شرط المعارضة الأول هو حدّ أدنى من الشفافيّة يفتقدونه تماما. وإذا كان ال strip tease هو مدخلهم الى هذه الشفافيّة، فإنّ بقاءهم فيها حتما حتما حتما طويل الأمد

....

نحن ، شعب لبنان، نريد زعماء كبار

يقف لبنــان عند مفترق. المرحلة مصيرية والبلد امام اخطار تهدد وجوده وكيانه... فألبلد يعيش في ظلَّ استحقاقات وانقسامات حادة لا سيما تلك المتعلقة بسلاح المقاومة والتحريض المتعنّت القائم عليه و قرب صدور القرارالمسيّس والجائر للمحكمة الدولية والوضع الوزاري. والخلافات، حول ألتوجهات والحلول التي يحتاجُ إليها الوطن، متناقضة حتى التصلّب.

لذلك,وفي هذا المناخ بالزات, نحن "شعب لبنان" أخذنا ألقرار بأن لا نقف مكتوفي الايدي بعد أليوم حيال هؤلاء الذين اثبتت التجارب على انهم ليسوا على مستوى المهمة ونطالب بزعماء متشبّثون في قناعاتهم أوفياء منصفون عادلون قادرون على أن يعيدوا بناء جمهوريتنا على دعائم جديدة من الإيمان بالوطن والثقة بالنفس . نحن أليوم ، شعبَ لبنان، نريد:

زعماء أبطال،
زعماء لهم رؤى دفاعية صادقة الأهداف، تأبى أن يستباح شبر واحد من الوطن "كل الوطن"،
زعماء يتوقدون بذاكرة وطنيّة، يحترمون المقاومين في سبيل الحريّة و الكرامة الوطنيّة، يفتخرون ويعتزّون بإنجازاتهم ويقدّرون تضحياتهم .
زعماء يدعمون و يؤيّدون السلاح الموجود في يد المقاومة الشريفة التي تحارب العدو الإسرائيلي الذي يعمل ليل نهار على إرساء مشروع التوطين من أجل إبعاد شبح عودة الفلسطينيين الى ديارهم.
زعماء يتوجّهون بروحٍ وطنية يحتذي به المواطنون، فيعمّمون إرساء المواطنية المثالية المنفتحة على الاخر وقبول الاخر بدل المواطنية القبلية أو الطائفية أو الحزبية المغلقة،
زعماء يتمتّعون بطاقة معنويّة عالية، يثقون بمعتقداتهم وقيمهم، ويعلنون حسّهم الواضح للأهداف،
زعماء يملكون الحكمة والرؤيا الصحيحة والوطنية ما يمكنهم من توجيه جهود شعبهم نحو نتائج تتخطى متناول يدهم الحالي،
زعماء لهم رؤى سياسية واجتماعية اقتصادية بعيدة الإشعاع،
زعماء يعون واجبهم في ضمان مساواة الجميع أمام القانون،

نحن ، شعب لبنان، نريد اليوم زعماء يوئمنون بأن الشعبيّة الفرديّة لا تجدي وزوالها سريع وأن كينونة وطننا بين ايديهم تعتمد على قدرتهم على أن يكونوا احرار شرفاء فيتخذوا قرارات كبيرة وحاسمة رغم الانتقادات أو خسارة النقاط السياسيّة... ولن نتوصّل إلى كل ذلك إلااذا قاموا وقمنا بتقديّم المصلحة العامة على مصالحنا الخاصة.

"... واذا كنا نحن ، شعب لبنان، نريد هذا الصنف من الزعماء، فلناخذ المبادرة ونلتزم التزاما تعنّتيا في جعل هذا ألخيار خيارنا وعندها لا بد ان يستجيب القدر"

Vers un Victoria-Gate ?

le cargo Victoria , appartient à une compagnie maritime française.

Le cargo Victoria, Call Sign: A8UJ5, IMO: 9290165, MMSI: 636091906, construit en 2004, transportant de l'armement destiné au Hamas, et naviguant sous pavillon du Liberia, appartient bien à une société française. Il s'agit de la CMA-CGM, 4, quai d'Arenc 13235 Marseille cedex 02 France.

Là où ça devient intéressant, c'est que la société CMA-CGM appartient à un libanais de Beyrouth du nom de Jacques Saadé, ce qui, en soi, ne serait pas particulièrement intéressant si le Liban n'était pas le centre du commerce du Levant....

Et cela ne serait pas non plus très intéressant en soi si Jacques Saadé, dont le cargo a transporté, selon les dernières estimations, environ cinquante tonnes d'armement , n'était pas un ami intime à la fois de Jacques Chirac et de l'ex premier ministre libanais Rafik Hariri.

