England’s Jewish Aristocracy

Did you know that Simon Cowell, the acerbic judge on American Idol, is half-Jewish?

British Jews keep a low profile but they are extremely influential. Just take a glance at this Jewish Hall of Fame. Similarly, it is hardly known that the British aristocracy largely is half-Jewish too, and that, in the words of L.G. Pine, Editor of Burke’s Peerage, “the Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual.” (219)

This is confirmed by British social critic Hilaire Belloc who described the British Empire as a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy.

“After Waterloo [1815] London became the money market and the clearing house of the world. The interests of the Jew as a financial dealer and the interests of this great commercial polity approximated more and more. One may say that by the last third of the nineteenth century, they had become virtually identical.” (“The Jews” 1922)

In the next few articles, I am going to explore the thesis that the British Empire was a Masonic proxy, and that British & American imperialism derived its moxie from the perverse desire of Cabalist bankers to own and control everything. The bankers (i.e. the “Crown”) colonized England & the US as well as the world. The “Jewish Conspiracy” was the British Empire now repackaged as the New World Order. Of course, now it encompasses everyone with a stake in “globalism.”

Before I commence this heavy lifting, it being the weekend, I want to regale you with Pine’s amusing account of “Jewish infiltration into the aristocracy.” ( “The Anglo Jewish Peerage” in “Tales of the British Aristocracy” 1956, pp.217-223.)

Pine is outspoken in a way few people are today. He says that for every Rothschild or Disraeli, there were “10 cases of Jewish connection which are now forgotten. The reason is that in many cases “Jewish origin is concealed.” (218)

The marriage of Jewish finance and British aristocracy took place literally. Spendthrift gentry married the daughters of rich Jews.

Pine scorns the British aristocracy: “A man is not usually thought the more of, because he has married a woman for her money…An ancient estate is likely to be sold unless some large sums are found. The sums are found from marriage with a Jewish heiress…”

An outstanding example is the marriage of the 5th Earl of Roseberry who married the only daughter and heiress of Baron Mayer de Rothschild and later became Prime Minister. “She stayed in the Jewish religion but her children were educated as Christians…The alliances between Jewish ladies and British lords are mostly of this type, the wife providing large sums…while the aristocrat has the title and ancient estate. The children are able to look back upon a varied bag of ancestors.”

Pine obviously does not approve of these parvenus: “There can be no question that the British Peerage is now very much diluted with Jewish blood and has many connections among its most ancient and august families with those who only a few generations ago were inhabitants of the Ghetto.”

But he opines that England’s enfeebled elite may need this protection from the “forces of recvolution”:

“The power of money is very great and as almost every liberal newspaper is under Jewish influence it follows that the forces of revolution when directed against the peers are likely to meet with as determined an opposition from the Jewish kinfolk of the aristocracy…”

L.G. Pine needn’t worry about the “forces of revolution” since they were created by Jewish finance to concentrate power and wealth in their own hands. This will find its apogee in the New World Order.

CONCLUSION

The “Jewish Conspiracy” may indeed be the British Empire, and the “Jews” may in fact be the Masonic British aristocracy who regard themselves as Jews, and often are. They consider themselves one of the lost tribes of Israel, the real “Chosen People.” The word “Brit” apparently derives from the Hebrew for “pact” or “covenant” ( i.e. the Jewish Covenant with God.) Members of the British royal family are circumcised by a Jewish mohel.

All I can say is, the Tribe is not whom I thought!

The CIA's Truth Problem

The CIA's Truth Problem

The United States has been trying to run a secret intelligence service in an open democracy for sixty years. It depends on trust between politicians and spies, two professions known to wrestle with truth. Trust has been broken time and again.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s recent charge that the CIA lied to her about the torture of suspected terrorists under President George W. Bush has started a whirlwind of spin. The big lie–President Bush said the United States didn’t torture, though we did–has been lost in the maelstrom. So has a harsh truth: yes, the CIA has stonewalled and deceived Congress in the past, but Congress is stone deaf and derelict in overseeing the CIA.

Pelosi’s old Congressional colleague Leon Panetta, who runs the CIA, wants to set things right. “There’s been a lot of poison in the well,” Panetta said on May 18, and “it hurts this country” when “Congress and the CIA don’t feel like they’re partners.” He said he would commune with his Congressional overseers, hash things out in private, talk with them “in a way in which we can be honest with one another.”

Good luck, Leon. Others have gone before you.

Like it or not, the United States needs trustworthy intelligence. But spying is a dirty and dangerous business. The CIA depends on officers who know how to lie, cheat and steal–”to use deception, to use manipulation, to use, frankly, dishonesty,” in the words of former CIA general counsel Jeffrey Smith. But when things go wrong overseas–as they often do–the CIA is called to account in Washington from time to time. That’s where things really go wrong.

The CIA is “an organization that thrives on deception,” says John Hamre, former deputy secretary of defense. “How do you manage an organization like that?” Congress hasn’t had the will or the wherewithal to do it....ever since the Siamese twins came to be one and the same.... CIA/MOSSAD.....and OSP/AMAN......

Congress created the CIA in 1947, and for a generation most of its members did as Senator John Stennis advised: “Make up your mind that you are going to have an intelligence agency and protect it as such, and shut your eyes some, and take what is coming.” Then a newly anointed president, Gerald Ford, let slip that the CIA had run lethal plots against foreign leaders, which would tarnish every president since Harry Truman....., CIA has an institutional joint venture with Syria's military intelligence goons for special operations and political assassinations through the infamous White House Murder INC, CIA used this Syrian conduit to bomb the PANAM 103 flight over Lockerbie and recently the string of assassinations in Lebanon and Syria, starting with the savage assassination of ex-minister Mr. Elie HOBEIKA and 3 of his companions on January 24th 2002......[ The threesome of assassins CIA/MOSSAD and Asef SHAWKAT...]

http://newhk.blogspot.com/2008/12/uniiic-ii-report-revisited.html

Ford looked back in some anguish on this; he had been a Congressman when called to serve on the Warren Commission, which looked into the assassination of President Kennedy. Late in life he reflected on the CIA’s keeping secrets from the commission–notably its plots against President Kennedy. It was “unconscionable” that the CIA was “not giving us the full story,” Ford said....

But when he was in the White House, Ford feared that the truth about the past would destroy the CIA and damage the United States. That same kind of fear is drowning out calls for a truth commission on the conduct of the “war on terror.”

“The question is how to plan to meet the investigation of the CIA,” Ford mused at a White House meeting in February 1975. His chief of staff, Donald Rumsfeld, called for “a damage-limiting operation” to save the secrets from spilling in Congress. The man Ford chose to run the CIA–George H.W. Bush–tried his best. But no one protected former CIA director Richard Helms. He drew a two-year suspended sentence in 1977 on a federal charge of deceiving Congress about his orders from President Nixon to overthrow the government of Chile.

Helms had an obligation to testify truthfully, but he thought he had a higher oath to keep secrets. America’s political history turned on which oath mattered more. For the past thirty years, Congress has fought for the right to oversee the CIA. It has failed to fulfill its responsibilities.

Before President Reagan took office, in 1981, Congress created intelligence oversight committees in the Senate and the House. Reagan’s CIA chief, William Casey, foiled them for six years. “Casey was guilty of contempt of Congress from the day he was sworn in,” said Robert Gates, Casey’s number-two man, now defense secretary. Casey obfuscated gleefully before the intelligence committees; his senior officers testified evasively. Among the consequences was the Iran/Contra affair, which blew up in late 1986. The spectacle of the United States caught shipping weapons to Iran, skimming the profits and slipping the money to anticommunists in Central America came close to wrecking Reagan’s presidency.

From 1986 to ‘94, the CIA sent ninety-five highly classified reports on Moscow’s military strength to the White House. Senior CIA officials knew some of the data were manipulated by Moscow and designed to deceive the United States. They decided it didn’t matter. The discovery of this deception in 1995 was “incredible” and “shocking,” said Fred Hitz, then the CIA’s inspector general. “What came out of this whole episode was a feeling that the agency couldn’t be trusted.” The CIA had broken “the sacred trust,” said Hitz, “and without that, no espionage agency can do its job.”

Starting in 1995, the CIA used the Peruvian air force to shoot down airplanes suspected of carrying cocaine. In April 2001, the operation attacked a plane carrying a family of Michigan missionaries over the Amazon. Veronica Bowers, 35, and her daughter, Charity, seven months old, were killed. CIA inspector general John Helgerson reported that CIA officers had violated presidential orders controlling the operation and hid their misdeeds from Congress, the Justice Department and the National Security Council.

Seven years after the shoot-down, Peter Hoekstra–the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, now running for governor of Michigan–published a few damning paragraphs from the report. He called it evidence that the CIA “operates outside the law and covers up what it does and lies to Congress.” That’s what Pelosi said about torture.

Now, on orders from President Obama to dismantle and defeat Al Qaeda, the CIA is killing suspected terrorists with remote-controlled missiles fired from drone aircraft above Pakistan and Afghanistan. The CIA decides if it has hit the right targets and whether civilian deaths are acceptable. Do we want to live in a world where the CIA’s clandestine service has the authority to decide who lives and who dies? The idea that the CIA may be killing civilians, sparking an ever wider war, is too hot for Congress to handle.

Oversight is a word with two meanings–to oversee and to oversleep. So is mislead. It means to lie, and it means a lack of leadership. Congress has a responsibility to oversee the CIA that remains largely unfulfilled. It has to ask the right questions, demand full answers and report the facts annually to the American people.

Will the CIA tell Congress the truth? Would Congress listen if it did? If trust remains broken, intelligence will fail again. And when intelligence fails, soldiers and civilians die.

Iran nuclear leaks 'linked to Israeli intelligence ruse....'

Iran nuclear leaks 'linked to Israeli intelligence ruse....'


WASHINGTON - A report on Iran's nuclear program issued by the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee last month generated news stories publicizing an incendiary charge that US intelligence is underestimating Iran's progress in designing a "nuclear warhead" before the halt in nuclear weapons-related research in 2003.



That false and misleading charge from an intelligence official of a foreign country, who was not identified but was clearly Israeli, reinforces two of Israel's key themes on Iran - that the 2007 US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran is wrong, and that Tehran is poised to build nuclear weapons as soon as possible.

But it also provides new evidence that Israeli intelligence was the source of the collection of intelligence documents which have been used to accuse Iran of hiding nuclear weapons research.