Ceci ne serait pas non plus intéressant si Jacques Saadé ne s'était pas porté acquéreur de la société nationalisé CGM, en 1996, dans des conditions très douteuses, lors d'une transaction de privatisation bradée, et décidée par le chef du gouvernement de l'époque, un certain Alain Juppé, transaction dont l'opacité, le montage et les contours financiers avaient déclenché une information judiciaire, et ou Jacques Chirac et le cabinet d'Alain Juppé étaient mouillés jusqu'aux oreilles, on s'en souvient encore.

Et cela ne serait pas non plus intéressant si la CMA CGM du même Jacques Saadé ne s'était pas rapproché d'une compagnie turque, le groupe Yildirim...

Quoi qu'il en soit, il sera, je pense, très instructif de rechercher, des liens directs ou indirects existent ou pas entre, d'une part, les membres du conseil d'administration de la CMA CGM, Jacques Saadé, Rodolphe Saadé et Farid Salem, d'une part ; les membres du conseil du groupe Yildirim, le Président Ali Riza Yıldırım, le Directeur Général Robert Yüksel Yıldırım et le Vice-Président Mehmet Yıldırım, d'autre part ; les collaborateurs égyptiens de la CMA CGM Jihad Anis Dagher Directeur Général de la Ligne CMA CGM, Mostapha Mohamad Al Khalil Abed Al Menem, Directeur de la ligne CMA CGM, et Jamal Abdel Razek Abed As Sadek, Directeur financier de la Ligne Maritime CMA CGM ; et des "cadres" de la DGSE et de la CIA....

http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/shipdetails.aspx?mmsi=636091906

http://www.cma-cgm.fr/ProductsServices/ContainerShipping/VesselFleet/Navire_Victoria_9290165.aspx

http://www.cma-cgm.fr/default.aspx

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Saad%C3%A9

http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/actualite/societe/20010819.OBS7571/scandale-de-la-cgm-une-note-trahit-chirac.html

Libya, Qaddafi's atrocities, False Flag Attacks, what's next.....

Generational rage in the House of Saud --

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/0310/How-Qaddafi-is-blackmailing-oil-markets

Libya, Qaddafi's atrocities, False Flag Attacks, what's next.....

http://rt.com/news/libya-uprising-koussa-interview/


Following NATO's meeting today it appears that the organization is lukewarm about the idea of a military intervention in Libya, including a no-fly zone. The fact that the very same folks who illegally attacked Yugoslavia are now seriously speaking about the "need for legal sanction" is really rather disgusting, but it's good news anyway.

So what's next?

http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/news/bahrain-national-guard-to-recruit-former-soldiers-from-pak/605935.html

Well, a situation a la Afghanistan following the Soviet withdrawal is one possibility. Remember what happened then? The Najibullah regime managed to stay in power for another two years until the Taliban, the Northern Alliance and, mostly, the Pakistanis succeeded in re-taking Kabul (and promptly murdering him). The comparison should not be taken too far, of course as there are big differences between the two situations, but something similar could well be in the making if nobody intervenes.

Which brings me to my next point. Several media reports recently mentioned some huge gas storage facility (don't recall the name or location) which, if it exploded, would provoke a massive blast followed by an equally massive release of toxic gas resulting in many thousands of dead people.

Well, are you catching my drift?

In these "post-9/11" times when false flags are so successful, all it takes, at least according to the reports I have heard, one missile or round and the whole thing goes into the air? How hard do you think it would be for the USraeli Empire to deliver such a missile right on target? (That would be a *perfect* mission for a B-2 bomber, by the way...)

Would that not be a wonderful 'proof' that foreign military intervention is the "only way to stop this horrible massacre" and all the rest of the rhetoric we heard in Bosnia?

Another possibility would be a chemical attack on anti-regime forces which, of course, would be automatically and immediately blamed on Gaddafi without so much as a modicum of investigation?

Considering the huge wealth at stake, I would say that those who want a foreign military intervention and who "cannot" "afford" a situation like the one following the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan are very likely to try a false flag 'atrocity' to force NATO's hand.....http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/gaddafis-iron-fist-wont-help-him-keep-a-grip-on-a-divided-nation-2239775.html

When the going gets tough the tough get going?

The Pen Versus the Sword....

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/03/20113711235230215.html

The lack of American action in the Libya crisis will result in the defeat of the rebels, widespread executions and imprisonment. It will also consolidate the Qaddafi family's death grip on Libya for a long time. The excuse being given for this inaction is the "unknown" nature of the insurgents. Clinton suggested that if they depose Qaddafi they might create an anarchic situation that would lead to "another Somalia." This statement exactly parallels Qaddafi's internal and external propaganda. I will venture an opinion that this propaganda theme has been powerfully reinforced in messages from oil producing tyrannies that are in a position to punish the Obama Administration for any further encouragement of the downfall of autocratic regimes. We have "written off" the Libyan people and their revolt after we encouraged them and all the other peoples of the region to act in behalf of liberty, so much for the "freedom agenda."

No problemo though because by 2020 three decades later Kuwait will again be part of Iraq. The sands of time cover much of man's mischief. Even Libya will be forgotten shortly as the USA withdraws even more completely from the MED leaving it to the EU as its Mare Nostrum.