The committee report, dated May 4, cited unnamed "foreign analysts" as claiming intelligence that Iran ended its nuclear weapons-related work in 2003 because it had mastered the design and tested components of a nuclear weapon and thus didn't need to work on it further until it had produced enough sufficient material.

That conclusion, which implies that Iran has already decided to build nuclear weapons, contradicts both the 2007 NIE on Iran, and current intelligence analysis. The NIE concluded that Iran had ended nuclear weapons-related work in 2003 because of increased international scrutiny, and that it was "less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005".

The report included what appears to be a spectacular revelation from "a senior allied intelligence official" that a collection of intelligence documents supposedly obtained by US intelligence in 2004 from an Iranian laptop computer included "blueprints for a nuclear warhead".

It quotes the unnamed official as saying that the blueprints "precisely matched" similar blueprints the official's own agency "had obtained from other sources inside Iran".

No US or International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) official have ever claimed that the so-called laptop documents included designs for a "nuclear warhead". The detailed list in a May 26, 2008, IAEA report of the contents of what have been called the "alleged studies" - intelligence documents on alleged Iranian nuclear weapons work - made no mention of any such blueprints.

In using the phrase "blueprints for a nuclear warhead", the unnamed official was evidently seeking to conflate blueprints for the re-entry vehicle of the Iranian Shehab missile, which were among the alleged Iranian documents, with blueprints for nuclear weapons.

When New York Times reporters William J Broad and David E Sanger used the term "nuclear warhead" to refer to a re-entry vehicle in a November 13, 2005, story on the intelligence documents on the Iranian nuclear program, it brought sharp criticism from David Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and International Security.

"This distinction is not minor," Albright observed, "and Broad should understand the differences between the two objects, particularly when the information does not contain any words such as nuclear or nuclear warhead."

The Senate report does not identify the country for which the analyst in question works, and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff refused to respond to questions about the report from Inter Press Service (IPS), including the reason why the report concealed the identity of the country for which the unidentified "senior allied intelligence official" works.

Reached later in May, the author of the report, Douglas Frantz, said he was under strict instructions not to speak with the news media.

After a briefing on the report for selected news media immediately after its release, however, the Associated Press reported May 6 that interviews were conducted in Israel. Frantz was apparently forbidden by Israeli officials from revealing their national affiliation as a condition for the interviews.

Frantz, a former journalist for the Los Angeles Times, had extensive contacts with high-ranking Israeli military, intelligence and Foreign Ministry officials before joining the Senate Foreign Relations Committee staff. He and co-author Catherine Collins conducted interviews with those Israeli officials for The Nuclear Jihadist, published in 2007. The interviews were all conducted under rules prohibiting disclosure of their identities, according to the book.

The unnamed Israeli intelligence officer's statement that the "blueprints for a nuclear warhead" - meaning specifications for a missile re-entry vehicle - were identical to "designs his agency had obtained from other sources in Iran" suggests that the documents collection which the IAEA has called "alleged studies" actually originated in Israel.

A US-based nuclear weapons analyst who has followed the "alleged studies" intelligence documents closely says he understands that the documents obtained by US intelligence in 2004 were not originally stored on the laptop on which they were located when they were brought in by an unidentified Iranian source, as US officials have claimed to US journalists.

The analyst, who insists on not being identified, says the documents were collected by an intelligence network and then assembled on a single laptop.

The anonymous Israeli intelligence official's claim, cited in the committee report, that the "blueprints" in the "alleged studies" collection matched documents his agency had gotten from its own source seems to confirm the analyst's finding that Israeli intelligence assembled the documents.

German officials have said that the Mujahedin E Khalq (MEK), the Iranian resistance organization, brought the laptop documents collection to the attention of US intelligence, as reported by IPS in February 2008. Israeli ties with the political arm of the MEK, the National Committee of Resistance in Iran (NCRI), go back to the early 1990s and include assistance to the organization in broadcasting into Iran from Paris.

The NCRI publicly revealed the existence of the Natanz uranium-enrichment facility in August 2002. However, that and other intelligence apparently came from Israeli intelligence. The Israeli co-authors of The Nuclear Sphinx of Tehran, Yossi Melman and Meir Javeanfar, revealed that "Western" intelligence was "laundered" to hide its actual provenance by providing it to Iranian opposition groups, especially NCRI, in order to get it to the IAEA.

They cite US, British and Israeli officials as sources for the revelation.

New Yorker writer Connie Bruck wrote in a March 2006 article that an Israeli diplomat confirmed to her that Israel had found the MEK "useful" but declined to elaborate.

Israeli intelligence is also known to have been actively seeking to use alleged Iranian documents to prove that Iran had an active nuclear weapons program just at the time the intelligence documents which eventually surfaced in 2004 would have been put together.

The most revealing glimpse of Israeli use of such documents to influence international opinion on Iran's nuclear program comes from the book by Frantz and Collins. They report that Israel's international intelligence agency Mossad created a special unit in the summer of 2003 to carry out a campaign to provide secret briefings on the Iranian nuclear program, which sometimes included "documents from inside Iran and elsewhere".

The "alleged studies" collection of documents has never been verified as genuine by either the IAEA or by intelligence analysts. The Senate report said senior United Nations officials and foreign intelligence officials who had seen "many of the documents" in the collection of alleged Iranian military documents had told committee staff "it is impossible to rule out an elaborate intelligence ruse ......"

The New Republic’s website published a remarkable but thus far little-noticed article by Michael Makovsky and Ed Morse. Makovsky is an alumnus of Doug Feith’s Office of Special Plans and younger brother of former Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) director David Makovsky, while Morse is a former energy analyst for the now-defunct Lehman Brothers. More to the point, both were key players behind last year’s ultra-hawkish Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) report on Iran’s nuclear program, which Makovsky wrote with Michael Rubin and which was characterized here as a “roadmap to war”. Perhaps even more disconcerting than the report’s actual recommendations was the fact that one of the task force members was Dennis Ross, who is now the State Department’s special envoy in charge of Iran. The fact that Ross signed off on the report, which seemed to take for granted the necessity of military action against Iran, was yet another indication that he was a poor choice to facilitate the Obama administration’s diplomatic outreach to Tehran.

Makovsky and Morse’s new TNR article, however, is notable because it topples one of the pillars on which Iran hawks in the U.S. have based their arguments: the notion that targeted sanctions on the Iranian energy sector would cause serious damage to Iran’s economy and coerce Tehran into abandoning its nuclear program. Read the rest of this entry »

It is becoming ever clearer that Obama (with SecDef Gates as his main pillar of support) is the one person who can deflect (maybe) the push for war over the Iranian nuclear program. Such a course may eventually put the president in harm’s way politically, and perhaps even physically.

It is all but certain that Iran will not renounce its nuclear ambitions. Pakistan, with a 60-year history, has a nuclear arsenal; the Persians, with a 2,500-year old civilization, feel themselves more than entitled to join the nuclear club. Does this present a mortal danger to nuclear Israel? Not really. The mortal danger is that in 10 years there will be about 500 million Arabs living in the Middle East, including perhaps 80 or 100 million young men without jobs or prospects, and that one Arab nation or another will by then have a nuclear weapon or weapons in its possession. Additionally, by 2020 or 2030 Arabs will outnumber Jews in Israel itself. The Iranians are almost the last thing Israel should be worrying about.

I predict that before 2048 Israel, as a Jewish state, will have ceased to exist. And unless the Israelis develop better social skills really soon, they are going to pay a terrible price for their actions since the ‘67 war.

What really worries me is how much America will suffer from the Israeli albatross around its neck. If bad things happen to us — militarily, economically, and in terms of terrorism — because of our unqualified support for that country, we may very well see a violent reaction against Israel and, I fear, American Jews as well. We are heading toward a train wreck that could be very bloody indeed. I’m sorry for the doomsday vision, but I don’t think my concern is overstated.

As so often in history, the impending tragedy could be averted if only people thought a little harder, saw a little farther. But I don’t see reason prevailing on this one....

To say there is no evidence that Iran is after a nuclear weapon is incorrect. It is known that Iran obtained nuclear expertise from Pakistan in the past. Further, it can be inferred from what is known about the Iranian program that a bomb is at least one of its goals. The Iranians are not going to come out and say so, for obvious reasons. But an objective examination of the situation leaves no real doubt that their program has a military component.

Unlike some people, I do not find this particularly alarming. I am 100% in favor of doing everything possible to achieve a U.S.-Iran rapprochement. Friendship with Iran, rather than Israel, is the key to advancing U.S. interests in the Middle East generally (where it would serve as a counterweight to U.S. dependence/reliance on Saudi Arabia), and specifically in the Persian Gulf (through which something like 25% of world oil flows). U.S. policy goals in Afghanistan, the Caucasus, and Central Asia are probably achievable only with a friendly Iran.....

Aside from the necessity of diversifying its energy resources, and including nuclear energy in the mix (which I explained in an article in Harvard International Review, Winter 2005), Iran is after the Japan model, namely, having the complete domestic industry for producing low-enriched uranium for its nuclear reactors, but also putting it in a position that would enable it to break out on a short notice, if a national emergency arises.

Who can blame Iran? Regardless of how we view its regime, Iran is in one of the worst neighborhoods in the world, with an unstable, nuclear-armed Pakistan on the east (from which the Jundallah terrorists attack Iran), a constantly threatening nuclear-armed Israel on the West, and claims to its territorial integrity by the United Arab Emirate in the south which are supported by the U.S., not to mention a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan (and even in Pakistan).

At this point it seems fairly clear that Obama is clueless with respect to foreign policy. At best he is ambivalent. Given that his entire foreign policy team is right of center, it seems doubtful that we will avoid more war, Admiral Mullen not withstanding. AIPAC’s control of Congress remains as firm as ever, Obama fans the flames of war in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan. His lawyers continue to successfully invoke the government’s “right” to state secrets against hapless and unwitting prisoners of war (a.k.a. “terrorists”). Probably in the end, Obama will regret his decisions and/or lack of them with respect to foreign policy and his inability to stand up to Israel. But by then it will be too late....

First, I want to point out that we are awash in oil right now. This means that gasoline demand is down, reserves are at 98% of capacity, we have filled tankers sitting off-shore. We are in another oil bubble. The last time this drew to a contango mess was on the eve of the Israel/Lebanon war of ‘06. I believe we may have allowed Israel to go ahead with it’s attack after saber rattling failed to reach the needed $77/barrel. The war with Lebanese got the price to $75 which was less than what they wanted but forestalled a contango crisis.