The USA does have bigger fish to fry now that most of Sub-Saharan Africa, all of South Asia and probably East Asia--Japan, Taiwan, Indonesia, etc. in play. So let's just ignore the Maghreb which is so unimportant to the US that our favorite dictators and military regimes are running things except for Tunisia of course. But hey then the Greeks settle there long ago and until Hannibal and Carthage defeated did a fair job of challenging the Romans. So let's not count Carthage, oh I mean Tunisia.
So let's add it all up. The US has abandoned so far the EU, the Western Hemisphere (Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela etc), North Africa, soon Afghanistan and Iraq, and yes the list of those areas and countries that no longer interest US grows longer....
And after all we did just welcome Moammar Qaddafi back into the realm of reasonable nations....LOL

C'est la tragedie! OBAMA's Rwanda/Bosnia is now Haiti/Libya!

Is the USA just waking up to foreign affairs....? we may yet see some wholly new candidates for President in 2012. Domestic issues now fronting for foreign policy issues.... After all Wall Street understands since it operates largely off shore.... And soon even the NY Stock Exchange will be under the German thumb. Is there a national security strategy other than turning USA into a third world commodity provider of extractive resources and food....?

For someone who I always thought was an extreme political animal able to schmooze his way through the Washington maze, Clapper has been surprisingly inarticulate lately. I never liked Clapper, but today I have to reluctantly leap to his defense.... China, Israel and Russia can deal USA a mortal blow. North Korea and Iran cannot. In that sense Clapper is right...Tempest in a teapot. Wordsmiths parsing what the meaning of "is" is....He's not stupid, he's not uninformed, he's just the designated flak dummy....in a MASSIVE Global chess Game with China.

He also said Qaddafi would prevail. If all that's deployed against Qaddafi are sharp words, he probably will prevail. It's not what we want (I think), but telling Qaddafi he must step down is not going to make it so... even if we threaten to hold our breath until he does...but. clearly Israel would like Gaddafi to stay and is doing everything it can to help Gaddafi.....cleaning up that mess would match the trials of Hercules. Though hopefully when re-routing the Potomac to clean things up we'll make certain to fit K street in as well.... what does that say about the Iran NIE, that is said to be "complete" and allegedly walks back some basic premises of the 2007 NIE?

Having said all that, the DNI should be able to clearly and intelligently state the facts as the IC sees them and defend those statements with clear logic, deftness and eloquence. Clapper has not done that. I hope he hasn't spent too much effort decorating his office.

We should all now be hyper-critical of any report of atrocities coming out Libya....even if it's not excluded that the crazy Gaddafi will do such things...and he has done it already now and in the past in Chad....

The great thing about “al-Qaeda” is that they are the terrorist group that has something to offer for anyone who needs a patsy to fulfill a task, whether that be to cover a political assassination of an annoying individual, a military incursion into an innocent country, the suppression of national civil rights, or even the use of martial law tactics against unarmed citizens…., in USA with the criminal Patriot Act….and it’s being replicated the World Over….

http://rt.com/news/libya-uprising-koussa-interview/


..

The Shia-Sunni battle for oil....

http://www.pbs.org/nbr/site/onair/transcripts/nbr_transcripts_110310/

Saudi Wahhabi thuggish forces have used stun grenades and rubber bullets to disperse the hundreds peaceful Shia protesters demanding release of prisoners in Qatif, wounded more than four demonstrators and it is said that one martyred.


According to eyewitnesses more than 4000 peaceful protesters raised the Saudi flags and then police began shooting towards the demonstrators, wounded at least four demonstrators and one person martyred.

In response to firing demonstrators chanted "peaceful peaceful ..".


Witnesses said that hundreds of protesters, including women holding Roses in their hands, took to the streets on Thursday. As the rally was about to finish, police opened fire on them, injuring at least four of them, all Shias. They were later taken to Qatif general hospital, witnesses said.

Oil kingpin Saudi Arabia braced Friday for protests calling for political and economic reforms a day after witnesses said police shot and wounded three Shia demonstrators.
Online activists using the Facebook and Twitter have called for a "Day of Rage" and a "Saudi March 11 revolution" demanding a fully elected parliament and ruler in this conservative Islamic monarchy.

Security was strongly beefed up in the capital Riyadh in the early hours of Friday, after the interior ministry issued a stern reminder any kind of protest was illegal and unrest would not be tolerated.

Tensions rose late Thursday when security forces shot and wounded three Shia protesters in the city of Al-Qateef in Eastern Province, according to witnesses.

A royal official said Friday police responded to shooting from a man in the crowd, who was wounded by return fire and remains in custody. He did not confirm if any other people were injured.

The demonstrators were calling for the release of nine Shia prisoners who have been in jail for 14 years without trial, a witness told .....

Saudi Arabia, with about a quarter of the world's oil reserves, is a lynchpin of security in the Middle East and signs of unrest in the kingdom are being nervously monitored by the United States and other major powers.

Responding to Thursday's incident, the United States said it was keeping an eye on the situation and restated its support for universal values of human rights.

The Human Rights First Society of Saudi Arabia strongly condemned the police shootings in Eastern Province, which has the biggest concentration of Shia of any part of the mainly Sunni Muslim country.

"HRFS condemns, with the loudest and clearest words, the use of all kinds of force to disperse demonstrators, particularly when live ammunition was used last night against the demonstrators in Qatif," it said in a statement.

So far Saudi Arabia has been spared the political tumult that has gripped neighbouring countries like Yemen and swept the autocratic leaders of Egypt and Tunisia from power.

The kingdom's top clerics have also condemned as un-Islamic calls for demonstrations and petitions, saying "reform and advice do not take place through demonstrations and methods that fan sedition."

Dozens of police cars filled the strategic Olaya commercial centre in the Riyadh, which was hit by a blinding dust storm overnight, where the protesters are supposed to congregate.

Police patrols stood guard on the sides of the main roads of King Fahad and Olaya main street where security forces set up a checkpoint and were asking motorists for their identification.

Harnessing the power of new media like Facebook to spread their message, activists have urged Saudis to demonstrate in large numbers soon after the Friday prayers around 1000 GMT.

Protests have been called in most cities including Riyadh, Jeddah in the west and Dammam in the oil-rich east.

Activists are demanding far-reaching reform including representative government, an independent judiciary, the abolition of the secret police, the release of all political prisoners and guarantees of freedom of expression.

On the economic front, they seek a minimum monthly wage of 10,000 riyals ($2,667) and jobs for Saudis, in a country where the unemployment rate is 10.5 percent and soars to around 30 percent in the 20-29 age group.

The Gulf Civil Society Forum, a liberal pan-Gulf group, expected a low turnout because the call came from London-based dissidents who do not have a large following in the kingdom.

Other Facebook activists have called for nationwide protests on March 20.

On his return from surgery in the United States last month, King Abdullah decreed benefits estimated at more than $30 billion such as housing services and unemployment payments.

Crude prices turned lower in Asia on Friday as traders awaited further news on protests in Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, analysts said.
New York's main contract, light sweet crude for April delivery, fell 97 cents to $101.73 per barrel in the afternoon.

Brent North Sea crude for April dipped 39 cents to $115.04.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/~/NewsContent/2/8/7443/World/Region/Saudi-braces-for-protests-amid-sweeping-Arab-unres.aspx

http://swaminomics.org/?p=340

Some conspiracy theorists will have you believe that everything in the Middle East is about oil, including the US invasion of Iraq. But the fact is that, three years after the invasion, the Americans have not acquired any Iraqi oilfield.
Yet in one sense the hundreds of weekly killings in Iraq are indeed about oil. This relates not to the US occupation but the Sunni-Shia struggle for controlling oil.

Iraq’s population consists roughly of 60% Shia Arabs, 20% Kurds and 12% Sunni Arabs (the balance being small minorities). Iraq has for centuries been ruled by Sunnis. Democracy has now empowered the Shia majority, and Sunnis fear the consequences.The biggest oilfields in the country are in the Shia south, and the rest are in the northern Kurdish region. There is no oil in the Sunni triangle in the middle of the country. The new Constitution of Iraq was long delayed because of heated debates on sharing oil revenue. One Constitutional provision says that oil belongs to the people of Iraq in all regions. Yet the Constitution also gives autonomy to the three regions—Shia, Sunni and Kurd. This fuels Sunni fears that the other two regions will ultimately hog all the oil.

You cannot attribute the murderous battles between Sunni and Shia militia to oil alone. The strife is also caused by religious and regional tensions, the Baathist backlash, and the belief of some Sunnis that the Shia-Kurd majority is an American poodle. Yet overlying all these causes is tension over oil.

The tension is not limited to Iraq: it pervades the whole Gulf. Muslims in the region oppose the US occupation, yet all Arab governments desperately want US troops to stay on. Why? Because they fear that US withdrawal will encourage Iran to foment Shia insurrections in every Sunni-ruled state in the Gulf. The Shia population is substantial and sometimes dominant along the Gulf shoreline.

The entire shoreline was part of the Persian Sassanid Empire in the 7th century. That is why the body of water was called the Persian Gulf. The Sassanid Empire was Zoroastrian. Soon after, Arab Islam swept through the Middle East. But it split along Shia-Sunni lines. The Shias dominated Iran, Iraq and some other parts of the Gulf shoreline. The Sunnis controlled most other regions, including the holy cities of Mecca and Medina.

The Middle East was ruled by the Ottoman Empire from the 13th century onwards. The Empire collapsed after World War I, and the British ushered in the rule of assorted Sunni kings and sheikhs.