(Contango is when the spot price is far below the futures price, this means the investor overbid the oil price and will have to sell for far less than he bought it for. Since so much of this is the low interest gov’t loans that bailed out these manipulators we’re paying for the gas manipulation 4-5 times over now. One more bubble pop and our enfeebled economy could collapse–at least the financiers.)

This next contango bubble could see the same convergence of foreign policy at the service of market manipulation. If this sounds a bit conspiratorial I’d direct you to Smedley Butler’s “War Is a Racket,” ask you to reflect on South America and the Middle East. I don’t see these as sole or even primary reasons for this action–hell, when is it a bad time to kill brown people? We have many Machiavellian if myopic reasons to proceed with the status quo, but this market imbalance must be kept in perspective.

While Iran has been under crippling sanctions for some time, the oil glut has no doubt hurt Iran. Sales at the well head are down, as are revenues. And, much of this bubble goes to the financiers not to the producers. After all, the producers are still having to subsidize the gas for domestic consumption.

I also want to point out that Saudi Arabia already likely has nukes though this is not widely discussed. It seems only sensible that Iran get them as well. I don’t know how much longer this country can continue to bully the world. Are we China’s unwitting terrier? How much can we do for Israel, how much more militarism can we afford?

This country can’t afford to run the deficits we’re running. We can’t fight China as they could dump our dollars and cripple us instantly. The Fed had to bail out the 10yr Treasury note when it found few buyers. What I am trying to discern is how much of a bang and puff of smoke will we leave as the American empire succumbs to entropy and Hoyle and finds it’s own reasonable limits.

This will seem very painful here. We will slowly slide a bit while the rest of the world gains and improves. This is a good thing. The best thing would be for us to hold only a Navy, patrol the seas for a tribute and develop our own manufacturing base. We’d benefit from fair trade and real competition. But, these would help us over the long term.

Over the short run our myopic ministers will support what’s most advantageous right now. Increasingly, the advantage is going to political supporters rather than the American people. We are being fleeced. I would like to see liberals engage libertarians and vice versa. They agree on retiring the American empire, sadly we’re represented by the lackeys of the War machine in both parties. The longer we allow this, the further we will descend. When the fight is over, it doesn’t really serve one well to continue the bellicose overtures. Our ugliness (and hypocrisy) is evident to all but ourselves.....

Dream Big! Become an agent of the Siamese twins CIA/MOSSAD, a Spy

Dream Big! Become an agent of the Siamese twins CIA/MOSSAD, a Spy!

A couple of days ago, during a pleasant lunch-hour chat, my good friend treated me to a charming story about his 8-year-old son. Essentially, the story involved my friend asking his son what he wanted to be when he grew up, and the son responded, with endearing, childlike innocence, that he wanted to grow up to be either a professional basketball player, a doctor, or a roofer, like his father. My friend was understandably proud of his son, who had demonstrated that he was capable of "dreaming big" yet obviously still revered his father.

As my friend was relating the story, it occurred to me that we have done a rather poor job in America of inspiring our children to dream about their future careers. If all we have managed to do is to inspire our children to dream of becoming professional athletes, doctors, or marine biologists, then we have been remiss in teaching them what it really means to "dream big." There are bigger and better things to do in the world today than treating diseases, playing sports, and studying humpback whales. At the top of the list is becoming a spy on American soil for the Israeli government.

Israeli spies in the United States, (unlike American doctors, athletes, and marine biologists), are privy to information about what the federal government of the United States is actually doing. American citizens, on whose purported behalf the federal government exists, are not granted access to a great deal of information labeled "classified" by their betters, but if one becomes an Israeli spy, then all that changes. Want to know whether the federal government is considering starting a new war with Iran? You are not allowed to know such things as a mere citizen of the United States, but if you simply join a nefarious Israeli spy ring you will be privy to everything! Want to find out the federal government’s most secretive data on building a nuclear weapon? Don’t waste your life filing Freedom of Information Act requests, just start spying for Israel!

Israeli spies are not merely restricted to reading classified information about our government, however. On the contrary, they are able to take an active part in the "governing" process that is denied to mere citizens of the United States. If you are an individual American citizen seeking to influence, say, the appointment of an important official in the current administration, your chances of doing so are infinitesimally slim. But if you join the Israeli spy network or its enabling front organization, the sky is the limit! Don’t like a certain appointee? Just voice your concerns (and smear the candidate as an "anti-Semite"), and your wish shall be the U.S. government’s command. No one will worry one iota about the fact that you have admitted to handing documents over to a foreign government, because you are an Israeli spy – not the bad kind, you see.

It might be thought that the perquisites of becoming an Israeli spy would be outweighed by the obvious dangers involved in espionage on behalf of a foreign government. The fact is, however, that becoming a spy for Israel in America is arguably less dangerous to one’s life and health than becoming a doctor or a professional athlete. Doctors can catch contagious diseases, and professional athletes can get killed or paralyzed. Israeli spies in America, on the other hand, don’t really have much to worry about – even if they get caught red-handed. Indeed, as long as they are somewhat modest in the amount of material they steal from America, it is very unlikely that that will even be punished if caught. The charges against them will miraculously go away, or they will be allowed to mysteriously and anonymously disappear before serving jail time. They might get deported to Israel, but that can hardly be deemed a harsh penalty for their perfidious actions. Some are even able to get American congressmen and other administration officials to act on their behalf when they get caught spying for Israel. Try doing that as an ordinary American doctor or professional athlete seeking clemency, and see how far it gets you!