Oil transformed the region. Saudi Arabia discovered the biggest oilfields in the world. But 70% of its oil lay in the Shia-majority region on the Gulf shore. This made the Saudi royal family paranoid about the possibility that these Shias, abetted by Iran (and now Iraq), would secede and take the oilfields with them.

Baqir Solagh, former Interior Minister and now Finance Minister of Iraq, last year accused Saudi Arabia of violating the civil rights of Shias in its eastern region, and called for justice. This caused consternation in Riyadh. Shortly after, the Minister’s brother was kidnapped, and he attributed this to Saudi revenge. Whether true or not, it highlighted how high Sunni-Shia tensions run over oil.

Events in Lebanon have further worried the Saudis. Hezbollah, the Shia party of Lebanon, has gained de facto control of the southern part of the country. It has been armed by Iran and is too powerful for the Lebanese government to disarm. Hezbollah battled Israel in July and August and was widely seen to have won, simply because it was the first time that Israeli forces failed to win. Hezbollah’s rockets killed over 100 Israelis, and it claims to have 20,000 rockets still in reserve.

Hezbollah has become and will continue to be a hero to Muslims throughout the Middle East, even Sunnis. This makes Sunni rulers uneasy. The have long relied on Sunni-Shia antagonism to keep Iranian machinations at bay. But if Iran and Hezbollah attain heroic status among all Muslims in the Gulf, Sunni rulers fear loss of authority, and maybe of their oilfields too.

Many geologists feel that global oil production is close to a historical peak, after which it will decline and send prices spiraling. But one American academic, Amy Jaffe of the Baker Institute, theorises that Saudi Arabia may seek to discomfit Iran by sharply increasing oil production to deliberately cause a price crash. Saudi Arabia has a huge trade surplus and can shrug off a lower oil price. But a low oil price will convert Iran’s trade surplus into a deficit, creating problems for a country already facing international financial and banking curbs.

I personally doubt that Saudi paranoia about Iran will go to this extreme. But the very fact that academics are speculating on the impact of Shia-Sunni tensions on oil shows that the future of oil prices will be decided by geopolitics no less than geology....

"Fight and decisively win in multiple, simultaneous theater wars".

The history of US imperialism should be understood. The 2000 Report of the Project of the New American Century entitled "Rebuilding Americas' Defenses" calls for the implementation of a long war, a war of conquest. One of the main components of this military agenda is: to "Fight and decisively win in multiple, simultaneous theater wars"....

The "Demonization" of Muslims and the Battle for Oil,

Part I Insurrection and Military Intervention: The US NATO Attempted Coup d'Etat in Libya?

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23605

L'agent sefarade de la DGSE Al Qaddafi sait aussi que Sarkozy est directement impliqué dans l'assassinat de Rafik Hariri car celui-ci avait aidé Chirac..., Lagardere et autres a detourné les retro-commissions des contrats Agosta et Sawari 2 sur des comptes au Moyen Orient et en Asie.... Il semble que nous ne sommes plus les seuls a pouvoir pulveriser la ripoublique jacobino talmudo sioniste france-maconnique et ses elites racistes, genocidaires avant le debut de l'été! Il n'y aura pas d'elections en 2012.... la revolution, la vraie est la ! France-Israel rend ton passeport et ta carte d'identité et DEGAGE A TEL AVIV ! ICI C'EST CHEZ NOUS !
Le fou malfaisant Sarkozy va-t-il entraîner la France dans une nouvelle guerre en Afrique du Nord pour faire taire un témoin gênant, qui aurait aide a financer la campagne Sarkozy de 2007....? Voilà qui arrangerait bien ses commanditaires Américains et Israéliens.... Quant aux veaux....

The US no longer constructs its own foreign policy....

The US no longer constructs its own foreign policy but only reflects that of various foreign agents and nations that win the lobbying battle--meaning in the end campaign contributions which are in fact illegal from foreigners in Presidential campaigns. Numerous efforts to buy the Presidency of the US have occurred but the closest victory was by the NAZI regime in 1940. An untold story....
If Lindbergh had political savvy and been on the ticket in 1940 who knows? America First sounds good until you study the following they had in the American polity. And it almost worked. The NAZI's came alarming close to total domination in 1940-1941. Fortunately they did not. I argue FDR helped but in reality the survival of Britain was largely luck not skill. And high octane petrol from the US....

J Street is just a front to provide cover for what is coming....

http://www.thejerusalemfund.org/ht/display/ContentDetails/i/10418

Never, "We Jews have a problem; we need to correct the behavior of our fellow Jews."

That's quite in line with the way that Jews related to host governments where they resided, especially Jews in Poland. There, Jews enjoyed a prosperous "state within a state" (that served as the model for the way Jews tried to live -- and control -- Germany). The larger point is that Jews were in Poland under the protective wing of the monarchy. If a Jew or the Jewish community had a problem with the 'locals' or other relationships, their automatic response was to go to the king with the expectation that the king would make it right.

Ruderman says that the Jewish community started to show stresses with "modernity" -- or "emancipation" -- when Europeans, as well as Jews, gained democratic rights. Democracies were not as sympathetic to Jewish presence or activities as were the former monarchs, who were in a mutually beneficial financial relationship with Jews, while the democratic masses were not.

Report on the Israeli mercenaries fueling a civil war in Libya:
http://www.voltairenet.org/article168770.html

Zionism, liberal or not, is a cult.

But if anyone wants to understand the true extent of the sickness of the Zionist they can read this.

http://www.jerusalemsummit.org/eng/hs_short_eng.htm

The org, with American members, is most intent on removing the Palestine's. Such US politicians as Sam Brownback are members.

Their 'plan' for Palestine is a mix of Orwell and Nazi racist mentality.
Truly, this plan, presented as "humanitarian solution" is so bizarre and transparent that it's frightening to know that these people are so stupid as to think anyone reading it wouldn't immediately make the Nazi 'master race" comparison.....

"As a corporation that does not have tax-exempt status, Ben-Ami noted, J Street was under no obligation to reveal its donors..."
http://jta.org/news/article/2010/09/26/2741032/j-street-owns-up-to-soros-funding

Many years ago, "liberal" Louis Brandeis told a late friend of mine: "There are two sides to every coin, except Zionism." Brandeis' links to international Zionism and to the UK are worth close examination....

"Nazi racist mentality" --

In fact, Arthur Ruppin, who "produced" the "modern Hebrew culture" that defines Israel and Zionism today, enacted eugenic, racist policies.
Etan Bloom at Tel Aviv Univ. researched Arthur Ruppin quite thoroughly; here's a snippet of his study on Ruppin's eugenics plans. Note that Ruppin selected OUT Arabs; Sephardic, Orthodox Ashkenazi, and 'Oriental' --Arab and Iranian' Jews as disgusting and undesirable, and selected FOR use in the Zionist project East European Jews. http://c-spantalkback.blogspot.com/2011/03/arthur-ruppin-and-nazi-eugenics-as.html

Note also that Bloom writes that Ruppin, alone, was successful in that Darwinian, eugenic model for creation of the 'new Jew.'

Cal, Germans did not have nearly as thorough a racist agenda as Zionists in Israel DID; that you and almost everyone else believes in German racism is a tribute to Zionist propaganda.

When Zionist propaganda is peeled off of the facts of Jewish history, some serious fi*t is going to hit the fan. Etan Bloom's dissertation is one such effort; Israel Shahak also contributed to 'trutherism' about Jewish history....

http://twelfthbough.blogspot.com/2011/03/virtually-unknown-in-west-libyas-water.html


.

http://www.crudeoilpeak.com/

http://www.theodora.com/pipelines/north_africa_pipelines_map.jpg

http://www.deplc.com/projects/the-fawar-permit

http://www.crudeoilpeak.com/wp-content/gallery/libya/north_africa_middle_east_main_exporters_1986_2009.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/16/Arab_World-Large.PNG

.

QUELS SONT LES LIENS QUI UNISSENT RAFIK HARIRI, SARKOZY, CHIRAC, LA SYRIE, LE QATAR, AL QADDAFI, LA CAMPAGNE ELECTORALE DE 2007, LES INFIRMIERES BULGARES, L'AFFAIRE CLEARSTREAM, LES RETRO-COMMISSIONS DES CONTRATS AGOSTA ET SAWARI 2 ET L'ASSASSINAT DES 11 INGENIEURS FRANCAIS A KARACHI EN 2002 ?


MISE A JOUR SAMEDI 12 FEVRIER 2011 : INTENSE PRESSION DES JUIFISTES DE L'ELYSEE SUR LES SYRIENS....LOL, POUR QU'IL RETIRE SA PAGE EN ARABE. LA TRADUCTION EST DISPONIBLE SUR CE BLOG ET SUR LE NET, Y A JUSTE A LA TRADUIRE EN FRANCAIS ET LA FAIRE TOURNER AFIN QU'ILS SE PENDENT D'EUX-MEMES. SARKOZY TU FAIS TON ALIYAH IMMEDIATEMENT ! EN FRANCE, EN EUROPE T'ES CHEZ NOUS L'ISRAELIEN! TU DEGAGES MAINTENANT ET PAS EN 2012 ! J'AI ETE INFORMÉ DU FAIT QUE LES JUIFISTES DE L'ELYSEE ONT DEMANDE A L'ARMEE DES JUIFISTES HARKIS ALGERIENS DE PARTICIPER AUX BOMBARDEMENTS SUR LA LIBYE, CE QUI ENTRAINERA DE FACTO LA CHUTE DES HARKAS. LE PETROLE LIBYEN APPARTIENT AU PEUPLE LIBYEN, MEME CHOSE EN ALGERIE. LA CHUTE DE AL QADDAFI ENTRAINE AUTOMATIQUEMENT CELLE DES JUIFISTES AU MAROC, ALGERIE ET A PARIS... L'EFFET DOMINO. DES SOURCES MUSULMANES AURAIENT PRIS CONTACT AVEC PLUSIEURS JUGES FRANCAIS ACTIFS ET A LA RETRAITE, ENNEMIS DE LA FRANCE-MACONNERIE, POUR PREPARER L'EVICTION, APPAREMENT DANS LA VIOLENCE, DES ISRAELIENS DE FRANCE....