In conclusion, what I am suggesting here is that American parents need to broaden their children’s horizons and encourage them to dream outside the American box when they consider their future careers. It is restrictive and provincial to think that your children are "dreaming big" when they aspire to become lowly doctors or humble professional athletes. These professions, after all, will always lack the special rights and immunities that are granted to agents of a foreign government. If you want your children to be truly respected (even feared) by their rulers and have some actual say in the governing process in America, tell them to start planning for a powerful and privileged career in treason to the US constitution...., an agent of the Siamese twins CIA/MOSSAD, a Spy!

Egypt/CIA roll up an Israeli plot directed against Obama?

Egypt/CIA roll up an Israeli plot directed against Obama?

Egyptian security forces detained a number of students at Cairo's Al-Azhar University on May 27 in raids of student residences in the Madinat-Nasr neighborhood prior to a speech President Barack Obama is to give in Cairo on June 4. The much-awaited speech by Obama to the Arab and Muslim world comes amid a deterioration in U.S. relations with Israel over the refusal of the Likud-led government of Binyamin Netanyahu to accede to U.S. demands to halt the expansion of Jewish settlements in the illegally-occupied West Bank.

Obama's speech at Cairo University, located in Giza south of the Egyptian capital, is co-hosted by Al-Azhar University. Obama also plans to visit a Cairo mosque on his June 4 visit, which does not include any overnight stays in Cairo. Obama is scheduled to arrive from Saudi Arabia, a last minute addition to the itinerary, visit Cairo on June 4, and fly off to Germany the same day.

The security sweeps by Egyptian security forces were directed against Russian students from Russia's restive Caucasus republics of Chechnya, Dagestan, Ingushetia, and North Ossetia. In addition, students from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Britain, France, and Denmark were also rounded up by Egyptian authorities. Several laptop computers and cash were also seized by the Egyptians. There are also some reports that some Americans studying at Al Azhar were taken into custody but were released the same day.

Egyptian authorities later released some of the Russian and Kazakh detainees.

The number of Russian students detained was said to be more than 35. At first, Egyptian authorities refused the Russian Consulate in Cairo access to the detainees. A report from the Russian republic of Ingushetia stated the number of Russian detainees was 198, much higher than other press reports. Russian government sources put the total number of foreigners detained by Egypt at 150.

The Egyptians reportedly asked some of the detained students whether they planned to carry out "another Hussein Square." On February 22 of this year, a bomb thrown into the crowded Hussein Square tourist mecca in central Cairo killed a woman from France and injured 20 other people, including a French boy who was critically injured. No claim of responsibility for the attack was ever made but it came after tensions in the region were heightened over Israel's attack on and continuing siege of the Gaza Strip.

The students rounded up in Egypt were asked about the sources of their money. It appears that the Russian students apprehended were not part of an official Russian and Egypt student program. The Council of Muftis of Russia stated that none of the Russian students taken into custody by the Egyptians were at Al-Azhar as part of any officially-sanctioned program of the council. Many of the students detained were at the university in violation of the visa regime in place and were not registered with Russian Muslim authorities.

There are reports that Obama will visit the Al-Azhar University mosque in Cairo. The president will be protected by an American security force of 3,000 personnel, as well as 30,000 Egyptian security officers. Some parts of the presidential itinerary and route in Cairo remain classified.

The Egyptian authorities' questioning of the source of funding for the Russians and other Al-Azhar students is noteworthy. WMR has previously reported on the many links between the Russian-Israeli mafia and Muslim terrorist groups, including Chechen guerrillas.

On January 11, 2009, we reported on the supply of weapons to Hamas from Russian-Israeli mafia circles in Israel. WMR also reported on the strong links between Russian-Israeli mob tycoon Boris Berezovsky and the late Russian intelligence officer Alexander Litvinenko, who died in London from polonium-210 poisoning, and Chechen guerrillas who were responsible for a number of terrorist attacks aimed at destabilizing the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

According to Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov, Berezovsky, in a major false flag operation, funded Chechen guerrillas by having Chechen warlords Shamil Basayev, Movladi Udugov, and Salman Raduyev kidnap people so that Berezovsky could finance them through the payment of ransoms totaling into the millions of dollars. Western intelligence linked "Al Qaeda" units to the Chechens funded by Berezovsky, providing yet another link between the Russian-Israel Mafia and "Al Qaeda." Berezovsky was also accused by Chechen leaders of financing extreme Wahhabi Kavkaz-TV television broadcasts designed to stir up anti-Russian passions among Chechen's Muslims. The Russian-Israeli fugitive billionaire, who enjoys asylum in Britain, was also linked to various Chechen terrorist attacks in Moscow. Berezovsky also supported Islamist radicals in the neighboring Russian Republic of Ingushetia, where some of the Chechen guerrillas found refuge.

The involvement of Russian Muslims in the Egyptian investigation of a potential threat against Obama, at the same time of souring relations between the Obama administration and Israel's government, which includes the extreme right-wing Moldovan-Israeli mob boss Avigdor Lieberman as Foreign Minister, is a strong indication that whatever the Egyptians uncovered about a threat against the President may have had "false flag" fingerprints all over it.