Le Qatar avait versé 485 millions de dollars a Al Qaddafi pour que celui-ci relache les infirmieres bulgares... Or, les juges Van Ruymbeke et Trevidic devraient jetter un oeil sur la provenance de cet argent, 'récupéré' apres la mort de Rafik Hariri en 2005 puis blanchi en parti dans l'operation des infirmieres Bulgares. Combien Ashkenazi et Olmert ont prelevé sur les centaines de millions des retro-commissions des contrats Agosta et Sawari 2 pour abattre Hariri ? Argent blanchi en parti par Al Qaeddafi et ayant servi a financer une partie de la campagne de 2007 du mossadnik Sarkozy.

Mais d'ou vient cet argent que les qataris ont versé a la racaille juifiste d'Al Qaddafi dans le cadre de l'operation de liberation des infirmieres bulgares? Ne serait-ce pas l'argent detourné par Hariri au profit de Chirac et ses équipes, une bonne partie de l'argent des retro-commissions des contrats Agosta et Sawari 2. Argent 'récupéré' apres la liquidation de Rafik Hariri par Asef Shawkat et l'odieuse White House Murder INC, en soutaritance pour le CIA/MOSSAD....., puis en partie blanchi par l'agent sefarade de la DGSE, Al Qaddafi. D'ou l'affaire clearstream et les manipulations de la .... DGSE

Guéant, Guaino, Copevici, Sarkozy petites racailles nazillones juifistes de Tel Aviv, ou allez vous mettre vos grandes gueules d'israeliens ?! C'est la fin du LIKUDMP... la fin de la France-Israel... En esperant maintenant que le CRIF et le mossad declenchent des attentats sanglants en France pour sauver le 'titanic LIKUDMP' en total perdition.

Sarkozy tu fais pas le poids, tu arretes maintenant, ou tu es responsable de ce qui suit, la guerre civile. Il y a que ta sale engeance de sionistes pour tirer sur les ambulances...

Juste pour etre sur que Al Qaeddafi ne sabote pas notre agenda, le positionnement des le depart est crucial pour ce qui suit.


La cinquieme republique sioniste du CRIF est belle et bien finie...

Quel spectacle, entretuez-vous racailles sionistes ! La suite ci-dessous, ce sont les syriens qui regalent! Ils ont tout compris !

Financement de la campagne de 2007 de Sarkozy avec des fonds blanchis par Al Qaeddafi et le Qatar, les Emirats:

The following is a rough Google translation.....LOL

French source reveals the "truth" the secret grave talked about the Libyan regime and stressed that he will waste Sarkozy....

Gaddafi financed the election campaign of Sarkozy and his party millions of dollars in the same way which was financed by Hariri and Saddam Hussein, the election campaigns of his predecessor, Jacques Chirac, and the intermediaries Vbannaon, Italians, Zionists!?

Paris, the truth (especially of: Ellen / Susan Bourgeois): detection Arab source in the party of the "Union for a Popular Movement," the French, a party that belongs to President Nicolas Sarkozy, the nature of the "secret grave," which threatened the Qaddafi regime to disclose it in retaliation for the recognition of France National Council of Libyan opposition. The news agency "Jana" the Libyan official said today (yesterday) Thursday, "it was" aware that there is a secret grave will inevitably lead to the fall of Sarkozy or until his trial, relating to the financing of his campaign the previous year 2007. "And issued this statement after the recognition of France's National Assembly, the Transitional Libi as a "sole legitimate representative of the Libyan people" and declared that it would send an ambassador soon to Benghazi . But Jana did not reveal the nature of this "secret".
Kadhafi and Sarkozy: Anas session....

Insistence Arab party, Sarkozy revealed the "truth" that the matter of millions of dollars (more than fifty million dollars) to pay the Libyan regime to finance the campaign of Sarkozy's presidential election during the first and second rounds in May of 2007, which won wrapped against the party's candidate Socialist Segolene Royal, where he received about 53 percent of the votes, while Royal won about 48 percent. The source revealed that the funds "have been delivered in liquid form (cash) in the bags and not in the form of money orders or checks, so as to prevent seizure in any future investigation of Mali." The source said the businessman of Lebanese origin Zeyad Taqi al-Din, and closely related to Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, and others from Italy and Libya itself, took delivery of these bags for close to Sarkozy, has played a family of his wife, Carla/CIA/DIA...., Italian, play a pivotal role in the process as there was a relationship between and the "lobby" the Libyan regime in Italy. The source added that the Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi, "he was aware of the process, and perhaps provided logistic facilities in this area, particularly with respect to payments that have been delivered and received on the Italian territory." But the surprise in revealing the source is that the French journalist (called the "philosopher") Bernard-Henri Levy, known for its relations with the Mossad and the CIA and the Israeli Likud Party, is also playing a role in the process of transferring funds. It is known that Levy led covert operations in support of fundamentalist terrorist organizations in Afghanistan under the pretext of liberation from Soviet occupation. Where he oversaw the installation and management of radio stations and training Ialamiyeta in "the art of propaganda against communism." And today it became known widely in the West to Levy, and other French intellectuals, took to do this work under the supervision of the CIA funding and the participation of Saudi intelligence....and MOSSAD.

Arab source in Sarkozy's party told the "truth" that part of the "secret" to which I alluded Libyan News Agency, also relates to commissions Tkadaha Sarkozy and his team the summer of 2009 by Seif al-Islam Gaddafi, in the context of the sale of military aircraft of a French model, "Rafal" of modern Libya, as well as the Mirage of the fourth generation.

In a related development, the source said that the way in which the funding process Libyan Sarkozy match exactly with the way it was carried out by Saddam Hussein and Rafik Hariri, along with Jacques Chirac (by any bags, and not by check).
In this connection, that the French intelligence had raided the house of journalist Syrian opposition Nayouf in the suburb of Malakoff, near Paris, in January 2004 in a manner Amoavlp, fraud and stolen three compact discs (CD-ROM) contains documents relating to the process of financing Saddam Hussein and Rafik al-Hariri to Jacques Chirac. According to the report of the newspaper "Le Parisien" French , the French intelligence called Nayyouf to its headquarters in the old area "Bear Wise" in Paris to discuss it in the newspaper report was written in "Corporation" Before, in which he disclosed that French intelligence was involved in the process of neighborhood "Uzbek" terrorist attacks in Damascus in 1981 through the recruitment of Muslim Brotherhood/CIA members who were engaged in an armed struggle against the Syrian regime under the auspices of the Iraqi and Jordanian intelligence. He went hundreds of dead and wounded in the terrorist operation. At the time of Nayyouf in the "hospitality" at the intelligence in the "Bear Wise", the elements of the device in question to enter his home by a copy of the matching key held by the Municipality of Malakoff, as the entity that rented the house. And later, revealed his lawyer William Bourdon that Nayyouf got the documents (Confessions of audio and documents written) of the diplomat of the former Iraqi Mahdi Habib, who was carrying money bags to Jacques Chirac, before the split on Saddam's regime at a later time. Because of the mentioned documents, and other similar things concerning the involvement of French intelligence in the bombing of a neighborhood Uzbek referred to, and in providing the Syrian regime to biological materials and chemicals have been tested secret to hundreds of political prisoners, the Syrians and Lebanese by the French Defense Ministry in Guantanamo, "Khan Abu Shami" secret in the Syrian desert , which was unveiled in 2002, the French authorities turned his life into hell, which forced him to leave France to the final European country to another.

It's just a fraction of the head of an iceberg of corruption in France's official support for terrorism in the Arab world. It will not be a surprise to us when it is said one day that French experts run the war of genocide managed by the Gaddafi regime against its own people, even if Sarkozy has withdrawn its recognition of the Libyan regime today. This is how acrobatic movements, often intended to make waves in a corner to hide the crimes being committed in another angle...., exactly like the Syrian Alawite Dictatorial Mafia in Damascus for Decades...!?

BAE, Al-Yamama, KSA and Labor in the UK....an explosive combination...

A senior MP has demanded a parliamentary inquiry into Britain’s £43 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia after a leaked US diplomatic cable disclosed the full case against BAE Systems, the defence contractor.

The Serious Fraud Office dropped the investigation in December 2006, after intense diplomatic pressure from the Saudis. BAE was fined by US authorities last year after it admitted a relatively minor charge of making false statements. It faced no action in Britain over the Saudi allegations and until now the full details of the case have been kept secret.

However, a US cable given to the WikiLeaks website and obtained by The Daily Telegraph discloses the strength of the investigators’ case. Written four months after the collapse of the investigation, it shows the SFO had evidence that:

Read more ....


How a tiny kingdom strong-armed the US
The bullet that killed a pro-democracy protester in Bahrain last month was probably paid for by American taxpayers. Just how US bullets make their way into guns used by the tiny country's troops opens a window on the Pentagon's relationships with autocratic Arab states that have recently proven more powerful than American ideals and the United States president. - Nick Turse (Mar 16, '11)


Update: WikiLeaks cable alleges fraud in arms deal -- UPI

Update: Through the keyhole of Gaddafi's summer palace --

http://english.aljazeera.net/video/africa/2011/02/20112276522858202.html

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/03/11/us-spies-after-the-cold-war