Using Russian and central Asian Muslims in Cairo in a false flag operation diected against Obama would have generated a backlash against Muslims and Arabs, something that Obama is trying to reverse by his speech and very presence in Cairo, and engendered both sympathy for Israel's Likud government and hostility towards Muslims from Egypt and Palestine to central Asia.

It is also likely that the Egyptian security services were tipped off by their American counterparts before the raid on Al-Azhar students. The question posed by the Egyptians to the Russians and other central Asians whether they planned a repeat of the Hussein Square bombing in February was likely prompted by either signals intelligence (SIGINT) intercepts by the National Security Agency (NSA), human intelligence evidence, or a combination of the two. A bombing anywhere in Cairo during Obama's visit would create a media frenzy that would place Egypt and Obama's wider Muslim and Arab audience in a bad light.

Any incident during Obama's trip to Egypt would undoubtedly result in the following from Israeli propagandist, CNN's Wolf Blitzer: "And now for Israel's reaction to this latest example of terrorism in the Middle East, we go to Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev in Jerusalem. Mark, what does Israel think about this latest incident in Cairo?" "Thank you, Wolf, Israel deplores this latest action and believes . . . blah, blah, blah, blah."

American Values....

American Values....

Two Sides of the Same Coin: Heads-Heads....

http://www.justacitizen.com/OpEd/Two%20Sides%20of%20The%20SameCoin-May22-09.htm

Our forefathers fought a revolution against Britain based on the soaring rhetoric of the Declaration of Independence “all men are created equal.” However as soon as the fighting was over, the “Founding Fathers” wrote the Constitution and excluded slaves, Native Americans and the vast majority of whites who were not wealthy landowners from either voting or holding office.

While over the years the voting franchise has become more inclusive, elite control of our county is complete, facilitated by corporate media and two political parties beholden to our moneyed interests and historic American values.

For more than two centuries we enslaved Africans. Even with the heroic efforts of the Abolition Movement, it still took a Civil War to end this injustice.

When the white man first arrived at the shores of the New World, he was by and large received with hospitality. We repaid it with genocide against the First Americans, as our forefathers broke every treaty ever signed to steal their land for our new ‘democracy.’

Not content to wreak havoc upon Native Americans and the Africans brought to our shores, our forefathers engaged in wars of aggression against Spain, Mexico and the Philippines to implement our ‘manifest destiny’ of an empire from sea to shining sea and then some. More recently we have fought wars of aggression in Vietnam, Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan. We have seen our CIA orchestrate and support military coups across the globe in Nicaragua, Chile, Greece, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Philippines, Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela, etc. We have seen a slew of CIA/MOSSAD political assassinations in Lebanon, starting with the assassination of Mr. Elie HOBEIKA, January 24th 2002.... http://newhk.blogspot.com/2008/12/uniiic-ii-report-revisited.html

Since the mid 1970s, we have seen an alphabet soup of U.S. agencies (AID, NED, CFD, CIPE, IFES, ODI, etc) ‘promote democracy’ abroad. Turning the English language on its head, they have done this by stifling and thwarting popular movements representing the people and supporting local elite rule that does the bidding of transnational capital at the expense of their people.

While the U.S. record on torture is pretty good when engaged with white European nations, the same cannot be said when engaged with the rest of humanity.

Economically, unregulated capitalism has performed its natural function to create progressive inequality. Coupled with the globalization creed of the neoliberals, our own unregulated capitalism has ruined almost every economy across the globe. The fledgling American middle class that sprang up after WWII as the result of a few minor adjustments to capitalism, is well on its way to extinction as both political parties dance to Capital’s tune and the people are unrepresented.

Corporate control of the media has left Americans uninformed and as a whole unequipped to rebel against elite corporate rule. Senator Richard Durbin recently made this candid statement about the Wall Street banks’ relationship to Congress, “They frankly own the place.” He could have also included the so-called ‘defense’ industry, health insurers and pharmaceutical companies.

Elite rule, corporate controlled media, slavery, genocide, torture, wars of aggression and progressive inequality this is our history and these are our American values. When our current president refers to American values with his own soaring rhetoric, he ignores the reality of U.S. Empire. Real change of these American values will leave both our country and world a better place.

CIA Tactics and methods

National Endowment for Democracy sponsored, financed and organized opposition movements designed to overthrow governments are currently happening in

• Russia
• 
  
• Lebanon
  

• Myanmar

• Venezuela

• Zambia

• Belarus

• Bolivia

• Iran

• Chechnya

• North Korea

• East Turkestan - Uyghur

...Osama Bin Laden: Dead Or Alive?

During the cold war this was a CIA operation but beginning in the Reagan administration it was outsourced to the NED

The principal tactic is

to provoke a confrontation. The goal of these protests is to provoke a heavy-handed reaction from the government, in order to create wider sympathy for the protesters, and to awaken discontent for the regime.

This is a common strategy in such movements, they're doing what it takes to awaken people's political consciousness. But to omit this fact from media accounts is incredibly misleading. You get the sense that they were denied the right to voice their opinion, and once they did, they were surprised by a vicious OMON attack which no one could have foreseen.

What horseshit. One Western journalist I know told me that he regretted not including his interview with one protest leader, who openly admitted that it was the opposition's strategy to provoke the authorities, into his article.

Russian human rights activists
Moscow Helsinki Group and the
Russian-Chechen Friendship Society
People In Need Foundation
Free NK Radio. The founder ...Kim Seung Min

NED in Canada

The networks of "democratic" interference
.
.

Judeo Fascism week.....

On November 4, 1995, after a demonstration held in support of the Oslo Accords, held in Tel Aviv's "Kings of Israel Square" (Kikar Malkhey Yisrael כיכר מלכי ישראל, now "Rabin Square" - Kikar Rabin כיכר רבין), Amir awaited Rabin in the parking lot adjacent the square, close to Rabin's official limousine, where he shot Rabin twice with a Beretta 84F semi-automatic pistol in .380 ACP caliber (serial number D98231Y). During the act, Amir also injured Yoram Rubin, a security guard, with another shot.

the circumcision of Yigal Amir's (the assassin of Yitzak Rabin) newborn son is to fall precisely on the 12th anniversary of the November 4 assassination of Yitzhak Rabin.

There is Larissa Trimbobler, who plays the beloved if dubious Sarah to Yigal Amir's Shabtai Zvi. Trimbobler's stated intention to someday tell her son, not that his lifer father Yigal was a murderer, but that he "sacrificed himself for his people."

The hilltop hotheads, the gunslinger grunge and grange society of the wild West Bank, the Kahane worshipers, the Muslim-baiters dance and rejoice.....

...... Your country is ruled by madmen and they`re doing their best to destroy any possibility of peace in the Middle East for at least 100 years. But average Israeli citizens voted them to power so they are as guilty as the politicians.

The Zionist extremists in Israel are hellbent on creating a purely Jewish state. Genocide mean nothing to nutcases who think that some god gave them title to the land. The fact of the matter is that the ancestors of the Ashkenazim came from southern Russia and don`t have one drop of Israelite blood in their entire bodies. Therefore you have no rightful claim to the land of Palestine. The land truly belongs to the Semitic people (Arabic and Sephardic Jew) who lived on the land before the European Ashkenazi colonizers invaded.....

......

Israeli/Jewish obfuscations continue for centuries....

Israeli leaders cannot deal with the Palestinian problem. Both one state and two state solution are difficult solutions. Israeli leaders talk about Iran to divert the people’s attention.

For a psychological exploration of the Amalek complex, see Myron B. Gubitz, “Amalek: The Eternal Adversary,” Psychological Perspectives 8 (1977): 34-58. — See also Avner Falk’s description how medieval Jews “continued to live in the past more than in the present, in fantasy more than in reality. Their fantastic biblical Hebrew names for various countries persisted and multiplied. France was called Zarephath (1 Kings 17:9, Obad. 1:20), the Mediterranean countries were known as Kittim (Gen. 10:4). Lotharingia was called Lothair. The enemies of the Jews, whoever they were, continued to be called Amalek, Edom, or Ishmael. Another Jewish response to catastrophe was to fall back upon the myth of election, proving by all manner of philosophical and theological reasoning that the Jews were God’s Chosen People and a Light unto the Nations” (A Psychoanalytic History of the Jews [Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1996], pp. 466-67). — Falk considers this pattern of evading reality to be a “strategy of psychological survival.” — In fact, the patterns of thought on both sides of the Arab-Israeli conflict are remarkably similar, even co-dependent; see Emmanuel Sivan, “The Mythologies of Religious Radicalism: Judaism and Islam,” Terrorism and Political Violence 3 (1991): 71-81....

Zionist leaders always use the “Amalek” analogy upon anyone who opposes them and thereby justify their cruelty and war crimes as a commandment from GOD to ethnically cleanse or exterminate “the enemy”. The Amalek analogy is a call to DESTROY and is 100 times worse than any twisted use of the slogans of a Crusade or Jihad....

“Just like those Jews who profess their devotion to the two-state solution and to ending the occupation, but in practice spend most of their time attacking anyone who makes a serious effort to further these goals…” Exactly. Just like Abe Foxman assures us that not all criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic — but just try to find an example.

The World Trade Center Towers and 9/11

....http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2296490368603788739

If the laws of physics were in place on 9/11, the towers were demolished with incendiaries (thermate has been proven to be used by Prof. Steven Jones). A total collapse AT FREE FALL SPEED is a physical impossibility without the structure being progressively demolished ahead of the collapse front. FACT. FACT. Even if the towers DID begin to collapse from impact and fire (they didn’t), then the top of the building COULD NOT HAVE FALLEN THROUGH THE STRONGEST STRUCTURE (the rest of the building) EVER BUILT AT FREE FALL SPEED!

Tell us how 3 steel concrete buildings just disappeared in a flash with only supposedly 2 planes involved..... ...Vans With Explosives Confirmed At The World Trade Center on September 11th.

I SAID SUPPOSEDLY! And while your at it–explain to us how an aluminum plane can smash into such a strongly built building and the plane’s nose cone come out the other end ? Smart folks know that the video of the plane was also a scam-came out–24 hrs after the hit.....

If one jet plane could bring a tall steel framed highrise so perfectly straight down like it's claimed happened that day, how come demolition experts don’t use the comparatively cheap method of igniting multi-gallons of jet fuel (kerosene) instead of the millions spent on intricately rigged controlled demolition which it obviously was.....?
.....Open Letter to Rachel Maddow on Obama, Brzezinski and 9/11 Conspiracy....